Literature DB >> 33010581

Patients with acromegaly might not be at higher risk for dopamine agonist-induced impulse control disorders than those with prolactinomas.

Hande Mefkure Ozkaya1, Serdar Sahin1, Ozge Polat Korkmaz1, Emre Durcan1, Humeyra Rekali Sahin2, Emir Celik3, Burc Cagri Poyraz4, Pinar Kadioglu5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of impulse control disorders (ICD) and psychiatric symptoms in patients with acromegaly receiving dopamine agonists (DA) in comparison with those with prolactinoma, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFA), and healthy controls (HC).
DESIGN: Forty patients with acromegaly, 40 with prolactinoma, 38 with NFA, and 32 HCs were included. All patients and controls were evaluated using the revised version of the Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview (MIDI-R), Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R) questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI).
RESULTS: We detected ICD associated with DAs in two patients with acromegaly (5%) and three patients (7.5%) with prolactinoma. All patients' symptoms resolved after discontinuation of the drug. While the mean DA dose was higher in patients with acromegaly than prolactinomas (p < 0.05), no difference was detected in terms of ICD prevalence between two groups (p > 0.05). SCL-90 depression and interpersonal sensitivity subscale positivity was higher in patients with NFA than HCs. Patients with prolactinoma had higher obsession and interpersonal sensitivity positivity and those with NFA had higher somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, and depression positivity as compared to patients with acromegaly (p < 0.05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: Although DA dose was significantly higher in patients with acromegaly, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of DA-related ICD. The higher prevalence of positive screening in SCL-90 in patients with NFA in comparison to HCs supports the hypothesis that the presence of a pituitary adenoma per se might cause significant psychiatric symptoms.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromegaly; Dopamine agonist; Impulse control disorder; Prevalence

Year:  2020        PMID: 33010581     DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2020.101356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res        ISSN: 1096-6374            Impact factor:   2.372


  3 in total

Review 1.  Impulse control disorders in hyperprolactinemic patients on dopamine agonist therapy.

Authors:  Anahid Hamidianjahromi; Nicholas A Tritos
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  11C-methionine PET aids localization of microprolactinomas in patients with intolerance or resistance to dopamine agonist therapy.

Authors:  W A Bashari; M van der Meulen; J MacFarlane; D Gillett; R Senanayake; L Serban; A S Powlson; A M Brooke; D J Scoffings; J Jones; D G O'Donovan; J Tysome; T Santarius; N Donnelly; I Boros; F Aigbirhio; S Jefferies; H K Cheow; I A Mendichovszky; A G Kolias; R Mannion; O Koulouri; M Gurnell
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Approach to the Patient With Treatment-resistant Acromegaly.

Authors:  Eva C Coopmans; Aart J van der Lely; Sebastian J C M M Neggers
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.