| Literature DB >> 33009946 |
Micky M Mwamuye1, David Odongo2, Yvette Kazungu3, Fatuma Kindoro3, Paul Gwakisa3, Richard P Bishop4, Ard M Nijhof5, Isaiah Obara1.
Abstract
Buffalo-derived Theileria parva can 'break through' the immunity induced by the infection and treatment vaccination method (ITM) in cattle. However, no such 'breakthroughs' have been reported in northern Tanzania where there has been long and widespread ITM use in pastoralist cattle, and the Cape buffalo (Syncerus caffer) is also present. We studied the exposure of vaccinated and unvaccinated cattle in northern Tanzania to buffalo-derived T. parva using p67 gene polymorphisms and compared this to its distribution in vaccinated cattle exposed to buffalo-derived T. parva in central Kenya, where vaccine 'breakthroughs' have been reported. Additionally, we analysed the CD8+ T cell target antigen Tp2 for positive selection. Our results showed that 10% of the p67 sequences from Tanzanian cattle (n = 39) had a buffalo type p67 (allele 4), an allele that is rare among East African isolates studied so far. The percentage of buffalo-derived p67 alleles observed in Kenyan cattle comprised 19% of the parasites (n = 36), with two different p67 alleles (2 and 3) of presumptive buffalo origin. The Tp2 protein was generally conserved with only three Tp2 variants from Tanzania (n = 33) and five from Kenya (n = 40). Two Tanzanian Tp2 variants and two Kenyan Tp2 variants were identical to variants present in the trivalent Muguga vaccine. Tp2 evolutionary analysis did not show evidence for positive selection within previously mapped epitope coding sites. The p67 data indicates that some ITM-vaccinated cattle are protected against disease induced by a buffalo-derived T. parva challenge in northern Tanzania and suggests that the parasite genotype may represent one factor explaining this.Entities:
Keywords: Antigen diversity; Cape Buffalo; Live vaccine; Theileria parva; Tp2; p67
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33009946 PMCID: PMC7578158 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-020-06902-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Fig. 1Map showing the origin of blood samples used in this study from in Kenya and Tanzania
P67 allele type and GenBank sequence similarity search for the unique p67 predicted proteins in the study samples
| Cattle type p67 | Buffalo type p67 | NCBI BLASTp hits | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allele 1 | Allele 2 | Allele 3 | Allele 4 | Identity | Accession no. | Isolate origin | |
| Tanzania | |||||||
| Buffalo | |||||||
| MT344093 [1] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344094 [1] | + | 100.00% | Buffalo | ||||
| MT344095 [1] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344096 [1] | + | 100.00% | Buffalo | ||||
| MT344097 [1] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344098 [1] | + | 99.63% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344099 [1] | + | 99.25% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344100 [1] | + | 98.14% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344101 [1] | + | 99.25% | Cattle | ||||
| MT344102 [1] | + | 95.15% | Cattle | ||||
| Cattle | |||||||
| MT365016 [33] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365017 [1] | + | 99.31% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365018 [1] | + | 99.64% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365019 [2] | + | 95.97% | Buffalo | ||||
| MT365020 [2] | + | 96.31% | Buffalo | ||||
| Kenya | |||||||
| Cattle | |||||||
| MT365005 [1] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365006 [1] | + | 99.70% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365007 [1] | + | 99.69% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365009 [29] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365011 [1] | + | 100.00% | Buffalo | ||||
| MT365012 [1] | + | 99.61% | Buffalo | ||||
| MT365013 [1] | + | 100.00% | Cattle | ||||
| MT365014 [1] | + | 99.56% | Cattle | ||||
The number enclosed [ ] represents the number of alleles
Epitope polymorphisms within predicted p67 amino acid sequences in this study
| P67 antibody epitope | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Allele type | Accession number | TpM12 | AR22.7 |
| 1 | XP_763305 (Graham et al. 2005) | TKEEVPPADLSDQVP | LQPGKTS |
| MT365016–018a | |||
| MT365009c | |||
| 2 | AAB06703 (Nene et al. | ||
| MT344097b | |||
| MT344093b | |||
| MT344101–102b | |||
| MT365005–006c | |||
| MT365007c | |||
| 3 | AFU34359 (Sibeko et al. | ||
| MT344098–099 b | |||
| MT365011c | |||
| MT344100b | |||
| MT344094–096b | |||
| MT365012–014c | |||
| 4 | AFU34364 (Sibeko et al. | ||
| MT365019–020a | |||
aSequences amplified from Tanzanian cattle
bSequences amplified from Tanzanian buffalo
cSequences amplified from Kenyan cattle
(-) Dashes represent amino acid residues that are identical to the reference sequence
Fig. 2Percentage pairwise amino acid identity in the unique Tp2 sequences among the different sample groups. Box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles; median is represented by thick lines across the boxes; crosses represent sample means; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. The matrix used for this plot is available in Supplementary Table 1
Epitope variants identified in this study based on the predicted Tp2 protein translations
| Epitope variant | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tp227-37 | Tp239-48 | Tp249-59 | Tp296-103 | Tp298-106 | Tp2137-147 | |
| Reference | SHEELKKLGML | DGFDRDALF | KSSHGMGKVGK | FAQSLVCVL | QSLVCVLMK | KTSIPNPCKW |
| Tanzania | ||||||
| Cattle | ||||||
| -D---N----- | --- | |||||
| Buffalo | ||||||
| -D----E---- | -----QR-- | LT-KSMSE--R | ----IY--V | --IY--VKN | -GDA----T- | |
| -DN--DT-G-L | PDL-KNR-- | LT------I-R | L-A-IK--S | A-IK--SHH | -QK-----D-* | |
| - | ----------R | -VE-IM--I | E-IM--IK- | -EDV----D- | ||
| -D---NK---- | -------R--* | |||||
| -G---N-----* | ||||||
| Kenya | ||||||
| Cattle | ||||||
| -DD----M--I | P---KEV-- | ---KA-TTT-- | -G--IK--V | --IK--VQ- | NNN-L----- | |
| - | ----------R | -VE-IM--I | E-IM--IK- | -EDV----D- | ||
| - | ||||||
| -H--------- | ||||||
| -D---N----- | ||||||
(-) Dashes represent amino acid residues that are identical to the reference sequence. Only epitopes with variant residues are displayed
(*) Depicts novel variants identified in this study
Italicised variants are described in Kerario et al. (2019) while all other variants have previously been identified in Pelle et al. (2011)
Fig. 3Tp2 predicted amino acid sequences from this study. The number enclosed [ ] represents the number of alleles. Underlined accession numbers are buffalo-derived T. parva Tp2 sequences. Thickened lines underneath the reference sequence show respective epitope mapped positions on the T. parva (Muguga) stock. (*) denotes codon suggested to be under positive selection based on Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis (Table 4) (Yang et al. 2005)
Evaluation of model fit by the Akaike information criterion (AIC), model parameter estimates and positively selected sites under the M8 site model using Bayes empirical Bayes (BEB) analysis
| Model fit | Estimate of parameters | Positive sites | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tp2 sample | Model | K | LnL | AIC | p0 | p1 | p2 | ||
| Tanzania | M8 | 44 | − 1714.80 | 3517.60 | 4.03249 | 0.9680 | 0.03020 | 83 H 0.519, 101 V 0.557, 130 S 0.925, 138 T 0.762 | |
| M7 | 42 | − 1716.84 | 3517.69 | Not allowed | |||||
| Kenya | M2a | 48 | − 1309.83 | 2715.65 | 37.9162 | 0.6986 | 0.2763 | 0.02511 | |
| M1a | 46 | − 1315.46 | 2722.92 | 0.6627 | 0.3373 | Not allowed | |||
| M8 | 48 | − 1309.15 | 2714.30 | 35.4258 | 0.9736 | 0.02644 | 32 N 0.646, 105 M 0.869, 130 S 0.824, 138 T 0.645, 159 T 0.995** | ||
| M7 | 46 | − 1315.70 | 2723.41 | Not allowed | |||||
K denotes number of estimated parameters; LnL denotes maximised log likelihoods; p0 (purifying), p1(neutral) and p2 (positive) indicate the proportion of codons belonging to each site class, while ω represents the dN/dS for the positive selection site class only. (**) denotes > 99% posterior probabilities of positive selection. The codon numbers are identified with reference to the T. parva Muguga Tp2 antigen