| Literature DB >> 33006060 |
Hyun Sang Park1,2, Kwang Il Kim3, Jae Young Soh4, Young Ho Hyun4, Bang Eun Lee4, Jong Hwa Lee4, Jung Gwon Jo4, Han Chae Lee4, Hwa Sun Kim5.
Abstract
Worker health centers and health zones provide occupational healthcare services to workers in underserved areas of industrial health. Health zones cannot counsel workers on occupational disease prevention; worker health center personnel have to provide such services through in-person visits. Video teleconsultation can increase the accessibility of high-quality services to workers who visit health zones and improve professional personnel's efficiency. This study aimed to develop a system and an infrastructure that could facilitate video teleconsultation services between worker health centers and health zones, and analyze the services' operation status. A video teleconsultation process based on the role of local and remote institutions was designed. Based on the designed services, a web system supporting teleconsultation and an integrated gateway guaranteeing the interface with medical equipment in the web environment was developed. After analyzing the working environment, an infrastructure consisting of networks, video equipment, medical equipment, and servers necessary for teleconsultation was designed. Statistical results from the developed system and a satisfaction survey conducted by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency were used to analyze the video teleconsultation services' operation status. A system, gateway, and hardware infrastructure within 21 worker health centers and 21 health zones has been operating this service since January 1, 2018. Over two years, the total number of teleconsultation service users was 4979, and the total number of questionnaire respondents was 1270. The total number of service activities was 6388 and total satisfaction was rated as 4.58 (± 0.59) out of 5. In this study, video teleconsultation services were evaluated as being very satisfactory. In particular, service accessibility and local medical personnel service were rated highly, demonstrating that the developed system and infrastructure were well designed according to the goals of the project.Entities:
Keywords: Health zone; Integrated gateway; Underserved area; Video Teleconsultation system; Worker health center
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33006060 PMCID: PMC7529321 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-020-01664-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Syst ISSN: 0148-5598 Impact factor: 4.460
Fig. 1Design of video teleconsultation process between worker health centers and health zones
Fig. 2Conceptual diagram of video teleconsultation process using integrated medical equipment gateway
Fig. 3Design of hardware architecture for video teleconsultation services
Overview of questionnaire
| Category | Number | Item |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 1 | Is it easy to access the health zone? |
| Effectiveness | 2 | Do you think video teleconsultation is better than face-to-face consultation? |
| 3 | Do you feel less reluctant to receive video teleconsultation than to go to a nearby hospital? | |
| 4 | Do you think video teleconsultation with experts in other fields besides occupational environmental medicine is good? | |
| Service level | 5 | Do you think the length of time of video teleconsultation is appropriate? |
| 6 | Is the content of the video teleconsultation helpful? | |
| 7 | Are you satisfied with the content and level of the video teleconsultation service provided by the worker health center staff? | |
| 8 | Are you satisfied with the content and level of the service provided by the health zone staff? | |
| Equipment and environment | 9 | Are you satisfied with the use of facilities and equipment in the health zone? |
| 10 | Are you satisfied with the internal environment of the health zone? | |
| Intention to return | 11 | Do you intend to return to the health zone for continuous video teleconsultation? |
Fig. 4The video teleconsultation setting: (a) a worker and occupational nurse in a health zone’s teleconsultation studio and (b) an occupational environmental medicine professional in the worker health center’s clinic room
Teleconsultation service users’ characteristics (N = 4979)
| Measure | Items | Frequency | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 2225 | 44.7 |
| Female | 2754 | 55.3 | |
| Age (years) | <20 | 18 | 0.4 |
| 20–29 | 492 | 9.9 | |
| 30–39 | 801 | 16.1 | |
| 40–49 | 1117 | 22.4 | |
| 50–59 | 1620 | 32.5 | |
| 60–69 | 785 | 15.8 | |
| ≥70 | 146 | 2.9 | |
| Type of employer | Manufacturing | 1370 | 27.5 |
| Service-based | 2612 | 52.5 | |
| Other | 997 | 20.0 | |
| Type of occupation | Production-based | 853 | 17.1 |
| Clerical | 1368 | 27.5 | |
| Service-based | 2241 | 45.0 | |
| Other | 517 | 10.4 | |
| Number of employees in the workplace | <5 | 1266 | 25.4 |
| 5–9 | 676 | 13.6 | |
| 10–29 | 1168 | 23.5 | |
| 30–49 | 1152 | 23.1 | |
| 50–99 | 290 | 5.8 | |
| ≥100 | 427 | 8.6 |
Fig. 5Proportion of video teleconsultation services in health zones
Fig. 6Number of video teleconsultation activities per month
Respondents’ characteristics (N = 1270)
| Measure | Items | Frequency | (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 814 | 64.1 |
| Female | 456 | 35.9 | |
| Age (years) | <20 | 8 | 0.6 |
| 20–29 | 187 | 14.7 | |
| 30–39 | 243 | 19.1 | |
| 40–49 | 298 | 23.5 | |
| 50–59 | 353 | 27.8 | |
| 60–69 | 163 | 12.8 | |
| ≥70 | 18 | 1.4 | |
| Type of employer | Manufacturing | 335 | 26.4 |
| Service-based | 412 | 32.4 | |
| Other | 523 | 41.2 | |
| Type of occupation | Production-based | 234 | 18.4 |
| Clerical | 431 | 33.9 | |
| Service-based | 455 | 35.8 | |
| Other | 150 | 11.8 | |
| Number of employees in the workplace | <5 | 250 | 19.7 |
| 5–9 | 152 | 12.0 | |
| 10–29 | 304 | 23.9 | |
| 30–49 | 235 | 18.5 | |
| 50–99 | 106 | 8.3 | |
| ≥100 | 223 | 17.6 | |
| Time in the workplace (years) | <1 | 197 | 15.5 |
| 1–4 | 520 | 40.9 | |
| 5–9 | 230 | 18.1 | |
| ≥10 | 323 | 24.4 | |
| Number of visits to an HZ | 1 ~ 2 | 943 | 74.3 |
| 3–5 | 206 | 16.2 | |
| 6–9 | 45 | 3.5 | |
| ≥10 | 76 | 6.0 |
Fig. 7Results of video teleconsultation services satisfaction survey