Literature DB >> 3301053

The hemodynamic effects of sotalol and quinidine: analysis by use of rest and exercise gated radionuclide angiography.

J J Mahmarian, M S Verani, T Hohmann, R Hill, B C Thornton, R Bolli, J B Young, R Roberts, C M Pratt.   

Abstract

This placebo-controlled, double-blind trial compared the hemodynamic effects of sotalol and quinidine with the use of rest and exercise gated radionuclide angiography. Patients had frequent ventricular premature depolarizations (greater than or equal to 30 VPDs/hour) and depressed cardiac function (mean ejection fraction 43 +/- 15%). Resting left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume index increased (p less than .002, p less than .001, respectively) during sotalol therapy, associated with a concomitant fall in heart rate (p less than .001). Quinidine also increased mean left ventricular ejection fraction, but less so than did sotalol (p less than .05). Quinidine significantly decreased left ventricular end-diastolic (p less than .05) and end-systolic (p less than .002) volumes, but had no effect on stroke volume index or heart rate. Neither drug affected cardiac index. Quinidine resulted in no symptomatic deterioration in left ventricular function or serious arrhythmia aggravation. In contrast, five patients on sotalol developed either decompensated congestive heart failure (two patients), arrhythmia aggravation (two patients), or hypotension associated with bradyarrhythmia (one patient). These patients had a unique hemodynamic profile that can be used to identify patients likely to have a poor outcome on sotalol. This profile reflected a lack of cardiac reserve, characterized by an inability to increase stroke volume and cardiac output with supine bicycle exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3301053     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.76.2.324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  9 in total

Review 1.  Role of nuclear cardiac imaging in myocardial infarction: postinfarction risk stratification.

Authors:  John J Mahmarian; Girish Dwivedi; Tultul Lahiri
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Comparative hemodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  M Sami
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  Combining antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable devices therapy: benefits and outcome.

Authors:  M Santini; C Pandozi; R Ricci
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Sotalol versus class I and II antiarrhythmic agents.

Authors:  J J Hanyok; D J MacNeil
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.727

5.  Sotalol in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  H J Trappe; H Klein; P Lichtlen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Hemodynamic effects of the D- and L-isomers of sotalol on normal myocardium.

Authors:  H M Hoffmeister; M Beyer; L Seipel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 7.  Sotalol. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  A Fitton; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  [Comparison of the hemodynamics effects of D-sotalol and D,L-sotalol].

Authors:  H M Hoffmeister; L Seipel
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1988-05-16

9.  Acute echocardiographic effects of sotalol on ventricular systolic function in dogs with ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Lance C Visser; Joanna L Kaplan; Satoko Nishimura; Catherine T Gunther-Harrington; Catherine Bélanger; Maureen S Oldach; Joshua A Stern; Mikaela S Mueller
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.333

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.