Literature DB >> 33009685

Reconsidering alcohol treatment non-responders: psychosocial functioning among heavy drinkers 3 years following treatment.

Matthew R Pearson1, Adam D Wilson2, Dylan K Richards1, Katie Witkiewitz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Psychosocial functioning among individuals who exceed low-risk drinking limits (exceed three to four standard drinks for women/men) is heterogeneous. Among those who receive treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD), recent research found that more than one-half of those who exceeded low-risk limits (i.e. treatment non-responders) reported good psychosocial functioning, commensurate with those who were abstinent or low-risk drinkers (i.e. treatment responders) up to 1 year following treatment. This study aimed to determine if good levels of psychosocial functioning are maintained beyond 1 year.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of 3-year follow-up data from Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatment to Client Heterogeneity) and the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions study (COMBINE), multi-site alcohol clinical trials conducted in the United States.
SETTING: Eleven sites in COMBINE and nine sites in Project MATCH. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with AUD from COMBINE and Project MATCH (n = 1383 and n = 1726) characterized in terms of drinking/functioning at 1-year follow-up and retained at 3-year (n = 641 and n = 790) post-treatment follow-ups. MEASUREMENTS: Alcohol consumption measured by Form-90 and psychosocial functioning assessed by various instruments at 3 years post-treatment
FINDINGS: High-functioning non-responders at 1 year post-treatment maintained a high level of functioning 2 years later and were not significantly different from the abstainers/low-risk drinkers on any functional outcomes (e.g. SF12 Mental Health Mean difference: -1.38 [95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.34, 1.57), SF12 Physical Health Mean difference: -0.43 (95% CI = -2.28, 3.13)].
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-half of those who engage in some heavy drinking in the year following treatment for alcohol use disorder appear to maintain high levels of psychosocial functioning up to 3 years following treatment. © 2020 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol treatment; alcohol use disorder; heavy drinking; latent profile analysis; psychosocial functioning; treatment response

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33009685      PMCID: PMC8017002          DOI: 10.1111/add.15280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  17 in total

1.  The psychosocial functioning inventory.

Authors:  M A Feragne; R Longabaugh; J F Stevenson
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Profiles of recovery from alcohol use disorder at three years following treatment: can the definition of recovery be extended to include high functioning heavy drinkers?

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; Adam D Wilson; Matthew R Pearson; Kevin S Montes; Megan Kirouac; Corey R Roos; Kevin A Hallgren; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Finding success in failure: using latent profile analysis to examine heterogeneity in psychosocial functioning among heavy drinkers following treatment.

Authors:  Adam D Wilson; Adrian J Bravo; Matthew R Pearson; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  The effect of alcohol treatment on social costs of alcohol dependence: results from the COMBINE study.

Authors:  Gary A Zarkin; Jeremy W Bray; Arnie Aldridge; Michael Mills; Ron A Cisler; David Couper; James R McKay; Stephanie O'Malley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report.

Authors:  L R Derogatis; N Melisaratos
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  A quantification of the alcohol use-consequences association in college student and clinical populations: A large, multi-sample study.

Authors:  Mark A Prince; Matthew R Pearson; Adrian J Bravo; Kevin S Montes
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Raymond F Anton; Stephanie S O'Malley; Domenic A Ciraulo; Ron A Cisler; David Couper; Dennis M Donovan; David R Gastfriend; James D Hosking; Bankole A Johnson; Joseph S LoCastro; Richard Longabaugh; Barbara J Mason; Margaret E Mattson; William R Miller; Helen M Pettinati; Carrie L Randall; Robert Swift; Roger D Weiss; Lauren D Williams; Allen Zweben
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index.

Authors:  A T McLellan; H Kushner; D Metzger; R Peters; I Smith; G Grissom; H Pettinati; M Argeriou
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  1992

Review 9.  Quality of life as an outcome variable in alcoholism treatment research.

Authors:  R Longabaugh; M E Mattson; G J Connors; N L Cooney
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl       Date:  1994-12

10.  Alcohol-attributable deaths and years of potential life lost--11 States, 2006-2010.

Authors:  Katherine Gonzales; Jim Roeber; Dafna Kanny; Annie Tran; Cathy Saiki; Hal Johnson; Kristin Yeoman; Tom Safranek; Kathleen Creppage; Alicia Lepp; Tracy Miller; Nato Tarkhashvili; Kristine E Lynch; Joanna R Watson; Danielle Henderson; Megan Christenson; Sarah Dee Geiger
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  1 in total

1.  An application of moderated nonlinear factor analysis to develop a commensurate measure of alcohol problems across four alcohol treatment studies.

Authors:  Dylan K Richards; Matthew R Pearson; Kevin A Hallgren; Nick Heather; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.492

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.