Literature DB >> 33011418

Inter-individual and age-dependent variability in simulated electric fields induced by conventional transcranial electrical stimulation.

Daria Antonenko1, Ulrike Grittner2, Guilherme Saturnino3, Till Nierhaus4, Axel Thielscher5, Agnes Flöel6.   

Abstract

Variations in head and brain anatomy determine the strength and distribution of electrical fields in humans and may account for inconsistent behavioral and neurophysiological results in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) studies. However, it is insufficiently understood which anatomical features contribute to the variability of the modelled electric fields, and if their impact varies across age groups. In the present study, we tested the associations of global head anatomy, indexed by extra- and intra-cranial volumes, with electric field measures, comparing young and older adults. We modelled six "conventional" electrode montages typically used in tES studies using SimNIBS software in 40 individuals (20 young, 20 older adults; 20-35, 64-79 years). We extracted individual electric field strengths and focality values for each montage to identify tissue volumes that account for variability of the induced electric fields in both groups. Linear mixed models explained most of the inter-individual variability of the overall induced field strength in the brain, but not of field focality. Higher absolute head volume and relative volume of skin, skull and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were associated with lower overall electric field strengths. Additionally, we found interactions of age group with head volume and CSF, indicating that this relationship was mitigated in the older group. Our results demonstrate the importance to adjust brain stimulation not only according to brain atrophy, but also to additional parameters of head anatomy. Future studies need to elucidate the mechanisms underlying individual variability of tES effects in young and older adults, and verify the usefulness of the proposed models in terms of neurophysiology and behavior in empirical studies.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Biophysical modelling; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Older Adults; Simulation; Transcranial direct current

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33011418     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Detection of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Aftereffects Is Improved by Considering the Individual Electric Field Strength and Self-Rated Sleepiness.

Authors:  Iris Steinmann; Kathleen A Williams; Melanie Wilke; Andrea Antal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 2.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Alicia M Goodwill; Beth Ann O'Brien; Brenda Rapp; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.184

4.  Estimation of individually induced e-field strength during transcranial electric stimulation using the head circumference.

Authors:  Daria Antonenko; Ulrike Grittner; Oula Puonti; Agnes Flöel; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.184

5.  Electrode montage-dependent intracranial variability in electric fields induced by cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Interindividual variability of electric fields during transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS).

Authors:  Jill von Conta; Florian H Kasten; Branislava Ćurčić-Blake; André Aleman; Axel Thielscher; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In vivo Measurements of Electric Fields During Cranial Electrical Stimulation in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Minmin Wang; Tao Feng; Hongjie Jiang; Junming Zhu; Wuwei Feng; Pratik Y Chhatbar; Jianmin Zhang; Shaomin Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Randomized trial of cognitive training and brain stimulation in non-demented older adults.

Authors:  Daria Antonenko; Friederike Thams; Ulrike Grittner; Jessica Uhrich; Franka Glöckner; Shu-Chen Li; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2022-02-23

Review 9.  Mini-review: The Role of the Cerebellum in Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Elinor Tzvi; Sebastian Loens; Opher Donchin
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.648

10.  Standard Non-Personalized Electric Field Modeling of Twenty Typical tDCS Electrode Configurations via the Computational Finite Element Method: Contributions and Limitations of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Michael A Nitsche; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Raquel Martín Riquel; Rafael Tomás Andújar Barroso; José Ramón Alameda Bailén; Jesús Carlos García Palomeque; Guadalupe Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.