Literature DB >> 33008649

Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.

Alexandre Helbert1, Emmanuel Gaud1, Tim Segers2, Catherine Botteron3, Peter Frinking3, Victor Jeannot4.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the field of monodisperse microbubble synthesis by flow focusing allow for the production of foam-free, highly concentrated and monodisperse lipid-coated microbubble suspensions. It has been found that in vitro, such monodisperse ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) improve the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. Here, we present the first in vivo study in the left ventricle of rat and pig with this new monodisperse bubble agent. We systematically characterize the acoustic sensitivity and safety of the agent at an imaging frequency of 2.5 MHz as compared with three commercial polydisperse UCAs (SonoVue/Lumason, Definity/Luminity and Optison) and one research-grade polydisperse agent with the same shell composition as the monodisperse bubbles. The monodisperse microbubbles, which had a diameter of 4.2 μm, crossed the pulmonary vasculature, and their echo signal could be measured at least as long as that of the polydisperse UCAs, indicating that microfluidically formed monodisperse microbubbles are stable in vivo. Furthermore, it was found that the sensitivity of the monodisperse agent, expressed as the mean echo power per injected bubble, was at least 10 times higher than that of the polydisperse UCAs. Finally, the safety profile of the monodisperse microbubble suspension was evaluated by injecting 400 and 2000 times the imaging dose, and neither physiologic nor pathologic changes were found, which is a first indication that monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles formed by flow focusing are safe for in vivo use. The more uniform acoustic response and corresponding increased imaging sensitivity of the monodisperse agent may boost emerging applications of microbubbles and ultrasound such as molecular imaging and therapy.
Copyright © 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Definity; Flow focusing; Lumason; Luminity; Monodisperse microbubbles; Optison; Sensitivity; SonoVue; Ultrasound contrast agents

Year:  2020        PMID: 33008649     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  3 in total

1.  Bursting Microbubbles: How Nanobubble Contrast Agents Can Enable the Future of Medical Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Agata A Exner; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 8.209

2.  A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes on Clinical and Preclinical Ultrasound Scanners.

Authors:  Carmel M Moran; Charles Arthur; Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-09-15

3.  Toward Precisely Controllable Acoustic Response of Shell-Stabilized Nanobubbles: High Yield and Narrow Dispersity.

Authors:  Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Al C de Leon; Richard Lee; Michaela Cooley; Eric C Abenojar; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 15.881

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.