Literature DB >> 33010739

The contribution of linguistic and visual cues to physiological synchrony and empathic accuracy.

Karine Jospe1, Shir Genzer1, Nathalie Klein Selle1, Desmond Ong2, Jamil Zaki3, Anat Perry4.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate concerning the contribution of different aspects of empathy to achieving an accurate understanding of others. In this study, we aimed to better comprehend the roles of experience sharing and mentalizing using a modified empathic-accuracy task. We analyzed the unique contribution of each of these mechanisms with an explicit cognitive report as well as an affective physiological synchrony measurement. First, we recorded the emotional autobiographical stories told by participants ("targets", N = 28). Then, the targets watched their own videos as their heart rate (HR) was measured, and they reported on both a continuous and a discrete emotion scale what they felt while relaying the story. Next, we collected HR data from new participants ("observers", N = 72) as they similarly rated the targets' valence and discrete emotional states. In order to test the contribution of sensorimotor cues and contextual cues to empathic accuracy, observers viewed some videos with audio, others without audio, and listened to a third set of only the audio. We hypothesized that empathic accuracy-a cognitive measure that is a proxy for mentalizing and is operationalized by the correlation between a target's reported emotions and an observer's inference of those emotions-would be greater when linguistic information is present. We also hypothesized that physiological synchrony, a proxy for experience sharing, would be greater in the video-only condition, which was limited to sensorimotor cues to infer the other's emotional state. Indeed, we found that empathic accuracy was greater when auditory information was present, and that HR synchrony was more prevalent when visual cues were presented alone. Having both information streams together did not enhance accuracy, yet it was the only condition in which both behavioral empathic-accuracy measures correlated with HR synchrony. This study provides evidence that separate experience sharing and mentalizing pathways are active in the same task.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empathic accuracy; Empathy; Experience sharing; Mentalizing; Synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33010739     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  4 in total

1.  Physicians prescribe fewer analgesics during night shifts than day shifts.

Authors:  Shoham Choshen-Hillel; Ido Sadras; Tom Gordon-Hecker; Shir Genzer; David Rekhtman; Eugene M Caruso; Koby L Clements; Adrienne Ohler; David Gozal; Salomon Israel; Anat Perry; Alex Gileles-Hillel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Modeling emotion in complex stories: the Stanford Emotional Narratives Dataset.

Authors:  Desmond C Ong; Zhengxuan Wu; Tan Zhi-Xuan; Marianne Reddan; Isabella Kahhale; Alison Mattek; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Affect Comput       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 13.990

3.  Mu rhythm suppression over sensorimotor regions is associated with greater empathic accuracy.

Authors:  Shir Genzer; Desmond C Ong; Jamil Zaki; Anat Perry
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.235

4.  Synchrony During Online Encounters Affects Social Affiliation and Theory of Mind but Not Empathy.

Authors:  Chiara Basile; Serena Lecce; Floris Tijmen van Vugt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.