| Literature DB >> 33013830 |
Iddo Vardi1,2,3,4, Irit Chermesh5, Lael Werner1,2, Ortal Barel2,3,4, Tal Freund2,6, Collin McCourt7, Yael Fisher8, Marina Pinsker1,9, Elisheva Javasky2,3,4, Batia Weiss1,2, Gideon Rechavi2,3,4, David Hagin2,6, Scott B Snapper10,11, Raz Somech2,12,13,14, Liza Konnikova7,15,16, Dror S Shouval1,2.
Abstract
Background: More than 50 different monogenic disorders have been identified as directly causing inflammatory bowel diseases, typically manifesting in the first years of life. We present the clinical course and immunological work-up of an adult patient who presented in adolescent years with an atypical gastrointestinal phenotype and was diagnosed more than two decades later with a monogenic disorder with important therapeutic implications.Entities:
Keywords: CTLA4; LRBA; common variable immunodeficiency; enteropathy; inflammatory bowel disease; monogenic; whole exome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33013830 PMCID: PMC7509434 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Inflammatory cell infiltration of the small and large intestine in the patient with LRBA deficiency. Figure displays hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain at (A) ×100 and (B) ×400 of duodenal biopsies. The mucosa shows flattened villi and hyperplastic crypts, with an increase in plasma cells in the lamina propria. Crypt epithelium shows increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (arrows). Next, an H&E stain of the transverse colon is presented at (C) ×100 and (D) ×400. The structure of the colonic mucosa is preserved. The stroma is infiltrated by mononuclear inflammatory cells and the crypt epithelium shows increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (arrows), similar to the duodenal biopsy. The lamina propria shows increase in plasma cells.
Figure 2Sanger sequencing confirming stop-gain mutation in LRBA. Figure depicts chromatogram of LRBA Sanger gene sequencing. Arrow indicates the position of the mutation (c.1455 C>A) resulting in a stop codon indicated by a box.
Figure 3The LRBA-deficient patient exhibits significantly altered immune landscape. (A) Main immune subtypes as a proportion of total leukocytes in control and patient samples. (B) tSNE map generated after Phenograph clustering of all samples combined. Top row: cluster map. Bottom row: density plots. (C) Ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T cells and (D) ratio of naïve:memory T cells in control and patient samples. (E) Tregs as percent of total leukocytes. (F) Mean metal intensity (MMI) of FOXP3, CD25, and IL-10 in patient and control Tregs. ***P < 0.001. CM, central memory; DC, dendritic cells; DNT, double negative T cells; EM, effector memory; ILC, innate lymphoid cells; MDCS, myeloid derived suppressor cells; Mono, monocytes; n, naïve; NKT, natural killer T cells; Tregs, regulatory T cells.
Percent of various leukocyte populations and accompanying normal values.
| Tregs | 1.6 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 3 (1–6) | CD4 | |
| CD4 naïve | 18.9 | 44.7 | 1.6 | 7.6 | 43 (18–66) | CD4 | |
| CD4 CM | 17.8 | 40.6 | 17.0 | 33 (19–52) | CD4 | ||
| CD4 EM | 5.5 | 12.6 | 2.2 | 10.4 | 17 (7–30) | CD4 | |
| Total CD4 | 43.9 | 21.0 | 25–60 | ||||
| CD8 naïve | 8.6 | 31.1 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 36 (8–67) | CD8 | |
| CD8 CM | 1.0 | 3.5 | 19.1 | 10 (3–22) | CD8 | ||
| CD8 EM | 8.5 | 30.5 | 8.2 | 14.7 | 19 (6–39) | CD8 | |
| CD8 TEMRA | 0.3 | 0.0 | 9 (2–21) | CD8 | |||
| Total CD8 | 18.4 | 28.3 | 5–30 | ||||
| Total T cells | 62.2 | 49.4 | 55–84 | ||||
| Tγδ | 0.6 | 0.3 | |||||
| NKT | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.42 | 6 (1–15) | CD3 | |
| DNT | 4.1 | 5.7 | 17.3 | 7 (2–21) | |||
| NK | 9.4 | 3.6 | 10–30 | CD3 | |||
| ILC1 | 0.5 | 2.0 | |||||
| Mono | 9.0 | 2.7 | |||||
| MDSC | 0.4 | 20.9 | |||||
| Total Mono | 9.5 | 5–10 | |||||
| DCs | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1–2 | ||||
| B cells | 9.6 | 0.6 | 5–10 | ||||
Since there are no CyTOF “normal” values, we show reference values obtained from
www.miltenyibiotec.com and Bisset et al. (25) and from
Apoil et al. (.
Figure 4Aberrant Treg phenotype in the LRBA-deficient patient. Figure depicts (A) decreased percentages of CD25highFOXP3+ Tregs, (B) decreased levels of helios+ inducible Tregs, and (C) low levels of CTLA4 in Tregs in the LRBA-deficient patient, compared with control. Cells gated on CD4+ T cells.
Figure 5Decreased cytokine production by the LRBA-deficient patient. (A) Ratio of memory T cells producing TNF-α to those not producing any TNF-α, without stimulation. (B) Heatmap of cytokine expression under baseline conditions and with PMA/I stimulation in clusters associated with Figure 3B. PMA/I, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin.
Figure 6Oligoclonal expansion of T- and B-cell clones in the LRBA-deficient patient. Figure displays (A,D) representative Treemap images, (B,E) cumulative percentages of the top 100 clones, and (C,F) Shannon's H analysis of TCRB and IgH, respectively, assessed by NGS of peripheral blood.
Comparison of the clinical phenotype of the index patients to other LRBA-deficient patients.
| Autoimmunity | + | 82 |
| Enteropathy | + | 63 |
| Splenomegaly | Mild (13.6 cm on ultrasonography) | 57 |
| Recurrent pneumonias | – | 49 |
| Chronic diarrhea | + | 48 |
| Lymphadenopathy | – | 43 |
| Hepatomegaly | + (17 cm on ultrasonography) | 40 |
| Failure to thrive | – | 37 |
| Interstitial lung disease | – | 28 |
| Sinusitis | + | 24 |
| Bronchiectasis | – | 23 |
| Otitis media | – | 21 |
| Clubbing | + | 19 |
| Arthritis | + | 18 |
| Granulomatous lesions | – | 14 |
| Allergy and asthma | – | 14 |
| Candidiasis | – | 10 |
| Septicemia | + (following perforated appendicitis) | 9 |
| Abscess | – | 6 |
| Malignancy | – | 6 |
| Meningitis | – | 5 |
| Osteomyelitis | – | 1 |
The clinical manifestations of the reported patient were compared to 103 patients with LRBA deficiency reported elsewhere (.