Literature DB >> 33013177

Evaluation of NASA's high-resolution global composition simulations: Understanding a pollution event in the Chesapeake Bay during the summer 2017 OWLETS campaign.

Natasha Dacic1,2, John T Sullivan1, K Emma Knowland3,4, Glenn M Wolfe1,5, Luke D Oman1, Timothy A Berkof6, Guillaume P Gronoff2,6.   

Abstract

Recirculation of pollutants due to a bay breeze effect is a key meteorological mechanism impacting air quality near urban coastal areas, but regional and global chemical transport models have historically struggled to capture this phenomenon. We present a case study of a high ozone (O3) episode observed over the Chesapeake Bay during the NASA Ozone Water-Land Environmental Transition Study (OWLETS) in summer 2017. OWLETS included a complementary suite of ground-based and airborne observations, with which we characterize the meteorological and chemical context of this event and develop a framework to evaluate model performance. Two publicly-available NASA global high-resolution coupled chemistry-meteorology models (CCMMs) are investigated: GEOS-CF and MERRA2-GMI. The GEOS-CF R2 value for comparisons between the NASA Sherpa C-23 aircraft measurements to the GEOS-CF resulted in good agreement (R2: 0.67) on July 19th and fair agreement (R2: 0.55) for July 20th. Compared to surface observations, we find the GEOS-CF product with a 25 x 25 km2 grid box, at an hourly (R2: 0.62 to 0.87) and 15-minute (R2: 0.64 to 0.87) interval for six regional sites outperforms the hourly nominally 50 x 50 km2 gridded MERRA2-GMI (R2: 0.53 to 0.76) for four of the six sites, suggesting it is better capable of simulating complex chemical and meteorological features associated with ozone transport within the Chesapeake Bay airshed. When the GEOS-CF product was compared to the TOLNet LiDAR observations at both NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) and the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel (CBBT), the median differences at LaRC were -6 to 8% and at CBBT were ± 7% between 400 to 2000 m ASL. This indicates that, for this case study, the GEOS-CF is able to simulate surface level ozone diurnal cycles and vertical ozone profiles at small scales between the surface level and 2000 m ASL. Evaluating global chemical model simulations at sub-regional scales will help air quality scientists understand the complex processes occurring at small spatial and temporal scales within complex surface terrain changes, simulating nighttime chemistry and deposition, and the potential to use global chemical transport simulations in support of regional and sub-regional field campaigns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chesapeake Bay; GEOS-CF; Ozone; Ozone LIDAR; global model; model evaluation

Year:  2019        PMID: 33013177      PMCID: PMC7526533          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  9 in total

1.  Langley mobile ozone lidar: ozone and aerosol atmospheric profiling for air quality research.

Authors:  Russell De Young; William Carrion; Rene Ganoe; Denis Pliutau; Guillaume Gronoff; Timothy Berkoff; Shi Kuang
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  The MERRA-2 Aerosol Reanalysis, 1980 - onward, Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation.

Authors:  C A Randles; A M Da Silva; V Buchard; P R Colarco; A Darmenov; R Govindaraju; A Smirnov; B Holben; R Ferrare; J Hair; Y Shinozuka; C J Flynn
Journal:  J Clim       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.148

3.  The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2).

Authors:  Ronald Gelaro; Will McCarty; Max J Suárez; Ricardo Todling; Andrea Molod; Lawrence Takacs; Cynthia Randles; Anton Darmenov; Michael G Bosilovich; Rolf Reichle; Krzysztof Wargan; Lawrence Coy; Richard Cullather; Clara Draper; Santha Akella; Virginie Buchard; Austin Conaty; Arlindo da Silva; Wei Gu; Gi-Kong Kim; Randal Koster; Robert Lucchesi; Dagmar Merkova; Jon Eric Nielsen; Gary Partyka; Steven Pawson; William Putman; Michele Rienecker; Siegfried D Schubert; Meta Sienkiewicz; Bin Zhao
Journal:  J Clim       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.148

4.  Estimating surface NO2 and SO2 mixing ratios from fast-response total column observations and potential application to geostationary missions.

Authors:  T Knepp; M Pippin; J Crawford; G Chen; J Szykman; R Long; L Cowen; A Cede; N Abuhassan; J Herman; R Delgado; J Compton; T Berkoff; J Fishman; D Martins; R Stauffer; A M Thompson; A Weinheimer; D Knapp; D Montzka; D Lenschow; D Neil
Journal:  J Atmos Chem       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.158

5.  Observations and impacts of transported Canadian wildfire smoke on ozone and aerosol air quality in the Maryland region on June 9-12, 2015.

Authors:  Joel Dreessen; John Sullivan; Ruben Delgado
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States?

Authors:  Katherine R Travis; Daniel J Jacob; Jenny A Fisher; Patrick S Kim; Eloise A Marais; Lei Zhu; Karen Yu; Christopher C Miller; Robert M Yantosca; Melissa P Sulprizio; Anne M Thompson; Paul O Wennberg; John D Crounse; Jason M St Clair; Ronald C Cohen; Joshua L Laughner; Jack E Dibb; Samuel R Hall; Kirk Ullmann; Glenn M Wolfe; Illana B Pollack; Jeff Peischl; Jonathan A Neuman; Xianliang Zhou
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.133

7.  Bay breeze influence on surface ozone at Edgewood, MD during July 2011.

Authors:  Ryan M Stauffer; Anne M Thompson; Douglas K Martins; Richard D Clark; Daniel L Goldberg; Christopher P Loughner; Ruben Delgado; Russell R Dickerson; Jeffrey W Stehr; Maria A Tzortziou
Journal:  J Atmos Chem       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.158

8.  Ozone profiles in the Baltimore-Washington region (2006-2011): satellite comparisons and DISCOVER-AQ observations.

Authors:  Anne M Thompson; Ryan M Stauffer; Sonya K Miller; Douglas K Martins; Everette Joseph; Andrew J Weinheimer; Glenn S Diskin
Journal:  J Atmos Chem       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.158

9.  Chemical Mechanisms and Their Applications in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Earth System Model.

Authors:  J Eric Nielsen; Steven Pawson; Andrea Molod; Benjamin Auer; Arlindo M da Silva; Anne R Douglass; Bryan Duncan; Qing Liang; Michael Manyin; Luke D Oman; William Putman; Susan E Strahan; Krzysztof Wargan
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 6.660

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition.

Authors:  K E Knowland; C A Keller; P A Wales; K Wargan; L Coy; M S Johnson; J Liu; R A Lucchesi; S D Eastham; E Fleming; Q Liang; T Leblanc; N J Livesey; K A Walker; L E Ott; S Pawson
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 8.469

2.  Description of the NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS-CF v1.0.

Authors:  Christoph A Keller; K Emma Knowland; Bryan N Duncan; Junhua Liu; Daniel C Anderson; Sampa Das; Robert A Lucchesi; Elizabeth W Lundgren; Julie M Nicely; Eric Nielsen; Lesley E Ott; Emily Saunders; Sarah A Strode; Pamela A Wales; Daniel J Jacob; Steven Pawson
Journal:  J Adv Model Earth Syst       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 6.660

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.