Literature DB >> 33009665

No "Wearing-Off Effect" Seen in Quarterly or Monthly Dosing of Fremanezumab: Subanalysis of a Randomized Long-Term Study.

Andrew M Blumenfeld1, Darko M Stevanovic2, Mario Ortega2, Joshua M Cohen2, Michael J Seminerio2, Ronghua Yang2, Bo Jiang2, Stewart J Tepper3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether quarterly or monthly administration of fremanezumab for migraine prevention exhibits a pattern of decreased efficacy toward the end of the dosing interval (wearing-off effect).
BACKGROUND: The main goals of migraine preventive treatment are to reduce the frequency, severity, and duration of migraine attacks, and migraine-associated disability. Wearing-off refers to the phenomenon whereby clinical symptoms return or worsen before the next dose of a drug is due and has been reported previously with migraine preventive medications. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a long-term, 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 study (NCT02638103) that included chronic (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) patients who rolled over from the 12-week phase 3 HALO CM (NCT02621931) and EM trials (NCT02629861), as well as an additional subset of 312 new patients. Patients with CM or EM received fremanezumab either monthly or quarterly. In this post hoc analysis, for selected months, the difference in the average number of migraine days between weeks 1-2 and weeks 3-4, between weeks 1-3 and week 4, and between weeks 1-2 and weeks 11-12 were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 1890 patients (CM, 1110; EM, 780) were enrolled. At months 3, 6, 9, and 15, there were no substantial differences in mean weekly migraine days between weeks 1-2 and weeks 3-4 or between weeks 1-3 and week 4 with quarterly or monthly fremanezumab in the CM or EM subgroups. There were no substantial increases in mean weekly migraine days between weeks 1-2 and weeks 11-12 during the first quarter of treatment (months 1-3) or the second quarter of treatment (months 4-6) with quarterly or monthly fremanezumab in the CM or EM subgroups. Across both dosing subgroups in CM and EM patients, the mean weekly number of migraine days decreased substantially (30%-42%) during the first 2 weeks; decreases in weekly migraine days remained steady during the last 2 weeks of the first quarter, with a similar maintenance of response during the second quarter.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of data from a long-term, phase 3 study showed that patients receiving quarterly fremanezumab or monthly fremanezumab did not experience a wearing-off effect toward the end of the dosing interval.
© 2020 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist; migraine; preventive; wearing-off

Year:  2020        PMID: 33009665      PMCID: PMC7756709          DOI: 10.1111/head.13994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  26 in total

1.  Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial.

Authors:  Michel D Ferrari; Hans Christoph Diener; Xiaoping Ning; Maja Galic; Joshua M Cohen; Ronghua Yang; Matthias Mueller; Andrew H Ahn; Yael Carmeli Schwartz; Melissa Grozinski-Wolff; Lindsay Janka; Messoud Ashina
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; David W Dodick; Alan M Rapoport; Stephen D Silberstein; Yuju Ma; Ronghua Yang; Pippa S Loupe; Rami Burstein; Lawrence C Newman; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  OnabotulinumtoxinA wear-off in chronic migraine, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Awss Zidan; Cheryl Roe; Devin Burke; Luis Mejico
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Wearing Off Response to OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine: Analysis in a Series of 193 Patients.

Authors:  Sonia Quintas; David García-Azorín; Patricia Heredia; Blanca Talavera; Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga; Ángel L Guerrero
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy.

Authors:  R B Lipton; M E Bigal; M Diamond; F Freitag; M L Reed; W F Stewart
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Wearing Off Effect of OnabotulinumtoxinA Near the End of Treatment Cycle for Chronic Migraine: A 4-Year Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Fawad A Khan; Alaa E Mohammed; Mugilan Poongkunran; Anilkumar Chimakurthy; Michael Pepper
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 7.  History and Review of anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Therapies: From Translational Research to Treatment.

Authors:  Stewart J Tepper
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 8.  Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and migraine current understanding and state of development.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; Sarah Walter; Alan M Rapoport
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.887

9.  OnabotulinumtoxinA Wear-off Phenomenon in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine.

Authors:  Alina Masters-Israilov; Matthew S Robbins
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 5.887

10.  Efficacy and safety of calcitonin-gene-related peptide binding monoclonal antibodies for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Deng; Gai-Gai Li; Hao Nie; Yang-Yang Feng; Guang-Yu Guo; Wen-Liang Guo; Zhou-Ping Tang
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.474

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  CGRP Targeting Therapy for Chronic Migraine-Evidence from Clinical Trials and Real-world Studies.

Authors:  Yen-Feng Wang; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-05-14

2.  Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in patients with migraine and inadequate response to prior preventive treatment: subgroup analyses by country of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Egilius L H Spierings; Mikko Kärppä; Xiaoping Ning; Joshua M Cohen; Verena Ramirez Campos; Ronghua Yang; Uwe Reuter
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 7.277

3.  Does "wearing off" of efficacy occur in galcanezumab-treated patients at the end of the monthly treatment cycle? Post hoc analyses of four phase III randomized trials.

Authors:  Jessica Ailani; Dulanji K Kuruppu; Mallikarjuna Rettiganti; Tina Oakes; Krista Schroeder; Linda Wietecha; Martha Port; Andrew M Blumenfeld
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.311

Review 4.  Reducing the Burden of Migraine: Safety and Efficacy of CGRP Pathway-Targeted Preventive Treatments.

Authors:  George R Nissan; Richard Kim; Joshua M Cohen; Michael J Seminerio; Lynda J Krasenbaum; Karen Carr; Vincent Martin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.