Literature DB >> 33011763

Antimicrobial stewardship challenges and innovative initiatives in the acute hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ellen Martin1, Marie Philbin1, Gerry Hughes2,3, Colm Bergin2,3, Alida Fe Talento4,5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33011763      PMCID: PMC7665520          DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, As highlighted by Rawson et al., the consequences of the global pandemic due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for antimicrobial (AM) consumption, AM resistance (AMR) rates and healthcare-associated infections are as yet unknown. Since the diagnosis of the first case of COVID-19 on 29 February 2020 in Ireland, AM stewardship (AMS) teams across the acute hospital sector have adapted to changing work patterns and workloads. The Irish Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (AMRIC) team co-published guidance documents on the antiviral treatment of COVID-19 based on rapid evidence reviews as well as AMS strategies during the pandemic to assist clinicians nationally., We invited healthcare professionals involved in AMS programmes in the acute hospital setting to participate in an electronic survey hosted on SurveyMonkey® and open for participation from 20 to 25 May 2020. The survey investigated the challenges, if any, the COVID-19 pandemic posed to the effective delivery of AMS with a view to informing interventions to optimize delivery of AMS in the COVID-19 era. Data were collated and analysed on Microsoft Excel® 2019 and SPSS version 26 and are available in detail in Appendices S1 to S7 (available as Supplementary data at JAC Online). There were 98 respondents from 45 public and private hospitals in Ireland (45/67, 67%), of which 45% (43/95) were AMS and infectious diseases pharmacists, 26% (25/95) were clinical microbiologists and 11% (10/95) were infectious diseases physicians. Seventy-six percent (65/86) reported that COVID-19 had impacted on the effective implementation of AMS programmes locally with a statistically significant decrease in the median score for the effectiveness of AMS programmes from 7 pre-COVID-19 to 5 during COVID-19 (z = 6.584, P < 0.001). The greatest decline in effectiveness was seen in tertiary and general hospitals, most likely due to increased burden of COVID-19 cases in these healthcare facilities. Table 1 summarizes the unexpected AMS-related occurrences as a result of the pandemic as well as the interventions introduced to circumvent these challenges. The main themes identified related to AM use, MDR organism (MDRO) surveillance, diagnostics, use of experimental agents, medication supply and communication. AMS interventions specific to their COVID-19 patient cohort that were introduced and proved particularly effective during the acute phase of the pandemic included regular treatment guideline review and updates, introduction of biomarkers such as procalcitonin, review of indication of AMs and use of electronic resources. The majority found the national guidance documents, which were updated regularly, extremely useful.
Table 1.

Main themes identified in free-text reporting of unexpected AMS-related occurrences and AMS interventions introduced as a result of COVID-19

Challenges – unexpected AMS-related occurrences as a result of COVID-19Illustrative free-text responsesAMS interventions
AM use

Reduced adherence to AM prescribing policy

Increased use of restricted AMs

Increased use of broad-spectrum agents

Increased use of multiple agents

Increased prescription duration

Increased use of once-daily AMs, e.g. ceftriaxone (one respondent reported increased C. difficile as a result)

Difficulty de-escalating AM regimens

‘Duplication of antimicrobials, use of restricted antimicrobials, prolonged course of antimicrobials'

‘Less adherence to guidelines, more empiric, broad spectrum prescribing of antibiotics in COVID-19 positive patients’

‘Widespread prescription of antimicrobials without a clear indication for same due to concern for super-imposed bacterial infections in COVID-19 pneumonia; slow to stop/review [antibiotic] choice despite lack of evidence of bacterial infections; slow to revert to standard guidelines when patient is COVID −ve’

‘…there has been an increase in once daily antimicrobials for COVID-19 positive patients to treat secondary bacterial infection (ceftriaxone and levofloxacin). In patients in whom were initially managed on the COVID-19 pathway who subsequently tested negative with another alternative diagnosis we initially found it difficult to get these patients onto the appropriate antimicrobials for new diagnosis (e.g. co-amoxiclav for [community acquired] pneumonia, co-amoxiclav for urinary tract infection etc)…’

Introduction of specific AM guidelines for COVID-19 patients.

Use of preauthorization or restricted prescribing for experimental agents.

Extended use of once-daily dosing regimens.

Frequent review of antiviral and AM therapy in COVID-19 pathway.

Follow-up AMS review of patients with ‘SARS-CoV-2 not detected’.

Promotion of HSE guidance on specific antivirals and audit of use to assess prescribing patterns.

Promotion of iv-oral switch to reduce contact time.

Introduction of database for experimental agents and antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients.

MDRO surveillance

Decreased screening for MDRO

Increased C. difficile cases

MDRO outbreaks

‘(1) Increase in C. difficile cases, likely related to ceftriaxone administration.

(2) Increase in MDRO i.e. ESBL, VRE & MRSA. Likely more relates to hand hygiene & PPE rather than AMS.

(3) Reduced screening for MDRO due to use of laboratory diagnostics & staff for COVID-19 PCR, reduced nurses performing swabs, prioritisation of tasks in favour of COVID-19.’

Work in conjunction with the IPC teams and the microbiology laboratory.

Continuous education on hand hygiene and other IPC interventions.

Diagnostics
Difficulty in diagnosis of coinfections, which led to increased AM prescriptions.‘Now have procalcitonin testing which is a positive…’Introduction of biomarkers such as urinary antigens and procalcitonin as a serum marker for bacterial coinfection for COVID-19 patients and as a tool to guide antibiotic cessation/de-escalation.
Experimental agents

High volume of queries

Adverse drug reactions

Prescription of agents not available in Ireland

Unlicensed use of some agents

‘Arrhythmia / prolonged QT related to azithromycin use in COVID patients’

‘At the initial stages, difficulty ordering sufficient supply of [hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin], kaletra. No longer in use now for COVID. High volume of queries initially, e.g. whether to use IVIG, tocilizumab, safety of reconstituting toclizumab at ward level.’

Regular updates from the AMRIC team of COVID-19 treatment guidance based on evidence from ongoing trials, which are cascaded for implementation locally.

Promotion and implementation of guidelines

Introduction of database for experimental agents and antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients.

AM supply
Shortage of co-amoxiclav/other antibiotics‘Drug shortages in particular co-amoxiclav 625mg tablets’

Updating local empirical guidelines in view of AM shortages.

Regular updates from the AMRIC team with regard to AM shortages, which were cascaded nationally.

Communication

Reduced sharing of information between local teams

Face-to-face educational meetings ceased

Change in work patterns – liaising with on-call teams

New doctors

‘change in working hours and dealing with on call teams’

‘Reduced sharing of information due to confidentiality/nature of management/unknowns was frustrating/challenging.’

Development and use of posters, chart stickers, decision algorithms and visuals to improve AMS in COVID-19 pathways.

Use of electronic media/resources:

Use of applications to disseminate information

Dissemination of updates by e-mail

To facilitate virtual ward rounds and handover

To facilitate virtual educational meetings

ESBL, ESBL producer.

Main themes identified in free-text reporting of unexpected AMS-related occurrences and AMS interventions introduced as a result of COVID-19 Reduced adherence to AM prescribing policy Increased use of restricted AMs Increased use of broad-spectrum agents Increased use of multiple agents Increased prescription duration Increased use of once-daily AMs, e.g. ceftriaxone (one respondent reported increased C. difficile as a result) Difficulty de-escalating AM regimens ‘Duplication of antimicrobials, use of restricted antimicrobials, prolonged course of antimicrobials' ‘Less adherence to guidelines, more empiric, broad spectrum prescribing of antibiotics in COVID-19 positive patients ‘Widespread prescription of antimicrobials without a clear indication for same due to concern for super-imposed bacterial infections in COVID-19 pneumonia; slow to stop/review [antibiotic] choice despite lack of evidence of bacterial infections; slow to revert to standard guidelines when patient is COVID −ve’ ‘…there has been an increase in once daily antimicrobials for COVID-19 positive patients to treat secondary bacterial infection (ceftriaxone and levofloxacin). In patients in whom were initially managed on the COVID-19 pathway who subsequently tested negative with another alternative diagnosis we initially found it difficult to get these patients onto the appropriate antimicrobials for new diagnosis (e.g. co-amoxiclav for [community acquired] pneumonia, co-amoxiclav for urinary tract infection etc)…’ Introduction of specific AM guidelines for COVID-19 patients. Use of preauthorization or restricted prescribing for experimental agents. Extended use of once-daily dosing regimens. Frequent review of antiviral and AM therapy in COVID-19 pathway. Follow-up AMS review of patients with ‘SARS-CoV-2 not detected’. Promotion of HSE guidance on specific antivirals and audit of use to assess prescribing patterns. Promotion of iv-oral switch to reduce contact time. Introduction of database for experimental agents and antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients. Decreased screening for MDRO Increased C. difficile cases MDRO outbreaks ‘(1) Increase in C. difficile cases, likely related to ceftriaxone administration. (2) Increase in MDRO i.e. ESBL, VRE & MRSA. Likely more relates to hand hygiene & PPE rather than AMS. (3) Reduced screening for MDRO due to use of laboratory diagnostics & staff for COVID-19 PCR, reduced nurses performing swabs, prioritisation of tasks in favour of COVID-19.’ Work in conjunction with the IPC teams and the microbiology laboratory. Continuous education on hand hygiene and other IPC interventions. High volume of queries Adverse drug reactions Prescription of agents not available in Ireland Unlicensed use of some agents Arrhythmia / prolonged QT related to azithromycin use in COVID patients ‘At the initial stages, difficulty ordering sufficient supply of [hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin], kaletra. No longer in use now for COVID. High volume of queries initially, e.g. whether to use IVIG, tocilizumab, safety of reconstituting toclizumab at ward level.’ Regular updates from the AMRIC team of COVID-19 treatment guidance based on evidence from ongoing trials, which are cascaded for implementation locally. Promotion and implementation of guidelines Introduction of database for experimental agents and antibiotic prescribing in COVID-19 patients. Updating local empirical guidelines in view of AM shortages. Regular updates from the AMRIC team with regard to AM shortages, which were cascaded nationally. Reduced sharing of information between local teams Face-to-face educational meetings ceased Change in work patterns – liaising with on-call teams New doctors ‘change in working hours and dealing with on call teams’ ‘Reduced sharing of information due to confidentiality/nature of management/unknowns was frustrating/challenging.’ Development and use of posters, chart stickers, decision algorithms and visuals to improve AMS in COVID-19 pathways. Use of electronic media/resources: Use of applications to disseminate information Dissemination of updates by e-mail To facilitate virtual ward rounds and handover To facilitate virtual educational meetings ESBL, ESBL producer. The key challenges to AMS brought about by COVID-19 were mainly due to: the lack of resources as a result of re-allocation to COVID-19 planning and management; the difficulties posed by infection prevention and control (IPC) restrictions and social distancing in delivering ward rounds, performing audits, providing education and holding committee meetings; and increased use of AMs due to the difficulty in diagnosis of secondary infections, particularly in patients with severe COVID-19. These challenges for effective delivery of AMS programmes reflect the concerns expressed by Rawson et al. Our findings suggest that successful delivery of AMS in the COVID-19 era requires further resourcing in three key areas: technology, diagnostics and guideline development. Innovative utilization of information and communication technologies (ICT) facilitated education, AMS meetings, virtual ward rounds and clinics as well as handover meetings. This was most noted in hospitals where electronic prescribing and health records are available. Evidence points to the benefit that ICT can have on AMS programmes in terms of increased productivity, more effective case finding, workflow auditing and optimization of infection management. Furthermore, early literature suggests that electronic healthcare platforms improve the management and review of COVID-19 patients. Consistent with published literature to date, the difficulty in diagnosis of bacterial/fungal coinfections, particularly in patients with severe COVID-19, resulted in reports of increased use of empirical AM treatment and consequently increased risks of Clostridioides difficile infection and emergence of MDRO. Further research into the use of procalcitonin and other biomarkers in the COVID-19 patient cohort to provide diagnostic stewardship is required as these may be useful tools to decrease inappropriate prescribing and support early de-escalation of AM therapy., Sustaining MDRO surveillance and compliance with IPC protocols are key areas to focus on going forward. Lastly, national guidance documents were extremely beneficial, particularly in hospitals with less AMS resources, which underlines the importance of further similar evidence-based guidance on the treatment of other infections. Our survey contributes to an evolving literature on the impact of COVID-19 on AMS and interventions to sustain and deliver effective AMS programmes during this time. Further research is required to quantify the unintended consequences for AMR and the success of different AMS strategies and interventions in reducing AMR in the pandemic and post-pandemic environment. Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

1.  Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities/Programs in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Diane Ashiru-Oredope; Frances Kerr; Stephen Hughes; Jonathan Urch; Marisa Lanzman; Ting Yau; Alison Cockburn; Rakhee Patel; Adel Sheikh; Cairine Gormley; Aneeka Chavda; Tejal Vaghela; Ceri Phillips; Nicholas Reid; Aaron Brady
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23

2.  Evaluation of procalcitonin-guided antimicrobial stewardship in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Authors:  Maria Calderon; Ang Li; Juan Carlos Bazo-Alvarez; Jonathan Dennis; Kenneth F Baker; Ina Schim van der Loeff; Aidan T Hanrath; Richard Capstick; Brendan A I Payne; Daniel Weiand; Ewan Hunter; Ulrich Schwab
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 3.  The Collateral Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Status of Carbapenemase-Producing Pathogens.

Authors:  Carole Ayoub Moubareck; Dalal Hammoudi Halat
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  Beyond the Pandemic: The Value of Antimicrobial Stewardship.

Authors:  Souha S Kanj; Paula Ramirez; Camilla Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-27

5.  The impact of COVID-19 on antimicrobial stewardship programme implementation in hospitals - an exploration informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Authors:  N Hashad; D Stewart; D Perumal; N Abdulrazzaq; A P Tonna
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 8.944

Review 6.  Implications of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Emergence of Antimicrobial Resistance: Adjusting the Response to Future Outbreaks.

Authors:  Doris Rusic; Marino Vilovic; Josipa Bukic; Dario Leskur; Ana Seselja Perisin; Marko Kumric; Dinko Martinovic; Ana Petric; Darko Modun; Josko Bozic
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10

Review 7.  Antimicrobial Use in COVID-19 Patients in the First Phase of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Wenjuan Cong; Ak Narayan Poudel; Nour Alhusein; Hexing Wang; Guiqing Yao; Helen Lambert
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-19

8.  Risk factors for isolation of multi-drug resistant organisms in coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Hyo-Ju Son; Tark Kim; Eunjung Lee; Se Yoon Park; Shinae Yu; Hyo-Lim Hong; Min-Chul Kim; Sun In Hong; Seongman Bae; Min Jae Kim; Sung-Han Kim; Ji Hyun Yun; Kyeong Min Jo; Yu-Mi Lee; Seungjae Lee; Jung Wan Park; Min Hyok Jeon; Tae Hyong Kim; Eun Ju Choo
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 9.  COVID-19: a boon or a bane for the microbiologists.

Authors:  Vasanthapuram Ravi; Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Chand Wattal; Reena Raveendran
Journal:  Indian J Med Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 0.985

10.  Antibiotic prescribing patterns in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: lessons from the first wave.

Authors:  Brendan O'Kelly; Colm Cronin; David Connellan; Sean Griffin; Stephen Peter Connolly; Jonathan McGrath; Aoife G Cotter; Tara McGinty; Eavan G Muldoon; Gerard Sheehan; Walter Cullen; Peter Doran; Tina McHugh; Louise Vidal; Gordana Avramovic; John S Lambert
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-06-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.