Matthew Quaife1,2, Kevin van Zandvoort3, Amy Gimma3, Kashvi Shah4, Nicky McCreesh3, Kiesha Prem3, Edwine Barasa5,6, Daniel Mwanga7, Beth Kangwana7, Jessie Pinchoff8, W John Edmunds3, Christopher I Jarvis3, Karen Austrian7. 1. Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. matthew.quaife@lshtm.ac.uk. 2. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. matthew.quaife@lshtm.ac.uk. 3. Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Health Economics Research Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. 6. Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 7. Population Council, Nairobi, Kenya. 8. Population Council, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many low- and middle-income countries have implemented control measures against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it is not clear to what extent these measures explain the low numbers of recorded COVID-19 cases and deaths in Africa. One of the main aims of control measures is to reduce respiratory pathogen transmission through direct contact with others. In this study, we collect contact data from residents of informal settlements around Nairobi, Kenya, to assess if control measures have changed contact patterns, and estimate the impact of changes on the basic reproduction number (R0). METHODS: We conducted a social contact survey with 213 residents of five informal settlements around Nairobi in early May 2020, 4 weeks after the Kenyan government introduced enhanced physical distancing measures and a curfew between 7 pm and 5 am. Respondents were asked to report all direct physical and non-physical contacts made the previous day, alongside a questionnaire asking about the social and economic impact of COVID-19 and control measures. We examined contact patterns by demographic factors, including socioeconomic status. We described the impact of COVID-19 and control measures on income and food security. We compared contact patterns during control measures to patterns from non-pandemic periods to estimate the change in R0. RESULTS: We estimate that control measures reduced physical contacts by 62% and non-physical contacts by either 63% or 67%, depending on the pre-COVID-19 comparison matrix used. Masks were worn by at least one person in 92% of contacts. Respondents in the poorest socioeconomic quintile reported 1.5 times more contacts than those in the richest. Eighty-six percent of respondents reported a total or partial loss of income due to COVID-19, and 74% reported eating less or skipping meals due to having too little money for food. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 control measures have had a large impact on direct contacts and therefore transmission, but have also caused considerable economic and food insecurity. Reductions in R0 are consistent with the comparatively low epidemic growth in Kenya and other sub-Saharan African countries that implemented similar, early control measures. However, negative and inequitable impacts on economic and food security may mean control measures are not sustainable in the longer term.
BACKGROUND: Many low- and middle-income countries have implemented control measures against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it is not clear to what extent these measures explain the low numbers of recorded COVID-19 cases and deaths in Africa. One of the main aims of control measures is to reduce respiratory pathogen transmission through direct contact with others. In this study, we collect contact data from residents of informal settlements around Nairobi, Kenya, to assess if control measures have changed contact patterns, and estimate the impact of changes on the basic reproduction number (R0). METHODS: We conducted a social contact survey with 213 residents of five informal settlements around Nairobi in early May 2020, 4 weeks after the Kenyan government introduced enhanced physical distancing measures and a curfew between 7 pm and 5 am. Respondents were asked to report all direct physical and non-physical contacts made the previous day, alongside a questionnaire asking about the social and economic impact of COVID-19 and control measures. We examined contact patterns by demographic factors, including socioeconomic status. We described the impact of COVID-19 and control measures on income and food security. We compared contact patterns during control measures to patterns from non-pandemic periods to estimate the change in R0. RESULTS: We estimate that control measures reduced physical contacts by 62% and non-physical contacts by either 63% or 67%, depending on the pre-COVID-19 comparison matrix used. Masks were worn by at least one person in 92% of contacts. Respondents in the poorest socioeconomic quintile reported 1.5 times more contacts than those in the richest. Eighty-six percent of respondents reported a total or partial loss of income due to COVID-19, and 74% reported eating less or skipping meals due to having too little money for food. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 control measures have had a large impact on direct contacts and therefore transmission, but have also caused considerable economic and food insecurity. Reductions in R0 are consistent with the comparatively low epidemic growth in Kenya and other sub-Saharan African countries that implemented similar, early control measures. However, negative and inequitable impacts on economic and food security may mean control measures are not sustainable in the longer term.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Physical distancing; SARS-CoV-2; Social contacts
Authors: Simon P Johnstone-Robertson; Daniella Mark; Carl Morrow; Keren Middelkoop; Melika Chiswell; Lisa D H Aquino; Linda-Gail Bekker; Robin Wood Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Marius Gilbert; Giulia Pullano; Francesco Pinotti; Eugenio Valdano; Chiara Poletto; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Eric D'Ortenzio; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Serge Paul Eholie; Mathias Altmann; Bernardo Gutierrez; Moritz U G Kraemer; Vittoria Colizza Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher I Jarvis; Kevin Van Zandvoort; Amy Gimma; Kiesha Prem; Petra Klepac; G James Rubin; W John Edmunds Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: S Flasche; Imo Adetifa; C N Mburu; J Ojal; R Chebet; D Akech; B Karia; J Tuju; A Sigilai; K Abbas; M Jit; S Funk; G Smits; P G M van Gageldonk; F R M van der Klis; C Tabu; D J Nokes; Jag Scott Journal: BMC Med Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Guy Harling; Francesc Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Joseph Tlouyamma; Tinofa Mutevedzi; Chodziwadziwa Whiteson Kabudula; Ruth Mahlako; Urisha Singh; Daniel Ohene-Kwofie; Rose Buckland; Pedzisai Ndagurwa; Dickman Gareta; Resign Gunda; Thobeka Mngomezulu; Siyabonga Nxumalo; Emily B Wong; Kathleen Kahn; Mark J Siedner; Eric Maimela; Stephen Tollman; Mark Collinson; Kobus Herbst Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2021-05-13
Authors: Theo Prudencio Juhani Capeding; Rosalind Eggo; Maryam Huda; Mark Jit; Don Mudzengi; Nichola R Naylor; Simon Procter; Matthew Quaife; Lela Serebryakova; Sergio Torres-Rueda; Veronica Vargas; Sedona Sweeney; Anna Vassall Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-05
Authors: Lucia Cilloni; Han Fu; Juan F Vesga; David Dowdy; Carel Pretorius; Sevim Ahmedov; Sreenivas A Nair; Andrei Mosneaga; Enos Masini; Suvanand Sahu; Nimalan Arinaminpathy Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-10-24
Authors: Robin N Thompson; T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Valerie Isham; Daniel Arribas-Bel; Ben Ashby; Tom Britton; Peter Challenor; Lauren H K Chappell; Hannah Clapham; Nik J Cunniffe; A Philip Dawid; Christl A Donnelly; Rosalind M Eggo; Sebastian Funk; Nigel Gilbert; Paul Glendinning; Julia R Gog; William S Hart; Hans Heesterbeek; Thomas House; Matt Keeling; István Z Kiss; Mirjam E Kretzschmar; Alun L Lloyd; Emma S McBryde; James M McCaw; Trevelyan J McKinley; Joel C Miller; Martina Morris; Philip D O'Neill; Kris V Parag; Carl A B Pearson; Lorenzo Pellis; Juliet R C Pulliam; Joshua V Ross; Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba; Bernard W Silverman; Claudio J Struchiner; Michael J Tildesley; Pieter Trapman; Cerian R Webb; Denis Mollison; Olivier Restif Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Matthew Shupler; Mark O'Keefe; Elisa Puzzolo; Emily Nix; Rachel Anderson de Cuevas; James Mwitari; Arthur Gohole; Edna Sang; Iva Čukić; Diana Menya; Daniel Pope Journal: Appl Energy Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 9.746