Robert S Du Puy1, Rosalinde K E Poortvliet1, Simon P Mooijaart2, Wendy P J den Elzen3, Carol Jagger4, Simon H S Pearce5,6, Yasumichi Arai7, Nobuyoshi Hirose7, Ruth Teh8, Oliver Menzies8, Anna Rolleston8, Ngaire Kerse8, Jacobijn Gussekloo1,2. 1. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 5. Institute of Translational and Clinical Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 6. Endocrine Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom. 7. Center for Supercentenarian Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 8. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
Background: Subclinical and overt thyroid dysfunction is easily detectable, often modifiable, and, in younger age groups, has been associated with clinically relevant outcomes. Robust associations in very old persons, however, are currently lacking. This study aimed to investigate the associations between (sub-)clinical thyroid dysfunction and disability in daily living, cognitive function, depressive symptoms, physical function, and mortality in people aged 80 years and older. Methods: Four prospective cohorts participating in the Towards Understanding Longitudinal International older People Studies (TULIPS) consortium were included. We performed a two-step individual participant data meta-analysis on source data from community-dwelling participants aged 80 years and older from the Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and Japan. Outcome measures included disability in daily living (disability in activities of daily living [ADL] questionnaires), cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS]), physical function (grip strength) at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up, and all-cause five-year mortality. Results: Of the total 2116 participants at baseline (mean age 87 years, range 80-109 years), 105 participants (5.0%) were overtly hypothyroid, 136 (6.4%) subclinically hypothyroid, 1811 (85.6%) euthyroid, 60 (2.8%) subclinically hyperthyroid, and 4 (0.2%) overtly hyperthyroid. Participants with thyroid dysfunction at baseline had nonsignificantly different ADL scores compared with euthyroid participants at baseline and had similar MMSE scores, GDS scores, and grip strength. There was no difference in the change of any of these functional measures in participants with thyroid dysfunction during five years of follow-up. Compared with the euthyroid participants, no 5-year survival differences were identified in participants with overt hypothyroidism (hazard ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI 0.6-1.6]), subclinical hypothyroidism (HR 0.9 [CI 0.7-1.2]), subclinical hyperthyroidism (HR 1.1 [CI 0.8-1.7]), and overt hyperthyroidism (HR 1.5 [CI 0.4-5.9]). Results did not differ after excluding participants using thyroid-influencing medication. Conclusions: In community-dwelling people aged 80 years and older, (sub-)clinical thyroid dysfunction was not associated with functional outcomes or mortality and may therefore be of limited clinical significance.
Background: Subclinical and overt thyroid dysfunction is easily detectable, often modifiable, and, in younger age groups, has been associated with clinically relevant outcomes. Robust associations in very old persons, however, are currently lacking. This study aimed to investigate the associations between (sub-)clinical thyroid dysfunction and disability in daily living, cognitive function, depressive symptoms, physical function, and mortality in people aged 80 years and older. Methods: Four prospective cohorts participating in the Towards Understanding Longitudinal International older People Studies (TULIPS) consortium were included. We performed a two-step individual participant data meta-analysis on source data from community-dwelling participants aged 80 years and older from the Netherlands, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and Japan. Outcome measures included disability in daily living (disability in activities of daily living [ADL] questionnaires), cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale [GDS]), physical function (grip strength) at baseline and after 5 years of follow-up, and all-cause five-year mortality. Results: Of the total 2116 participants at baseline (mean age 87 years, range 80-109 years), 105 participants (5.0%) were overtly hypothyroid, 136 (6.4%) subclinically hypothyroid, 1811 (85.6%) euthyroid, 60 (2.8%) subclinically hyperthyroid, and 4 (0.2%) overtly hyperthyroid. Participants with thyroid dysfunction at baseline had nonsignificantly different ADL scores compared with euthyroid participants at baseline and had similar MMSE scores, GDS scores, and grip strength. There was no difference in the change of any of these functional measures in participants with thyroid dysfunction during five years of follow-up. Compared with the euthyroid participants, no 5-year survival differences were identified in participants with overt hypothyroidism (hazard ratio [HR] 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI 0.6-1.6]), subclinical hypothyroidism (HR 0.9 [CI 0.7-1.2]), subclinical hyperthyroidism (HR 1.1 [CI 0.8-1.7]), and overt hyperthyroidism (HR 1.5 [CI 0.4-5.9]). Results did not differ after excluding participants using thyroid-influencing medication. Conclusions: In community-dwelling people aged 80 years and older, (sub-)clinical thyroid dysfunction was not associated with functional outcomes or mortality and may therefore be of limited clinical significance.
Authors: Brenda S Bauer; Amaya Azcoaga-Lorenzo; Utkarsh Agrawal; Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe; Colin McCowan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: G Corona; L Croce; C Sparano; L Petrone; A Sforza; M Maggi; L Chiovato; M Rotondi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 4.256