| Literature DB >> 33009667 |
Tracey R Turner1, Carly Olafson1, Olga Mykhailova1, April Xu1, Jason P Acker1.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33009667 PMCID: PMC7675687 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transfusion ISSN: 0041-1132 Impact factor: 3.337
Influence of extended hypothermic storage on the quality of SAGM red cell concentrates
| Parameter | RCC production method | Length of hypothermic storage post collection (d) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 | 49 | ||
| Hematocrit (%) |
| 60 ± 2 pass | 61 ± 2 pass |
|
| 62 ± 2 pass | 63 ± 2 pass | |
| Hgb (g/unit) |
| 53.1 ± 5.3 pass | 52.9 ± 5.1 pass |
|
| 59.5 ± 5.2 pass | 59.0 ± 5.4 pass | |
| MCV (fL) |
| 95.3 ± 4.1 | 96.0 ± 4.1 |
|
| 93.5 ± 5.6 | 94.1 ± 5.5 | |
| EIMAX (elongation index) |
| 0.612 ± 0.014 | 0.604 ± 0.010 |
|
| 0.604 ± 0.010 | 0.599 ± 0.009 | |
| KEI (membrane rigidity) |
| 1.226 ± 0.197 | 1.611 ± 0.634 |
|
| 1.114 ± 0.202 | 1.119 ± 0.190 | |
Note: Data shown as mean ± 1 SD. Hgb = hemoglobin; RCC = red cell concentrate; RCF = red cell filtration; WBF = whole blood filtration.
P < 0.05.
FIGURE 1Results for RBC hemolysis (A) using a modified Drabkinʼs method and extracellular potassium (B) measured on a clinical chemistry analyzer. Statistical differences between the RCF method (●, n = 66) and the WBF method (□, n = 14) on the same storage day are indicated by (*) P < 0.05. Statistical differences for comparisons within RCC method type for all post expiry storage days compared to day 42 (expiry) are indicated for RCF RCCs by (†) P < 0.05, (††) P < .01, (†††) P < 0.001; and WBF RCCs by (‡) P < 0.05 and (‡‡) P < 0.01). The dotted line on a indicates the CSA standard for maximum hemolysis of <0.8% required in 95% of units tested