| Literature DB >> 33013899 |
Xi Zeng1,2, Joseph Chi-Ching Tsui3, Mai Shi2, Jie Peng4, Cyanne Ye Cao2, Lea Ling-Yu Kan2, Carol Po-Ying Lau2, Yonghao Liang2, Lingyi Wang2, Li Liu4, Zhiwei Chen4, Stephen Kwok-Wing Tsui2,5,6.
Abstract
Background and methods: Host genomic alterations are closely related to dysfunction of CD4+ T lymphocytes in the HIV-host interplay. However, the roles of aberrant DNA methylation and gene expression in the response to HIV infection are not fully understood. We investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation and transcriptomic profiles in two HIV-infected T lymphocyte cell lines using high-throughput sequencing.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; HIV infection; apoptosis; gene expression; genome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33013899 PMCID: PMC7511662 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Distribution of the DMRs. (A) Heatmap displaying the methylation levels of DMRs in control and HIV+ T cells. (A) An unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (Euclidean distance, complete linkage method) identified two main clusters: control (Jurkat_control and HIV_control) and HIV+ (Jurkat_HIV and MT-2_HIV). Log-transformed methylation levels were displayed as a range from low (blue) to high (red). (B) Comparison of the observed and expected distribution of DMRs in the MT-2 cell line. (C) Comparison of the observed and expected distribution of DMRs in the Jurkat cell line. “obs_ratio_HIV,” observed ratio of DMRs in HIV-infected samples; “obs_ratio_control,” observed ratio of DMRs in the control sample; “exp_ratio,” expected ratio in the genomic background. The asterisk indicates significant differences with P < 0.01 between the two bars connected by line segments. (D) Change of methylation in enhancers after HIV infection of the MT-2 cell line. Ratio of the overlap of enhancers with DMRs in the MT-2 cell line. The expected ratio was calculated based on a random distribution.
DMRs selected for bisulfite sequencing.
| chr13 | 28493501 | 28493900 | Hyper | promoter | |
| chr10 | 8101301 | 8101600 | Hypo | promoter | |
| chr4 | 109087301 | 109087400 | Hypo | promoter | |
| chr12 | 115121601 | 115121700 | Hyper | promoter | |
| chr11 | 68607601 | 68607800 | Hypo | promoter | |
| chr9 | 87284101 | 87284300 | Hyper | promoter |
Figure 2Enrichment analysis of disease and biological functions among the DEGs using IPA. (A) DEGs upregulated in HIV+ samples from the MT-2 cell line; (B) DEGs downregulated in HIV+ samples from the MT-2 cell line; (C) DEGs upregulated in HIV+ samples from the Jurkat cell line; (D) DEGs downregulated in HIV+ samples from the Jurkat cell line. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Levels of the Smad3 and GATA3 proteins in Jurkat cells infected by HIV and in the mock control. (A) Western blot analysis of Smad3 and GATA3 on human Jurkat T cells infected by HIV and in the mock-infection control. The results of all three replicates are shown. GAPDH was used as the normalization control. (B) Relative expression levels of the Smad3 (ab28379) and GATA3 (ab199428) proteins against that of GAPDH, as determined by immunoblotting. Compared with the control sample, the HIV sample exhibited a significantly lower expression of Smad3 (P < 0.001) and GATA3 (P < 0.01) (data were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05).
Figure 4Correlation between changes in gene expression and DNA methylation in promoters and gene bodies. (A) The ratio of the number of upregulated genes divided by the number of downregulated genes in terms of the different annotation categories of DMRs. The chi-squared test was used in this analysis. The data obtained from the MT-2 and Jurkat cell lines were combined. (B) Gene-body DNA methylation was positively correlated with gene expression levels. Scatter plot showing the fold change in the methylation level of gene bodies against the fold change of gene expression levels for all DEGs between HIV+ and control T cells. Gene-body regions were defined as the genomic region starting from the transcription start site to the last base of the gene. Gene expression was correlated positively with gene-body methylation in the (a) MT-2 cell line (Spearman's rank correlation r = 0.30, P < 2.2e−16) and (b) Jurkat cell line (Spearman's rank correlation r = 0.28, P < 2.2e−16). Genes exhibiting increased gene expression and gene-body methylation are located in the upper-right quadrant, whereas other genes that became transcriptionally silenced by reduced methylation in HIV+ samples are located in the lower-left quadrant.
Figure 5Disease and biological function enrichment for overlap of DEG and DMG. (A) Disease and biological function enrichment for overlap of DEG and DMG in the MT-2 cell line. (B) Disease and biological function enrichment for overlap of DEG and DMG in the Jurkat cell line.
Candidate genes related to apoptosis for future research.
| Up | Up | hyper-DMR in genebody | hypo-DMR in promoter | lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 | |
| Down | Down | hypo-DMR in genebody | cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A | ||
| Down | Down | hypo-DMR in genebody | hypo-DMR in genebody | homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 | |
| Up | Up | hypo-DMRin promoter | hypo-DMR in promoter | GATA binding protein 3 | |
| Down | Down | hypo-DMR in genebody | hypo-DMR in genebody; hyper-DMR in promoter | SMAD family member 3 | |
| Down | Down | hypo-DMR in genebody | hypo-DMR in genebody | amyloid beta precursor protein | |
| Down | Down | hyper-DMR in promoter | galectin 3 | ||
| Up | Up | hyper-DMR in genebody | hyper-DMR in genebody | O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase | |
| Down | Down | hypo-DMR in genebody | hypo-DMR in genebody | ryanodine receptor 2 | |
| Down | Down | hypo-DMR in genebody | hypo-DMR in genebody | NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 | |
| Down | Down | hyper-DMR in promoter | TNF receptor associated factor 1 | ||
| Down | Down | hyper-DMR in promoter | Tumor necrosis factor | ||
| Down | Down | hyper-DMR in promoter | hyper-DMR in promoter | T-Box Transcription Factor | |
| Up | Up | hypo-DMR in promoter | Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase 1A | ||
| Down | Down | hyper-DMR in promoter | hyper-DMR in promoter | Insulin Promoter Factor 1 | |
| Down | Down | hyper-DMR in promoter | Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 |
“Up” means upregulated; “Down” means downregulated.
Figure 6Analysis of the effect of Tat and Rev on PDX1 and SMAD3 promoter activity. Results of the promoter gene reporter assay. The luciferase activity was calculated based on the Fluc:Rluc ratio. The promoter vector (PDX1 or SMAD3) was transfected into HEK293T cells, together with the empty pCDNA3.1+ vector, a Tat-expressing vector (Tat), and a Rev-expressing vector (Rev). The experiments were repeated six times. Holm–Sidak's multiple comparisons test. ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. N.s., non-significant.