Literature DB >> 3300920

The resemblance of clinical attributes between mastitic cows with no growth on bacterial milk cultures and those with gram-positive bacteria cultured.

M E White, M E Montgomery.   

Abstract

The clinical attributes of 40 dairy cows which had mastitis but no growth of bacteria from the milk were analyzed and compared to the attributes in 102 cows with only gram-positive and 61 cows with only gram-negative bacteria cultured from the milk. Cows with no bacteria cultured from the milk did not differ significantly from cows with gram-positive bacteria cultured, but 9 of 12 attributes were significantly different between cows with no bacteria cultured and cows with gram-negative bacteria cultured. Discriminant analysis was used to classify cows as members of the gram-positive or gram-negative culture groups. The discriminant equation was then applied to the cows with no bacteria cultured, and 78% of cows with no bacteria cultured were classified as members of the gram-positive group. Most mastitis in cows with no bacteria grown from the milk was probably due to gram-positive bacteria. If antibiotic therapy is used in cows with persistent mastitis and a negative culture in the belief that the culture is a false negative, treatment with antibiotics effective only against gram-negative organisms would not be appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3300920      PMCID: PMC1255299     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  12 in total

1.  The elimination of serum-resistant Escherichia coli from experimentally infected single mammary glands of healthy cows.

Authors:  A W Hill; A L Shears; K G Hibbitt
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.534

2.  Incidence of clinical mastitis in a cohort of British dairy herds.

Authors:  J W Wilesmith; P G Francis; C D Wilson
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1986-02-22       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Factors associated with the occurrence, cause and outcome of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle.

Authors:  J K Pearson; D P Mackie
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1979-11-17       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  The effect of not treating mild cases of clinical mastitis in a dairy herd.

Authors:  R J Chamings
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1984-11-10       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators.

Authors:  J A Hanley; A Lippman-Hand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Environmental mastitis: cause, prevalence, prevention.

Authors:  K L Smith; D A Todhunter; P S Schoenberger
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Isolation of mastitis pathogens from quarters of cows recently treated with antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  E S Stem; F D Barnes; S Olmsted; M E White
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1984-01-15       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  Analysis of the clinical findings used to diagnose coliform mastitis in dairy cows, and comparison to a prediction model.

Authors:  M E White; L T Glickman; M E Montgomery; F D Barnes-Pallesen; E S Stem; P Dinsmore; M S Powers; P Powers; M C Smith; D Jasko
Journal:  Cornell Vet       Date:  1987-01

9.  A survey of clinical mastitis in South-East Queensland dairy herds.

Authors:  R C Daniel; D O'Boyle; M S Marek; A J Frost
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.281

10.  Discriminant analysis of the clinical indicants for bovine coliform mastitis.

Authors:  M E White; L T Glickman; F D Barnes-Pallesen; E G Pearson; M E Montgomery; D Armstrong; R P Wickenden; G Hickey
Journal:  Cornell Vet       Date:  1986-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.