Literature DB >> 33007075

Comparison of outcomes of HCT in blast phase of BCR-ABL1- MPN with de novo AML and with AML following MDS.

Vikas Gupta1, Soyoung Kim2,3, Zhen-Huan Hu2, Ying Liu4, Mahmoud Aljurf5, Ulrike Bacher6, Amer Beitinjaneh7, Jean-Yves Cahn8, Jan Cerny9, Edward Copelan10, Shahinaz M Gadalla11, Robert Peter Gale12, Siddhartha Ganguly13, Biju George14, Aaron T Gerds15, Usama Gergis16, Betty K Hamilton17, Shahrukh Hashmi18,19, Gerhard C Hildebrandt20, Rammurti T Kamble21, Tamila Kindwall-Keller22, Hillard M Lazarus23, Jane L Liesveld24, Mark Litzow25, Richard T Maziarz26, Taiga Nishihori27, Richard F Olsson28,29, David Rizzieri30, Bipin N Savani31, Sachiko Seo32, Melhem Solh33, Jeff Szer34, Leo F Verdonck35, Baldeep Wirk36, Ann Woolfrey37, Jean A Yared38, Edwin P Alyea39, Uday R Popat40, Ronald M Sobecks41, Bart L Scott37, Ryotaro Nakamura42, Wael Saber2.   

Abstract

Comparative outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for BCR-ABL1- myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in blast phase (MPN-BP) vs de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and AML with prior myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs; post-MDS AML), are unknown. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we compared HCT outcomes in 177 MPN-BP patients with 4749 patients with de novo AML, and 1104 patients with post-MDS AML, using multivariate regression analysis in 2 separate comparisons. In a multivariate Cox model, no difference in overall survival (OS) or relapse was observed in patients with MPN-BP vs de novo AML with active leukemia at HCT. Patients with MPN-BP in remission had inferior OS in comparison with de novo AML in remission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.76]) due to higher relapse rate (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.69-2.80]). MPN-BP patients had inferior OS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.00-1.43]) and increased relapse (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.31-1.96]) compared with post-MDS AML. Poor-risk cytogenetics were associated with increased relapse in both comparisons. Peripheral blood grafts were associated with decreased relapse in MPN-BP and post-MDS AML (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar between MPN-BP vs de novo AML, and MPN-BP vs post-MDS AML. Total-body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning was associated with higher NRM in both comparisons. Survival of MPN-BP after HCT is inferior to de novo AML in remission and post-MDS AML due to increased relapse. Relapse-prevention strategies are required to optimize HCT outcomes in MPN-BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33007075      PMCID: PMC7556156          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  19 in total

1.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis with leukemic transformation: a study from the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Subcommittee of the CMWP of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Haefaa Alchalby; Tatjana Zabelina; Thomas Stübig; Anja van Biezen; Martin Bornhäuser; Paolo Di Bartolomeo; Dietrich Beelen; Jean Yves Cahn; Peter Dreger; William Schroyens; Theo de Witte; Eduardo Olavarria; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Allo-SCT for  Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase: a study from the Societe Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

Authors:  X Cahu; P Chevallier; A Clavert; F Suarez; M Michallet; L Vincent; S Vigouroux; D Blaise; C Mariette; K Bilger; M Robin; I Yakoub-Agha; R Peffault de Latour; M Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Healthcare resource utilization in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based study from Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aniket Bankar; Haoyu Zhao; Javaid Iqbal; Ruth Coxford; Matthew C Cheung; Lee Mozessohn; Craig C Earle; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-04-23

4.  Targeted next-generation sequencing in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Terra L Lasho; Mythri Mudireddy; Christy M Finke; Curtis A Hanson; Rhett P Ketterling; Natasha Szuber; Kebede H Begna; Mrinal M Patnaik; Naseema Gangat; Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-02-27

5.  Transplant Outcomes for Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation Study.

Authors:  Salyka Sengsayadeth; Myriam Labopin; Ariane Boumendil; Jürgen Finke; Arnold Ganser; Matthias Stelljes; Gerhard Ehninger; Dietrich Beelen; Dietger Niederwieser; Didier Blaise; Peter Dreger; Ghulam Mufti; Patrice Chevallier; Audrey Mailhol; Katie S Gatwood; Norbert Gorin; Jordi Esteve; Fabio Ciceri; Frederic Baron; Christoph Schmid; Sebastian Giebel; Mohamad Mohty; Bipin N Savani; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Genomic and functional analysis of leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Raajit Rampal; Jihae Ahn; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Michelle Nahas; Kai Wang; Doron Lipson; Geoff A Otto; Roman Yelensky; Todd Hricik; Anna Sophia McKenney; Gabriela Chiosis; Young Rock Chung; Suveg Pandey; Marcel R M van den Brink; Scott A Armstrong; Ahmet Dogan; Andrew Intlekofer; Taghi Manshouri; Christopher Y Park; Srdan Verstovsek; Franck Rapaport; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller; Ross L Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Leukemic transformation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a single-institution experience with 91 cases.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Chin-Yang Li; Rhett P Ketterling; Georgene S Schroeder; Ryan A Knudson; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions.

Authors:  Andrea Bacigalupo; Karen Ballen; Doug Rizzo; Sergio Giralt; Hillard Lazarus; Vincent Ho; Jane Apperley; Shimon Slavin; Marcelo Pasquini; Brenda M Sandmaier; John Barrett; Didier Blaise; Robert Lowski; Mary Horowitz
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Treatment outcomes following leukemic transformation in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  James A Kennedy; Eshetu G Atenafu; Hans A Messner; Kenneth J Craddock; Joseph M Brandwein; Jeffrey H Lipton; Mark D Minden; Aaron D Schimmer; Andre C Schuh; Karen W Yee; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients.

Authors:  H M Shulman; K M Sullivan; P L Weiden; G B McDonald; G E Striker; G E Sale; R Hackman; M S Tsoi; R Storb; E D Thomas
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?

Authors:  James England; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  A SAS macro for estimating direct adjusted survival functions for time-to-event data with or without left truncation.

Authors:  Zhen-Huan Hu; Hai-Lin Wang; Robert Peter Gale; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 5.174

Review 3.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving from Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Many Sides of a Challenging Disease.

Authors:  Francesco Mannelli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  How We Manage Myelofibrosis Candidates for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Nicola Polverelli; Mirko Farina; Mariella D'Adda; Enrico Damiani; Luigi Grazioli; Alessandro Leoni; Michele Malagola; Simona Bernardi; Domenico Russo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.