Mesut Aydın1, Harun Egemen Tolunay2, Erol Nadi Varlı2, Barış Boza3, Özgür Şahin4, Serhat Özer5, Ahmet Cumhur Dülger1. 1. Van Yuzuncu Yil University, School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Van, Turkey. 2. Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Maternity and Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Mardin State Hospital, Department of Perinatology, Artuklu/Mardin, Turkey. 4. Ufuk University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ankara, Turkey. 5. Private Defne Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Turkey.
Abstract
Objectives: Limited data are available from recent trials involving pregnant women to guide Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis. There are no data about the presence of H. pylori in the amniotic fluid as well. Furthermore, the relation between amniotic fluid H. pylori and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) has not been characterized yet. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study conducted after obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee. Pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis were enrolled in the study. The stool antigen test assessed the presence of H. pylori in amniotic fluid. A perinatologist independently performed an amniocentesis. The obtained amniotic liquid was sent to the laboratory to evaluate H. pylori infection by stool H. pylori antigen assay. We determined the rate of H. pylori in amniotic fluid and assessed relations between H. pylori infection and pregnancy outcome, including HG. Results: Between May and September 2017, we enrolled 48 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis to detect possible fetal malformations. Patients were divided into two groups regarding the HG status. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of H. pylori infection presence. Among them, 28 (58.3%) were found to have a positive H. pylori test in their amniotic fluid. The rate of HG was significantly higher (71.4%) in patients who tested positive for H. pylori in amniocentesis than the H. pylori-negative group (20%), (p<0.001). Conclusions: The study's main new finding is that presence of H. pylori in the amniotic fluid is possible. Our data suggest that H. pylori-infected amniotic fluid is associated with the experience of past HG. The current study may have important implications for HG detection and help identify patients who would benefit from future preventive strategies.
Objectives: Limited data are available from recent trials involving pregnant women to guide Helicobacter pyloriinfection diagnosis. There are no data about the presence of H. pylori in the amniotic fluid as well. Furthermore, the relation between amniotic fluid H. pylori and hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) has not been characterized yet. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study conducted after obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee. Pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis were enrolled in the study. The stool antigen test assessed the presence of H. pylori in amniotic fluid. A perinatologist independently performed an amniocentesis. The obtained amniotic liquid was sent to the laboratory to evaluate H. pylori infection by stool H. pylori antigen assay. We determined the rate of H. pylori in amniotic fluid and assessed relations between H. pylori infection and pregnancy outcome, including HG. Results: Between May and September 2017, we enrolled 48 pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis to detect possible fetal malformations. Patients were divided into two groups regarding the HG status. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of H. pylori infection presence. Among them, 28 (58.3%) were found to have a positive H. pylori test in their amniotic fluid. The rate of HG was significantly higher (71.4%) in patients who tested positive for H. pylori in amniocentesis than the H. pylori-negative group (20%), (p<0.001). Conclusions: The study's main new finding is that presence of H. pylori in the amniotic fluid is possible. Our data suggest that H. pylori-infected amniotic fluid is associated with the experience of past HG. The current study may have important implications for HG detection and help identify patients who would benefit from future preventive strategies.
Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped, multiple
unipolar flagellated and urease producing bacteria. Subjects diagnosed with
H. pylori reported more comorbidity burden and higher use of
healthcare services than those without H. pylori [1]. H. pylori affects over one
billion people worldwide. Although patients often remain asymptomatic for years,
chronic H. pylori infection is a leading cause of peptic ulcer,
gastric cancer, gastric lymphoma, and pregnancy-related clinical events, including
hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) and preterm birth (PTB). It has also been shown that
pregnant women with H. pylori infection experience substantially
higher pregnancy-related diseases than those without H. pylori
[2].Many obstetric studies have been conducted on the relationship between maternal
H. pylori infection and HG during pregnancy. The presence of
H. pylori infection was searched in maternal fecal content,
fetal umbilical cord, as well as in maternal serum [3-5]. There have been conflicting
results on the association between maternal H. pylori infection and
HG. A meta-analysis of 25 case-control studies showed that nearly half of them had
not been found an association between HG and H. pylori [2]. On the other hand, the presence of
H. pylori has never been examined in amniotic fluid to
date.As a part of efforts to decline pregnancy-related diseases, including HG, the many
researchers conducted studies involving H. Pylori infection in
pregnant women. Suspected H. pylori infection is best assessed by
histopathological examination of gastric biopsy specimens (Figure 1). But performing endoscopy in pregnant women has
difficulties due to the risk of PTB. Furthermore, these studies are not based on
amniotic fluid that may not reflect H. pylori status among pregnant
women. With the advent of the H. pylori treatment, it remains
unclear whether the amniotic fluid contains H. pylori or not.
Furthermore, the effect of H. pylori in amniotic fluid on
pregnancy-related diseases is also unknown. Therefore, we conducted a current study
to detect the rate of H. pylori infection in amniotic fluid, as
well as the percentage of HG among those with H. pyloriinfection.
Figure 1
Histological imaging for H. pylori.
Material and Methods
This prospective trial was conducted between May and September 2017 at a university
medical center in Turkey, where H. pylori infection was endemic
[6]. Forty-eight pregnant women aged
between 16 and 35 from rural Turkish communities were enrolled for the study.
Patients were divided into two groups regarding their HG status. After that, we
investigated each group for H. pylori infection presence. We
included 24 pregnant women who suffered from HG and 24 pregnant women without HG,
and also both groups of patients who underwent amniocentesis procedure with
appropriate obstetric indications for possible chromosomal anomalies of the fetus
(Figure 2). The main goals of the current
study are to describe H. pylori infection status in amniotic fluid
and the association between amniotic fluid H. pylori infection and
HG. Participants completed a comprehensive baseline examination that included
detailed questionnaires as well as laboratory examinations. On questionnaires, we
detected severe vomiting and nausea; also, in laboratory examinations, we evaluated
ketonuria and electrolyte imbalance. We excluded samples from patients who had prior
treatment with proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics that might confuse H.
pylori status in amniotic fluid. Also, fetuses with oligohydramnios
were excluded from the study.
Figure 2
Sonography imaging from amniocentesis procedure.
Evidence of HG of the study patients was extracted from the hospital database. HG
diagnosis was also established by a perinatologist according to the presence of
protracted vomiting and nausea in pregnancy, accompanied by weight loss, disturbance
of electrolyte balance, ketonuria, and dehydration or hospitalization [7]. Table
1 shows the diagnosis criteria of HG. A perinatologist performed all
amniocentesis procedures according to the guideline of the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) [8]
Amniocentesis is a technique that involves taking a small sample of the amniotic
fluid using a needle, via a transabdominal approach and under continuous ultrasound
guidance, in order to obtain a sample of fetal exfoliated cells, transudates, urine,
or secretions. Various chromosomal, biochemical, molecular, and microbial studies
were performed to date on the amniotic fluid sample [9].
Table 1
Clinical findings of HG.
Severe vomiting and nausea in pregnancy
Distaste to food
Losing 5% or more of weight before pregnancy
Decreased urine output
Dehydration
Ketonuria
Disturbance of electrolyte balance
Loss of skin elasticity
Abbreviation: HG, hyperemesis gravidarum
Amniotic fluid specimens from the baseline examinations were processed within 2 hours
of collection and transported to the microbiology laboratory. Amniotic fluid samples
were tested for H. pylori infection by using a commercial stool
H. pylori antigen test kit (GI Supply® • Camp Hill, PA, USA)
having 95% specificity for detecting H. pylori. Universally, at
least 2cc’s of the amniotic fluid sample were removed and wasted before the analysis
of further examination. We used this wasted amniotic fluid material for examining
H. pylori infection. The study was conducted under the
principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics committee approval was received
for this study (ethics committee no: 92979632, 06/10). All pregnant patients
provided written informed consent.We defined the presence of H. pylori infection when the stool test
was positive in amniotic fluid. Study subjects were also required to be medically
treatment-free for H. pylori infection at least 6 months from the
time of study entry.
Statistical Analysis
Analysis of the data collected in the study was performed using the Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences 21 statistical software package (SPSS 21: IBM
Corporation, Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics for the continuous variables
were presented as mean, standard deviation (SD), and count and percent for the
categorical variables. Comparisons between H. pylori-positive
and negative groups were performed by the Chi-square test. The differences were
considered statistically significant at p<0.05. The required sample size had
been calculated using G*Power 3.1 [10].
Assuming an alpha of .05 and an effect size of w=.50, power analysis suggested
that a total of 43 participants are required to have 90% power; total of 52
participants to have 95% power would be required.
Results
A total of 53 patients undergoing amniocentesis were included in the study. Five
patients were excluded due to insufficient amniotic fluid. Finally, 48 pregnant
women’s amniotic fluids were evaluated. H. pylori infection was
observed in 28 of 48 (58.3%) patients. The rate of HG was significantly higher
(20/28, 71.4%) in patients testing positive for H. pylori in
amniocentesis than H. pylori-negative group (4/20, 20%)
(p<0.001) (Table
2).
Table 2
Frequency of HG between H. pylori positive and negative
group.
HG positive
HG negative
Total
P value
H. pylori positive
20
8
28
<0.001
H. pylori negative
4
16
20
Total
24
24
48
Abbreviation: HG, hyperemesis gravidarum
There was no significant difference between H. Pylori positive and
negative groups regarding baseline characteristics and laboratory parameters (Table 3 and 4).
Table 3
Baseline characteristics of the patients.
H. pylori (+) group (N=28)
Mean±SD
H. pylori (-) group (N=20)
Mean±SD
P value
Age
27.5±6.1
26.9±5.7
P ˃0.05
Gravida
2.4±1.1
2.4±1.2
P ˃0.05
Parity
1±0.9
1.1±1
P ˃0.05
BMI
27.3±5.5
25.8±4.7
P ˃0.05
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation
In the current study, we tried to find out whether H. pylori might
be detected from amniotic fluid by stool antigen test in pregnant women. We also
searched for any association between amniotic H. pylori infection
and HG. To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous study on H.
pylori in amnion fluid, and this is the first report in the
literature.In our study involving 48 pregnant women, 28 (58.3%) had a positive antigen test from
amniotic fluid. When compared to H. pylori-negative pregnant women,
positive counterparts had statistically significant higher rates of HG
(p<0.001).H. pylori is a gram-negative bacterium that induces chronic
inflammation of underlying gastric mucosa [11]. Additionally, recent studies show the relation between serological
evidence of infection with H. pylori and increased systemic
inflammation, as well as extra-gastric diseases [12,13]. H.
pylori infection is acquired early in childhood and – if not treated –
may cause many gastric diseases including peptic ulcer, gastric cancer, and gastric
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [14]. The importance of H. pylori has recently been
increased in the obstetric, gynecology, and reproductive field [15]. The relationship between maternal
H. pylori infection and HG continues to be investigated.
Studies show that H. pylori infection in pregnant women may cause
HG and PTB as well as other pregnancy-related diseases [16-18].Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affect more than half of pregnant women and cause
low life quality and restricted social functions during early pregnancy [19,20].
The situation worsens with an increase in the number and severity of vomiting in
some pregnant patients. This situation is characterized by weight loss, dehydration,
electrolyte disturbance and it is referred to as HG that requires hospitalization
[7]. HG occurs in approximately 0.3-2% of
pregnancies and is the single most frequent reason for hospital admission in the
first half of pregnancy [21] Several studies
have shown that pregnancies with severe nausea and vomiting or HG have demonstrated
adverse effects on birth weight, SGA, and prematurity rates [22,23].Many case-control studies [3,24-28] showed a significant positive
association between HG and H. pylori infection in pregnancy. Also,
in a systematic review of 14 case-control studies, a higher prevalence of HG was
found in H. pylori-infected pregnant women than uninfected ones
(pooled OR = 4.45; 95%CI: 2.31-8.54) [29].
H. pylori serology or stool antigen tests were used to detect
H. pylori in these studies. However, a meta-analysis of 25
case-control studies revealed that of the 25, 14 found an association between HG and
H. pylori while 11 did not [2].In our study, the risk of HG differed significantly in patients who had a positive
result for H. pylori in amniotic fluid. Although it could be argued
that HG might be a result of multifactorial causes and not only due to H.
pylori infection, there have been several studies handling H.
pylori infection-related HG, which yielded that HG was found even in
patients with acute H. pylori infection. Therefore, we concluded
that the presence of H. pylori infection in amniotic fluid might
cause HG in study patients.There are both invasive and non-invasive diagnostic methods which are being used to
determine the H. pylori infection status. Invasive techniques are
endoscopy, culture, rapid urease test, histology, and molecular methods, while
non-invasive methods include urea breath test, stool antigen test, and H.
pylori serology [30]. It has
been shown that stool antigen test has 90.1% sensitivity and 92.4% specificity,
which is comparable to the other invasive or non-invasive tests. It is a cheap,
automated, and minimally labor-intensive method [31]. Since stool antigen tests have been developed for detecting
H. pylori microorganism in feces, there are no published data
to detect H. pylori in pregnant women undergoing
amniocentesis.Despite many obstetric studies on H. pylori-related HG, little is
known about amniotic fluid H. pylori infection. So, we used a stool
antigen test to detect H. pylori infection in amniotic fluid. At
first, our analyses of amniotic fluid from 28 patients showed that H.
pylori infection in a pregnant woman might be detected by a
stool H. pylori antigen test in amniotic fluid. The possible
explanation for the presence of H. pylori in amniotic fluid is a
fetal gastric infection by H. pylori. Another possible reason is
that maternal H. pylori infections are fully penetrant into the
amniotic liquid.The confounding factors underlying H. pylori infection include;
epidemiological incidence variants, genetic or environmental factors, geographical
situations, and the differences in the methods used to detect infection [32].A limitation of this study is the low number of patients included. This could bias
the results since the rate of HG may be affected in the analysis. Also, potential
biases are the possible confounding effects on the amniotic fluid by the normal
bacterial flora that can affect the stool H. pylori antigen test.
Finally, we did not assess the accuracy of the H. pylori stool
antigen test in combination with the ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay)
method.
Conclusion
In our study, we showed that H. pylori infection in amniotic fluid
might be detected by the H. pylori stool antigen test. Our findings
reveal the relationship between the presence of H. pylori in
amniotic fluid and HG. Furthermore, prospective studies should be performed about
the relationship between systemic inflammation and H. pyloriinfection that will shed light on H. pylori infection’s role in
amniotic fluid. Additionally, the effect of CagA positivity and the CagA toxin as
essential virulence factors should be examined to detect the H.
pylori infection [32].
Eradication of this infection seems necessary in the treatment of HG. Besides,
H. pylori positivity in amniotic fluid may indicate fetuses
with H. pylori infection. Therefore, the necessity of screening for
H. pylori in babies of mothers with positive H.
pylori in amniotic fluid may be a new research topic. Further studies
should be performed to understand the role of H. pylori infection
in HG etiology and rule out confounding factors. Our study will contribute to the
literature in terms of showing H. pylori
in utero contamination.
Authors: M Cruz-Lemini; M Parra-Saavedra; V Borobio; M Bennasar; A Goncé; J M Martínez; A Borrell Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 7.299