Literature DB >> 33007246

Animal-Borne Metrics Enable Acoustic Detection of Blue Whale Migration.

William K Oestreich1, James A Fahlbusch2, David E Cade3, John Calambokidis4, Tetyana Margolina5, John Joseph5, Ari S Friedlaender6, Megan F McKenna7, Alison K Stimpert8, Brandon L Southall6, Jeremy A Goldbogen7, John P Ryan9.   

Abstract

Linking individual and population scales is fundamental to many concepts in ecology [1], including migration [2, 3]. This behavior is a critical [4] yet increasingly threatened [5] part of the life history of diverse organisms. Research on migratory behavior is constrained by observational scale [2], limiting ecological understanding and precise management of migratory populations in expansive, inaccessible marine ecosystems [6]. This knowledge gap is magnified for dispersed oceanic predators such as endangered blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus). As capital breeders, blue whales migrate vast distances annually between foraging and breeding grounds, and their population fitness depends on synchrony of migration with phenology of prey populations [7, 8]. Despite previous studies of individual-level blue whale vocal behavior via bio-logging [9, 10] and population-level acoustic presence via passive acoustic monitoring [11], detection of the life history transition from foraging to migration remains challenging. Here, we integrate direct high-resolution measures of individual behavior and continuous broad-scale acoustic monitoring of regional song production (Figure 1A) to identify an acoustic signature of the transition from foraging to migration in the Northeast Pacific population. We find that foraging blue whales sing primarily at night, whereas migratory whales sing primarily during the day. The ability to acoustically detect population-level transitions in behavior provides a tool to more comprehensively study the life history, fitness, and plasticity of population behavior in a dispersed, capital breeding population. Real-time detection of this behavioral signal can also inform dynamic management efforts [12] to mitigate anthropogenic threats to this endangered population [13, 14]).
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balaenoptera musculus; California Current; Monterey Bay; PAM; bio-logging; bioacoustics; blue whale; foraging; migration; passive acoustic monitoring

Year:  2020        PMID: 33007246     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  4 in total

1.  Shaken, not stirred: blue whales show no acoustic response to earthquake events.

Authors:  Dawn R Barlow; Mateo Estrada Jorge; Holger Klinck; Leigh G Torres
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Acoustic vector sensor analysis of the Monterey Bay region soundscape and the impact of COVID-19.

Authors:  Kevin B Smith; Paul Leary; Thomas Deal; John Joseph; John Ryan; Chris Miller; Craig Dawe; Benjamin Cray
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Quantifying song behavior in a free-living, light-weight, mobile bird using accelerometers.

Authors:  Elena Eisenring; Marcel Eens; Jean-Nicolas Pradervand; Alain Jacot; Jan Baert; Eddy Ulenaers; Michiel Lathouwers; Ruben Evens
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Blue whales increase feeding rates at fine-scale ocean features.

Authors:  James A Fahlbusch; Max F Czapanskiy; John Calambokidis; David E Cade; Briana Abrahms; Elliott L Hazen; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.530

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.