| Literature DB >> 33014378 |
Anna Brandtner1, Piotr Tymoszuk2, Manfred Nairz2, Georg F Lehner1, Gernot Fritsche2, Anja Vales3, Andreas Falkner3, Harald Schennach3, Igor Theurl2, Michael Joannidis1, Günter Weiss2,4, Christa Pfeifhofer-Obermair2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sepsis, a dysregulated host response following infection, is associated with massive immune activation and high mortality rates. There is still a need to define further risk factors and laboratory parameters predicting the clinical course. Iron metabolism is regulated by both, the body's iron status and the immune response. Iron itself is required for erythropoiesis but also for many cellular and metabolic functions. Moreover, iron availability is a critical determinant in infections because it is an essential nutrient for most microbes but also impacts on immune function and intravascular oxidative stress. Herein, we used a prospective study design to investigate the putative impact of serum iron parameters on the outcome of sepsis.Entities:
Keywords: Ferritin; Infection; SOFA score; Transferrin; Transferrin saturation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33014378 PMCID: PMC7528491 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-020-00495-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intensive Care ISSN: 2052-0492
Fig. 2Iron parameters correlate with SOFA and vital status of sepsis patients.
Iron parameters and hematological markers: serum iron, ferritin, hematocrit, serum transferrin, and TF-Sat and SOFA score were routinely determined at patient’s admission at ICU.
a Correlation of iron parameters with SOFA. SOFA score value was modeled as a function of the parameters with mixed-effect linear model (fixed effect: the investigated parameter, random effects: gender and age). For strongly non-normally distributed ferritin and iron concentrations log10 values were used for modeling. Each point represents a single observation, and blue solid lines depict the fitted regression lines. Regression slope β estimates with 95% CI, p value for slope significance (two-tailed t test, β ≠ 0) and n numbers of observations are presented in the plots.
b Differential regulation of iron parameters in survivors and ICU deceased sepsis patients. Each point represents a single observation, bars and whiskers depict mean with SEM. Statistical significance was determined with mixed-effect linear model (fixed effect: vital status, random effects: gender and age). For strongly non-normally distributed ferritin and iron concentrations log10 values were used for modeling. In the plots, n numbers of survivors and deceased participants and p values (two-tailed t test, β ≠ 0) are presented
Fig. 3Transferrin saturation is a SOFA-independent survival predictor. a Predictive power of age- and sex-corrected serum iron concentration, ferritin, transferrin (TF), TF saturation (TF-Sat), hematocrit (HT), and SOFA. Correlation with ICU mortality for each of the investigated parameters was analyzed with a separate logistic regression model with inclusion of age and sex as confounders. Significance for regression β estimates was determined with Wald Z test. Results are presented as a forest plot. Points represent exponentiated β estimates, and whiskers represent 95% CI. Points are labeled with exponentiated estimate, CI, and p values. Survivors: n = 41, deceased: n = 20.
b Comparison of predictive power for SOFA and compound SOFA-iron parameter models. A family of logistic regression models correlating SOFA, 0–3 combinations of the iron/hematological parameters linked in a to survival as well as of age and sex as confounders with ICU mortality was generated. For each model, estimate p-values (determined with Wald Z test), Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and concordance index (C-index) was calculated. Best performing models, i.e., those with significant non-confounder estimates and better AIC and C-index than the SOFA-alone model, are labeled with non-confounder variable names. Survivors: n = 41, deceased: n = 20.
c Estimates for non-confounder parameters of the best-performing SOFA-compound model identified in (B, SOFA + TF-Sat) presented as a forest plot. Significance for regression β estimates was determined with Wald Z test. Points represent exponentiated β estimates, whiskers represent 95% CI. Points are labeled with exponentiated estimate, CI, and p values. Significance of the inclusion of the TF-Sat term was assessed with likelihood ratio test (pLRT, compound model vs SOFA-alone model). Survivors: n = 41, deceased: n = 20
Fig. 4Predictive power of transferrin saturation in receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis. Theoretical survival probabilities for study participants were calculated using the age- and sex-adjusted SOFA, age- and sex-adjusted TF-Sat and the age- and sex-adjusted SOFA-compound model identified in Fig. 3b (SOFA + TF-Sat). The plot displays ROC for the models with optimal cutoffs labeled. The table presents calculated optimal cutoffs, positive and negative predictive values at the optimal cutoff (PPV and NPV), numbers of false-positive and false-negative cases at the optimal cutoff (FP and FN), and area under the curve (AUC) for ROCs with 95% CI
Fig. 1Flow chart of screening and inclusion of patients admitted to the ICU
Characteristic of patients
| All patients ( | Survivor ( | Non-survivor ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male, | 37 (60.7%) | 22 (53.7%) | 15 (75%) | 0.163 |
| Female, | 24 (39.3%) | 19 (46.3%) | 5 (25%) | 0.163 |
| Age, years | 63 (21–88) | 63 (21–88) | 67 (53-85) | 0.293 |
| SOFA | 11 (± 4) | 10 (± 3.8) | 14 (± 3.2) | 0.0002 |
| SAPS II | 54 (± 19) | 47 (± 16.6) | 68 (± 16.9) | 0.002 |
| ICU-mortality, | 19 (31.2%) | |||
| Hospital mortality, | 15 (23.4%) | |||
| Pneumonia, | 23 (37.7%) | 15 (36.6%) | 8 (40%) | 0.990 |
| Urinary tract infection, | 6 (12.8%) | 5 (12.2%) | 1 (5%) | 0.654 |
| Acute abdominal infection, | 6 (9.8%) | 3 (7.3%) | 3 (15%) | 0.384 |
| Skin or soft tissue infection, | 6 (9.8%) | 4 (9.8%) | 2 (10%) | 0.990 |
| Blood catheter infection, | 2 (4.3%) | 2 (4.8%) | 0 | 0.990 |
| Implant infection, | 1 (2.1%) | 1 (2.4%) | 0 | 0.990 |
| Others, | 6 (9.8%) | 3 (7.3%) | 3 (15%) | 0.384 |
| Multiple foci, | 11 (18.0%) | 6 (14.6%) | 5 (25%) | 0.479 |
| patients with malignant diseases, | 11 (18.0%) | 6 (14.6%) | 5 (25%) | 0.479 |
| Septic shock, | 47 (77.1%) | 28 (68.3%) | 19 (95%) | 0.024 |
| Immunosuppresive co-medication, | 26 (41.0%) | 15 (36.6%) | 11 (55%) | 0.270 |
| Red blood cell transfusion (within 3 months before admission, | 18 (29.5%) | 7 (17.0%) | 11 (55%) | 0.006 |
Indicated are numbers of patients and in brackets the respective percentage to the cohort (all patients, survivor, non-survivor)
Age is reported as median and range, SOFA and SAPS II scores are reported as mean ± SD
p values were determined by Fisher’s exact test, t test, Mann-Whitney test
Laboratory parameters at admission
| All patients ( | Survivor ( | Non-survivor ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (G/l) | 13.6 (6.5–20.8) | 14.6 (7.4–21) | 12.4 (2.2–19.4) | 0.6558 |
| C-reactive protein (mg/dl) | 25.0 (± 12) | 24.3 (± 11.2) | 26.3 (± 13.2) | 0.550 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 2.1 (1.3–3.2) | 1.8 (1.3–2.9) | 2.2 (0.9–2.7) | 0.930 |
| Iron (μmol/l) | 3.9 (2.3–7.4) | 3.3 (2.2–6.2) | 6.1 (2.9–12.5) | 0.041 |
| Ferritin (μg/l) | 567.5 (254.5–1381) | 395 (203.5–834.5) | 1558 (322–3967) | 0.008 |
| Transferrin (mg/dl) | 127.9 (± 54.2) | 138.4 (± 51.3) | 106.3 (± 52.2) | 0.034 |
| TF-Sat (%) | 11 (7–33.5) | 9 (6–19) | 25 (8–59.5) | 0.021 |
Parameters with normal distribution are presented as mean ± SD, measurements with significant deviation from a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk p < 0.05) are presented as median and interquartile range. WBC white blood cell count, TF-Sat transferrin saturation
Characteristics of SOFA and SOFA-extended logistic regression models presented in Fig. 3b
| Model ID | Parameters | P LRT | AIC | C-index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOFA_1 | log10 ferritin, SOFA, sex, age | 0,043 | 60 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_2 | log10 iron, SOFA, sex, age | 0,21 | 63 | 0.85 |
| SOFA_3 | Transferrin, SOFA, sex, age | 0,13 | 62 | 0.87 |
| SOFA_4 | TransfSat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,034 | 60 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_5 | log10 ferritin, log10 iron, SOFA, sex, age | 0,13 | 62 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_6 | log10 ferritin, transferrin, SOFA, sex, age | 0,093 | 62 | 0.87 |
| SOFA_7 | log10 ferritin, TF-Sat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,059 | 61 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_8 | log10 iron, transferrin, SOFA, sex, age | 0,16 | 63 | 0.87 |
| SOFA_9 | log10 iron, TF-Sat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,1 | 62 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_10 | Transferrin, TF-Sat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,097 | 62 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_11 | log10 ferritin, log10 iron, transferrin, SOFA, sex, age | 0,18 | 64 | 0.86 |
| SOFA_12 | log10 ferritin, log10 iron, TF-Sat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,11 | 63 | 0.87 |
| SOFA_13 | log10 ferritin, transferrin, TF-Sat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,12 | 63 | 0.87 |
| SOFA_14 | log10 iron, transferrin, TF-Sat, SOFA, sex, age | 0,2 | 64 | 0.86 |
| SOFA | SOFA, sex, age | NA | 62 | 0.84 |
| SAPSII_1 | log10 ferritin, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,041 | 61 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_2 | log10 iron, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,28 | 64 | 0.86 |
| SAPSII_3 | Transferrin, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,091 | 62 | 0.87 |
| SAPSII_4 | TransfSat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,049 | 61 | 0.87 |
| SAPSII_5 | log10 ferritin, log10 iron, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,12 | 63 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_6 | log10 ferritin, transferrin, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,071 | 62 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_7 | log10 ferritin, TF-Sat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,068 | 62 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_8 | log10 iron, transferrin, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,16 | 63 | 0.87 |
| SAPSII_9 | log10 iron, TF-Sat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,13 | 63 | 0.87 |
| SAPSII_10 | Transferrin, TF-Sat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,11 | 63 | 0.87 |
| SAPSII_11 | log10 ferritin, log10 iron, transferrin, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,15 | 64 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_12 | log10 ferritin, log10 iron, TF-Sat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,11 | 63 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_13 | log10 ferritin, transferrin, TF-Sat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,13 | 63 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII_14 | log10 iron, transferrin, TF-Sat, SAPSII, sex, age | 0,22 | 65 | 0.88 |
| SAPSII | SAPSII, sex, age | NA | 63 | 0.85 |
FT ferritin, TF transferrin, TF-Sat transferrin saturation, Iron serum iron