Maya Eiger-Moscovich1, Ralph C Eagle1, Carol L Shields2, Hilary Racher3, Sara E Lally2, Rona Z Silkiss4, Jerry A Shields2, Tatyana Milman1,5. 1. Department of Ophthalmic Pathology, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Impact Genetics/Dynacare, Bowmanville, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of Ophthalmic Plastic, Reconstructive and Orbital Surgery, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, Anatomy, and Cell Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) is defined clinically as the association of cutaneous sebaceous neoplasm and visceral malignancy. Ancillary tests are considered crucial for diagnosis. Although screening guidelines for MTS, including the Mayo MTS scoring system, have been proposed, there are no ophthalmic site-specific guidelines. SUMMARY: A literature review conducted by PubMed search for articles describing patients with periocular sebaceous neoplasm and MTS disclosed 31 publications describing 60 patients, 36 (60%) of whom fulfilled clinical criteria for MTS, 6 (10%) whose diagnosis was based on screening ancillary studies, 14 (23%) who fulfilled clinical criteria and had supporting screening ancillary studies, and 4 (7%) who fulfilled clinical criteria and had supporting diagnostic genetic testing. Most patients were male (34 vs. 15 females), with a median age of 59 years (range 37-79 years). The most common diagnosis was sebaceous carcinoma (40/60, 67%), followed by sebaceous adenoma (16/60, 27%), followed by other tumors with sebaceous differentiation (4/60, 6%). The periocular lesions were identified prior to visceral malignancy in 10 out of 45 (22%) cases, after visceral malignancy in 34 out of 45 (76%) cases, and concurrently with visceral malignancy in 1 out of 45 (2%) cases. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins was performed in 41 out of 60 (68%) and 14 out of 38 (37%) of the tumors had lost MSH2. Based on Mayo-MTS scores of 2 or greater, and after removing visceral malignancies not included in their scoring algorithm, 26 out of 30 of patients (87%) with complete data were considered to be appropriate candidates for further work-up. A survey of current practice was conducted by questionnaires, distributed to ophthalmic pathologists, ocular oncologists, and oculoplastic surgeons from national and international professional societies. Of the 103 physicians who participated in the survey, 91 (88%) felt that MTS evaluation guidelines were not sufficiently clear. KEY MESSAGES: Our findings suggest that Mayo MTS screening guidelines may be applicable to periocular sebaceous neoplasms. The uncertainty of ophthalmic specialists about optimal screening guidelines for MTS reflects the heterogeneity of defining criteria for MTS and limited molecular genetic data. Larger studies with detailed clinical, histopathologic, and molecular genetic data are required to formally assess screening guidelines for MTS in patients with periocular sebaceous neoplasms.
BACKGROUND: Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) is defined clinically as the association of cutaneous sebaceous neoplasm and visceral malignancy. Ancillary tests are considered crucial for diagnosis. Although screening guidelines for MTS, including the Mayo MTS scoring system, have been proposed, there are no ophthalmic site-specific guidelines. SUMMARY: A literature review conducted by PubMed search for articles describing patients with periocular sebaceous neoplasm and MTS disclosed 31 publications describing 60 patients, 36 (60%) of whom fulfilled clinical criteria for MTS, 6 (10%) whose diagnosis was based on screening ancillary studies, 14 (23%) who fulfilled clinical criteria and had supporting screening ancillary studies, and 4 (7%) who fulfilled clinical criteria and had supporting diagnostic genetic testing. Most patients were male (34 vs. 15 females), with a median age of 59 years (range 37-79 years). The most common diagnosis was sebaceous carcinoma (40/60, 67%), followed by sebaceous adenoma (16/60, 27%), followed by other tumors with sebaceous differentiation (4/60, 6%). The periocular lesions were identified prior to visceral malignancy in 10 out of 45 (22%) cases, after visceral malignancy in 34 out of 45 (76%) cases, and concurrently with visceral malignancy in 1 out of 45 (2%) cases. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins was performed in 41 out of 60 (68%) and 14 out of 38 (37%) of the tumors had lost MSH2. Based on Mayo-MTS scores of 2 or greater, and after removing visceral malignancies not included in their scoring algorithm, 26 out of 30 of patients (87%) with complete data were considered to be appropriate candidates for further work-up. A survey of current practice was conducted by questionnaires, distributed to ophthalmic pathologists, ocular oncologists, and oculoplastic surgeons from national and international professional societies. Of the 103 physicians who participated in the survey, 91 (88%) felt that MTS evaluation guidelines were not sufficiently clear. KEY MESSAGES: Our findings suggest that Mayo MTS screening guidelines may be applicable to periocular sebaceous neoplasms. The uncertainty of ophthalmic specialists about optimal screening guidelines for MTS reflects the heterogeneity of defining criteria for MTS and limited molecular genetic data. Larger studies with detailed clinical, histopathologic, and molecular genetic data are required to formally assess screening guidelines for MTS in patients with periocular sebaceous neoplasms.
Authors: Lisa Jagan; Pablo Zoroquiain; Vasco Bravo-Filho; Patrick Logan; Mohammed Qutub; Miguel N Burnier Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 4.638