Javier Puente1, Urbano Anido2, Miguel Ángel Climent3, Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia4, Nuria Lainez5, Julio Lambea6, José Pablo Maroto7, Maria Jose Mendez-Vidal8, Álvaro Montesa9, Angel Rodriguez10, Curro Zambrana11, Aránzazu González-Del-Alba12. 1. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain. 2. Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 3. Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain. 4. Hematology & Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain; Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia-UCAM, Murcia, Spain. 5. Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. 6. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain. 7. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. 8. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain. 9. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Regional de Málaga, Málaga, Spain. 10. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de León, León, Spain. 11. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián De Los Reyes, Spain. 12. Medical Ongology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Calle Joaquin Rodrigo 2, Majadahonda, Madrid 28222, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to provide practical recommendations on the management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed after docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or abiraterone plus ADT. METHODS: Systematic literature review (SLR), nominal group meeting, and Delphi process. A panel of 12 experts was established who defined the scope, users, and sections of the document. We performed an SLR in order to assess the efficacy and safety of available drugs in patients with mCRPC. Abstracts from the American Society of Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meetings were also examined. The results were discussed during an expert meeting in which 14 recommendations were generated. The level of agreement with the recommendations was also tested by 13 additional experts following the Delphi process. Recommendations were voted by means of scores ranging from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). We defined agreement when at least 70% of the experts voted ⩾7. Next, we assigned a level of evidence and grade to the recommendation using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence, following which the final document was drafted. RESULTS: The literature search did not find any articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Finally, 13 out of 14 recommendations were accepted after two Delphi rounds (two were modified after the first round). They pertain to general and individual case-based treatment recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In mCRPC patients who have progressed after docetaxel or abiraterone plus ADT in the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer setting, these recommendations may support treatment decision-making, due to the lack of evidence or other globally accepted sequencing algorithms.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to provide practical recommendations on the management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed after docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or abiraterone plus ADT. METHODS: Systematic literature review (SLR), nominal group meeting, and Delphi process. A panel of 12 experts was established who defined the scope, users, and sections of the document. We performed an SLR in order to assess the efficacy and safety of available drugs in patients with mCRPC. Abstracts from the American Society of Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meetings were also examined. The results were discussed during an expert meeting in which 14 recommendations were generated. The level of agreement with the recommendations was also tested by 13 additional experts following the Delphi process. Recommendations were voted by means of scores ranging from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). We defined agreement when at least 70% of the experts voted ⩾7. Next, we assigned a level of evidence and grade to the recommendation using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence, following which the final document was drafted. RESULTS: The literature search did not find any articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Finally, 13 out of 14 recommendations were accepted after two Delphi rounds (two were modified after the first round). They pertain to general and individual case-based treatment recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In mCRPC patients who have progressed after docetaxel or abiraterone plus ADT in the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer setting, these recommendations may support treatment decision-making, due to the lack of evidence or other globally accepted sequencing algorithms.
Authors: Kim N Chi; Neeraj Agarwal; Anders Bjartell; Byung Ha Chung; Andrea J Pereira de Santana Gomes; Robert Given; Álvaro Juárez Soto; Axel S Merseburger; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Hirotsugu Uemura; Dingwei Ye; Kris Deprince; Vahid Naini; Jinhui Li; Shinta Cheng; Margaret K Yu; Ke Zhang; Julie S Larsen; Sharon McCarthy; Simon Chowdhury Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Parker; S Nilsson; D Heinrich; S I Helle; J M O'Sullivan; S D Fosså; A Chodacki; P Wiechno; J Logue; M Seke; A Widmark; D C Johannessen; P Hoskin; D Bottomley; N D James; A Solberg; I Syndikus; J Kliment; S Wedel; S Boehmer; M Dall'Oglio; L Franzén; R Coleman; N J Vogelzang; C G O'Bryan-Tear; K Staudacher; J Garcia-Vargas; M Shan; Ø S Bruland; O Sartor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael T Schweizer; Xian C Zhou; Hao Wang; Sunakshi Bassi; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Edoardo Francini; Steven Yip; Shubidito Ahmed; Haocheng Li; Luke Ardolino; Carolyn P Evan; Marina Kaymakcalan; Grace K Shaw; Philip W Kantoff; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Nimira S Alimohamed; Anthony M Joshua; Daniel Y C Heng; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Ana M Aparicio; Andrea L Harzstark; Paul G Corn; Sijin Wen; John C Araujo; Shi-Ming Tu; Lance C Pagliaro; Jeri Kim; Randall E Millikan; Charles Ryan; Nizar M Tannir; Amado J Zurita; Paul Mathew; Wadih Arap; Patricia Troncoso; Peter F Thall; Christopher J Logothetis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Theodoros Karantanos; Christopher P Evans; Bertrand Tombal; Timothy C Thompson; Rodolfo Montironi; William B Isaacs Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Mari Nakabayashi; Oliver Sartor; Susanna Jacobus; Meredith M Regan; David McKearn; Robert W Ross; Philip W Kantoff; Mary-Ellen Taplin; William K Oh Journal: BJU Int Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Robert W Ross; Tomasz M Beer; Susanna Jacobus; Glenn J Bubley; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Christopher W Ryan; Jiaoti Huang; William K Oh Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kefeng Liu; Yanfang Ma; Yongjie Yang; Jingli Lu; Jie Zhao; Shuzhang Du; Xuepei Zhang; Chunlei Liu; Francesco Del Giudice; Masaki Shiota; Shingo Hatakeyama; Xiaojian Zhang; Jian Kang Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-07