| Literature DB >> 33007836 |
Mahadir Ahmad1, Nur Syafiqa Balqis Md Din1, Ruthra Devi Tharumalay1, Normah Che Din1, Norhayati Ibrahim1, Noh Amit1, Nor Mf Farah2, Rose Azzlinda Osman3, Mohamed Faisal Abdul Hamid3, Ibnor Azli Ibrahim4, Ezad Azraai Jamsari5, Mohd Rizal Palil6, Sha'ari Ahmad1.
Abstract
Background: The effect of circadian disruption on the bio-psychological clock system has been widely studied. However, the mechanism and the association of circadian rhythm disruption with mental health and physiological responses are still unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of circadian rhythm disruption on mental health and physiological responses among shift workers and the general population.Entities:
Keywords: circadian rhythm; cortisol; glucose; mood; processing speed; psychological wellbeing; triglycerides; working memory
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33007836 PMCID: PMC7579294 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Participants’ characteristics.
| Demography | General Population ( | Shift Worker ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency (Percentage) | Mean ± SD | Frequency (Percentage) | Mean ± SD | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 5 (22.7%) | 5(25%) | ||
| Female | 17(77.3%) | 15 (75%) | ||
|
| ||||
| Single | 9(41%) | 7(35%) | ||
| Married | 13(59%) | 13(65%) | ||
|
| ||||
| 20 to 29 | 7(31.8%) | 8(40%) | ||
| 30 to 39 | 11(50%) | 32.82 ± 5.85 | 3(15%) | 34.40 ± 7.10 |
| 40 to 49 | 4(18.2%) | 9(45%) | ||
|
| ||||
| 18.0 to 21.9 | 9(41%) | 8(40%) | ||
| 22.0 to 25.9 | 11(50%) | 22.75 ± 2.34 | 9(45%) | 22.99 ± 2.82 |
| 26.0 to 29.9 | 2(9%) | 3(15%) | ||
|
| ||||
| 1 to 5 years | 8(36.4%) | 8(40%) | ||
| 6 to 10 years | 6(27.3%) | 6(30%) | ||
| 11 to 15 years | 3(13.6%) | 9.45 ± 6.05 | 3(15%) | 8.30 ± 5.43 |
| 16 to 20 years | 4(18.2%) | 3(15%) | ||
| 21 to 25 years | 1(4.5%) | 0 | ||
Figure 1The Study’s Flow Chart.
Profiles of mental health and cognitive performance (n = 42).
| Parameter | General Population | Shift Worker | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| Mood | 88.91 ± 17.87 | 92.59 ± 12.69 | 83.45 ± 21.56 | 93.20 ± 23.30 |
| Psychological wellbeing | 1.05 ± 1.68 | 1.55 ± 2.24 | 2.05 ± 2.54 | 1.60 ± 2.14 |
| Working memory | 94.09 ± 97.50 | 97.50 ± 15.36 | 89.10 ± 11.90 | 91.75 ± 12.75 |
| Processing speed | 101.68 ± 9.46 | 106.85 ± 13.29 | 106.70 ± 11.99 | 111.95 ± 15.98 |
Participants’ blood variables.
| Parameter | General Population | Shift Worker | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| Cortisol | 240.85 ± 64.24 | 261.54 ± 81.73 | 311.33 ± 108.66 | 231.25 ± 135.17 |
| Triglycerides | 0.98 ± 0.67 | 1.03 ± 0.60 | 1.11 ± 0.54 | 1.02 ± 0.70 |
| Glucose | 5.02 ± 0.42 | 4.96 ± 0.43 | 4.74 ± 0.68 | 4.71 ± 0.55 |
Note: All blood variables were measured in nmol/L (SI units).
Profile of sleep quality among the general population group (n = 22).
| Sleep Quality Profile | Pre-Test % ( | Post-Test % ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep quality | Good sleep | 90.1% (20) | 40.9% (9) |
| Poor sleep | 9.9% (2) | 59.1% (13) | |
The relationship between circadian rhythm disruption and mood, psychological wellbeing, working memory, processing speed, glucose, triglycerides, and cortisol.
| Research Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Circadian rhythm disruption | ||||||||
| 2 | Mood | 0.305 * | |||||||
| 3 | Psychological wellbeing | 0.028 | −0.042 | ||||||
| 4 | Working Memory | −0.114 | −0.178 | 0.026 | |||||
| 5 | Processing Speed | −0.167 | −0.005 | 0.026 | 0.034 | ||||
| 6 | Glucose | 0.091 | −0.183 | −0.238 | 0.049 | −0.219 * | |||
| 7 | Triglycerides | −0.046 | −0.098 | −0.162 | 0.118 | −0.088 | 0.212 | ||
| 8 | Cortisol | 0.074 | 0.263 * | −0.183 | −0.078 | 0.097 | 0.089 | −0.116 | |
* p < 0.05 significant value.
Summary of the result of mixed-design ANOVA.
| Parameter | General Population | Shift Worker | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (Pre) | Mean ± SD (Post) | Mean ± SD (Pre) | Mean ± SD (Post) | (Within) | (Between) | |
| Mood | 88.91 ± 17.87 | 92.59 ± 12.69 | 83.45 ± 21.56 | 93.20 ± 23.30 | 0.005 ** | 0.659 |
| Psychological wellbeing | 1.05 ± 1.68 | 1.55 ± 2.24 | 2.05 ± 2.54 | 1.60 ± 2.14 | 0.942 | 0.363 |
| Working memory | 94.09 ± 11.01 | 97.50 ± 15.36 | 89.10 ± 11.90 | 91.75 ± 12.75 | 0.032 * | 0.159 |
| Processing speed | 101.68 ± 9.46 | 106.85 ± 13.29 | 106.70 ± 11.99 | 111.95 ± 15.98 | 0.004 ** | 0.165 |
| Cortisol | 240.85 ± 64.24 | 261.54 ± 81.73 | 311.33 ± 108.66 | 231.25 ± 135.17 | 0.182 | 0.557 |
| Triglycerides | 0.98 ± 0.67 | 1.03 ± 0.60 | 1.11 ± 0.54 | 1.02 ± 0.70 | 0.852 | 0.729 |
| Glucose | 5.02 ± 0.42 | 4.96 ± 0.43 | 4.74 ± 0.68 | 4.71 ± 0.55 | 0.592 | 0.069 |
* p < 0.05 significant value; ** p < 0.01 significant value
Figure 2Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on the mood states.
Figure 3Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on psychological wellbeing.
Figure 4Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on processing speed.
Figure 5Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on the working memory.
Figure 6Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on cortisol.
Figure 7Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on triglycerides.
Figure 8Mixed-design ANOVA analysis of circadian rhythm disruption on glucose.