BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plant genomes contain many retrotransposons and their derivatives, which are subject to rapid sequence turnover. As non-autonomous retrotransposons do not encode any proteins, they experience reduced selective constraints leading to their diversification into multiple families, usually limited to a few closely related species. In contrast, the non-coding Cassandra terminal repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIMs) are widespread in many plants. Their hallmark is a conserved 5S rDNA-derived promoter in their long terminal repeats (LTRs). As sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) has a well-described LTR retrotransposon landscape, we aim to characterize TRIMs in beet and related genomes. METHODS: We identified Cassandra retrotransposons in the sugar beet reference genome and characterized their structural relationships. Genomic organization, chromosomal localization, and distribution of Cassandra-TRIMs across the Amaranthaceae were verified by Southern and fluorescent in situ hybridization. KEY RESULTS: All 638 Cassandra sequences in the sugar beet genome contain conserved LTRs and thus constitute a single family. Nevertheless, variable internal regions required a subdivision into two Cassandra subfamilies within B. vulgaris. The related Chenopodium quinoa harbours a third subfamily. These subfamilies vary in their distribution within Amaranthaceae genomes, their insertion times and the degree of silencing by small RNAs. Cassandra retrotransposons gave rise to many structural variants, such as solo LTRs or tandemly arranged Cassandra retrotransposons. These Cassandra derivatives point to an interplay of template switch and recombination processes - mechanisms that likely caused Cassandra's subfamily formation and diversification. CONCLUSIONS: We traced the evolution of Cassandra in the Amaranthaceae and detected a considerable variability within the short internal regions, whereas the LTRs are strongly conserved in sequence and length. Presumably these hallmarks make Cassandra a prime target for unequal recombination, resulting in the observed structural diversity, an example of the impact of LTR-mediated evolutionary mechanisms on the host genome.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plant genomes contain many retrotransposons and their derivatives, which are subject to rapid sequence turnover. As non-autonomous retrotransposons do not encode any proteins, they experience reduced selective constraints leading to their diversification into multiple families, usually limited to a few closely related species. In contrast, the non-coding Cassandra terminal repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIMs) are widespread in many plants. Their hallmark is a conserved 5S rDNA-derived promoter in their long terminal repeats (LTRs). As sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) has a well-described LTR retrotransposon landscape, we aim to characterize TRIMs in beet and related genomes. METHODS: We identified Cassandra retrotransposons in the sugar beet reference genome and characterized their structural relationships. Genomic organization, chromosomal localization, and distribution of Cassandra-TRIMs across the Amaranthaceae were verified by Southern and fluorescent in situ hybridization. KEY RESULTS: All 638 Cassandra sequences in the sugar beet genome contain conserved LTRs and thus constitute a single family. Nevertheless, variable internal regions required a subdivision into two Cassandra subfamilies within B. vulgaris. The related Chenopodium quinoa harbours a third subfamily. These subfamilies vary in their distribution within Amaranthaceae genomes, their insertion times and the degree of silencing by small RNAs. Cassandra retrotransposons gave rise to many structural variants, such as solo LTRs or tandemly arranged Cassandra retrotransposons. These Cassandra derivatives point to an interplay of template switch and recombination processes - mechanisms that likely caused Cassandra's subfamily formation and diversification. CONCLUSIONS: We traced the evolution of Cassandra in the Amaranthaceae and detected a considerable variability within the short internal regions, whereas the LTRs are strongly conserved in sequence and length. Presumably these hallmarks make Cassandra a prime target for unequal recombination, resulting in the observed structural diversity, an example of the impact of LTR-mediated evolutionary mechanisms on the host genome.
Authors: Beatrice Weber; Tony Heitkam; Daniela Holtgräwe; Bernd Weisshaar; André E Minoche; Juliane C Dohm; Heinz Himmelbauer; Thomas Schmidt Journal: Mob DNA Date: 2013-03-01
Authors: Tony Heitkam; Luise Schulte; Beatrice Weber; Susan Liedtke; Sarah Breitenbach; Anja Kögler; Kristin Morgenstern; Marie Brückner; Ute Tröber; Heino Wolf; Doris Krabel; Thomas Schmidt Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 4.599