Amar Rangan1, Stephen D Brealey2, Ada Keding2, Belen Corbacho2, Matthew Northgraves2, Lucksy Kottam3, Lorna Goodchild3, Cynthia Srikesavan4, Saleema Rex2, Charalambos P Charalambous5, Nigel Hanchard6, Alison Armstrong7, Andrew Brooksbank8, Andrew Carr4, Cushla Cooper4, Joseph J Dias7, Iona Donnelly8, Catherine Hewitt2, Sarah E Lamb4, Catriona McDaid2, Gerry Richardson9, Sara Rodgers2, Emma Sharp8, Sally Spencer10, David Torgerson2, Francine Toye11. 1. York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK. Electronic address: amar.rangan@york.ac.uk. 2. York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. 3. The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK. 4. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 5. Department of Orthopaedics, Blackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, UK; School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. 6. School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK. 7. University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. 8. Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK. 9. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK. 10. Postgraduate Medical Institute, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK. 11. Physiotherapy Research Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manipulation under anaesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release are costly and invasive treatments for frozen shoulder, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. We compared these two surgical interventions with early structured physiotherapy plus steroid injection. METHODS: In this multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised trial, patients referred to secondary care for treatment of primary frozen shoulder were recruited from 35 hospital sites in the UK. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with unilateral frozen shoulder, characterised by restriction of passive external rotation (≥50%) in the affected shoulder. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive manipulation under anaesthesia, arthroscopic capsular release, or early structured physiotherapy. In manipulation under anaesthesia, the surgeon manipulated the affected shoulder to stretch and tear the tight capsule while the participant was under general anaesthesia, supplemented by a steroid injection. Arthroscopic capsular release, also done under general anaesthesia, involved surgically dividing the contracted anterior capsule in the rotator interval, followed by manipulation, with optional steroid injection. Both forms of surgery were followed by postprocedural physiotherapy. Early structured physiotherapy involved mobilisation techniques and a graduated home exercise programme supplemented by a steroid injection. Both early structured physiotherapy and postprocedural physiotherapy involved 12 sessions during up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS; 0-48) at 12 months after randomisation, analysed by initial randomisation group. We sought a target difference of 5 OSS points between physiotherapy and either form of surgery, or 4 points between manipulation and capsular release. The trial registration is ISRCTN48804508. FINDINGS:Between April 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2017, we screened 914 patients, of whom 503 (55%) were randomly assigned. At 12 months, OSS data were available for 189 (94%) of 201 participants assigned to manipulation (mean estimate 38·3 points, 95% CI 36·9 to 39·7), 191 (94%) of 203 participants assigned to capsular release (40·3 points, 38·9 to 41·7), and 93 (94%) of 99 participants assigned to physiotherapy (37·2 points, 35·3 to 39·2). The mean group differences were 2·01 points (0·10 to 3·91) between the capsular release and manipulation groups, 3·06 points (0·71 to 5·41) between capsular release and physiotherapy, and 1·05 points (-1·28 to 3·39) between manipulation and physiotherapy. Eight serious adverse events were reported with capsular release and two with manipulation. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, manipulation under anaesthesia had the highest probability of being cost-effective (0·8632, compared with 0·1366 for physiotherapy and 0·0002 for capsular release). INTERPRETATION: All mean differences on the assessment of shoulder pain and function (OSS) at the primary endpoint of 12 months were less than the target differences. Therefore, none of the three interventions were clinically superior. Arthoscopic capsular release carried higher risks, and manipulation under anaesthesia was the most cost-effective. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Manipulation under anaesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release are costly and invasive treatments for frozen shoulder, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. We compared these two surgical interventions with early structured physiotherapy plus steroid injection. METHODS: In this multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised trial, patients referred to secondary care for treatment of primary frozen shoulder were recruited from 35 hospital sites in the UK. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with unilateral frozen shoulder, characterised by restriction of passive external rotation (≥50%) in the affected shoulder. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive manipulation under anaesthesia, arthroscopic capsular release, or early structured physiotherapy. In manipulation under anaesthesia, the surgeon manipulated the affected shoulder to stretch and tear the tight capsule while the participant was under general anaesthesia, supplemented by a steroid injection. Arthroscopic capsular release, also done under general anaesthesia, involved surgically dividing the contracted anterior capsule in the rotator interval, followed by manipulation, with optional steroid injection. Both forms of surgery were followed by postprocedural physiotherapy. Early structured physiotherapy involved mobilisation techniques and a graduated home exercise programme supplemented by a steroid injection. Both early structured physiotherapy and postprocedural physiotherapy involved 12 sessions during up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS; 0-48) at 12 months after randomisation, analysed by initial randomisation group. We sought a target difference of 5 OSS points between physiotherapy and either form of surgery, or 4 points between manipulation and capsular release. The trial registration is ISRCTN48804508. FINDINGS: Between April 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2017, we screened 914 patients, of whom 503 (55%) were randomly assigned. At 12 months, OSS data were available for 189 (94%) of 201 participants assigned to manipulation (mean estimate 38·3 points, 95% CI 36·9 to 39·7), 191 (94%) of 203 participants assigned to capsular release (40·3 points, 38·9 to 41·7), and 93 (94%) of 99 participants assigned to physiotherapy (37·2 points, 35·3 to 39·2). The mean group differences were 2·01 points (0·10 to 3·91) between the capsular release and manipulation groups, 3·06 points (0·71 to 5·41) between capsular release and physiotherapy, and 1·05 points (-1·28 to 3·39) between manipulation and physiotherapy. Eight serious adverse events were reported with capsular release and two with manipulation. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, manipulation under anaesthesia had the highest probability of being cost-effective (0·8632, compared with 0·1366 for physiotherapy and 0·0002 for capsular release). INTERPRETATION: All mean differences on the assessment of shoulder pain and function (OSS) at the primary endpoint of 12 months were less than the target differences. Therefore, none of the three interventions were clinically superior. Arthoscopic capsular release carried higher risks, and manipulation under anaesthesia was the most cost-effective. FUNDING: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Authors: Neal L Millar; Adam Meakins; Filip Struyf; Elaine Willmore; Abigail L Campbell; Paul D Kirwan; Moeed Akbar; Laura Moore; Jonathan C Ronquillo; George A C Murrell; Scott A Rodeo Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-09-08 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Dora Janela; Fabíola Costa; Maria Molinos; Robert G Moulder; Jorge Lains; Gerard E Francisco; Virgílio Bento; Steven P Cohen; Fernando Dias Correia Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Brett P Dyer; Claire Burton; Trishna Rathod-Mistry; Milisa Blagojevic-Bucknall; Danielle A van der Windt Journal: Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Date: 2021-07-14
Authors: Samuel P Mackenzie; Michael McLean; Miloš Spasojevic; Rui Niu; Lisa Kruse; Jasmin Gwynne; Allan Young; Benjamin Cass Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-11-13