| Literature DB >> 33004206 |
Jorge H Nuñez1, Juan Antonio Porcel2, Joan Pijoan2, Lledó Batalla2, Jordi Teixidor2, Ernesto Guerra-Farfan2, Joan Minguell2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The severe disruptions caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus have necessitated a redistribution of resources to meet hospitals' current service needs during this pandemic. The aim is to share our experiences and outcomes during the first month of the Covid-19 pandemic, based on the strategies recommended and strategies we have implemented.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Organization; Orthopaedic; Pandemic; Trauma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33004206 PMCID: PMC7518794 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Injury ISSN: 0020-1383 Impact factor: 2.586
Fig. 1Current algorithm for the patients that need hospital admission at trauma emergencies
Description of personal protective equipment (PPE).
| 1. Waterproof gown |
| 2. Mask. The conventional surgical mask does not offer protection if aerosols exist. The type of mask that is required includes the N95 and FFP2/FFP3 masks (which filter 96 and 99% of organisms, respectively). It is preferable to use masks without valves, since masks with valves do not protect patients from our microorganisms. We recommend wearing a surgical mask over a N95 or FFP2/FFP3 mask. |
| 3. Glasses. Because of the power tools, aerosols are produced during procedures, so that complete ocular screen coverage is essential. |
| 4. Full face coverage screen. This does not protect from aerosols, but is necessary when there is a risk of splashing (blood, vomiting or other biological fluids). |
| 5. Sterile gloves (2 pairs) |
| 6. Cap. It is a good idea for all staff with long hair to have it fully tied up in a low bun and properly restrained. |
| 7. Exclusive footwear for the area of activity, without perforations. We recommend long boots for arthroscopy. |
| Once the PPE is in place, surgical scrubbing with an alcohol gel will be performed on the surgical gloves, and sterile equipment necessary for the surgical intervention (gown and sterile gloves) will be placed on the PPE. |
%: Percentage, PPE: Personal protective equipment
Fig. 2Photographs of our personal protective equipment (PPE)
Description of the duties that were performed in the intensive critic units (ICUs).
| - Review ALLERGIES of the patients. If they have allergies, activate the computer alert |
| - Review standard basic treatment: |
| 1. Thromboprophylaxis regimen (enoxaparin 40 mg every 24 hours / SC) |
| 2. Digestive bleeding prophylaxis regimen (Pantoprazole 40mg every 24 hours / EV) |
| - Review possible interactions of the COVID treatment with other treatments prescribed in the patient. If risk of interactions is detected, COMMUNICATE to the doctor responsible for the patient. |
| - Check that all patients have an EKG in the computer system. |
| - Check that medical orders are printed and signed on top of the patient's folder. |
| * Calls to some patients’ relatives |
| Complementary income tests |
| - Analytical tests: Troponin, |
| - EKG |
| Treatment |
| - Hydroxychloroquine 400mg every 12 hours for the first day, followed by 200mg every 12 hours for 5 days |
| - Ceftriaxone 1 gram every 24h (7 days) + Azithromycin 500mg every 24 hours (5 days) - (In case of penicillin allergy: Levofloxacin 750 mg every 24 hours + Azithromycin) |
| * In case of institutionalized patient: Coverage for pseudomonas (piperacillin-tazobactam) + MARSA cleavage. |
| Tocilizumab (under discussion) Will be evaluated individually in those patients with refractory progressive impairment.. |
COVID: coronavirus disease-19, EKG: Electrocardiogram, NT-proBNP: pro b-type natriuretic peptide, IL-6: Interleukin 6, LDH: Lactate dehydrogenase
Comparison of emergency clinical visits with the previous month before implementation of stringent lockdown measures for the population. To establish the relationship between the two different periods, a Chi-squared test analysis were made in the statistical package of IBM SPSS ver.25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA).
| 54.6 (22.5) | 57.5 (22.5) | 55.1 (22.1) | 0.08 | |
| Hospital admission (%) | 212 (10.2) | 90 (17.3) | 302 (11.6) | |
| Flight or abandonment (%) | 54 (2.6) | 3 (0.6) | 57 (2.2) | |
| Voluntary discharge (%) | 5 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (0.1) | |
| Workplace accident (%) | 45 (2.2) | 11 (2.1) | 56 (2.2) | |
| Traffic accident (%) | 84 (4.0) | 19 (3.5) | 103 (3.9) | |
SD: Standard deviation; %: percentage; period 1: From February 12 to March 13, 2020, previous month before the state of Emergency, period 2: From March 14 to April 13, 2020, first month of the Spain State of Emergency.
Descriptions and percentages for the surgeries performed. The absolute frequencies and percentage were used to report the categorical variables. the statistical package of IBM SPSS ver.25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA).
| Polytrauma External Fixation | 3 | 2.9 |
| Osteoporotic Hip Fractures | 46 | 45.3 |
| Femur Shaft Fracture | 2 | 1.9 |
| Distal Femur Fracture | 2 | 1.9 |
| Periprosthetic Hip Fractures | 3 | 2.9 |
| Periprosthetic Knee Fractures | 2 | 1.9 |
| Tibial Plateau Fractures | 3 | 2.9 |
| Tibia Shaft Fractures | 2 | 1.9 |
| Ankle Fractures | 5 | 4.9 |
| Proximal Humerus Fractures | 5 | 4.9 |
| Humerus Shaft Fractures | 1 | 0.9 |
| Distal Radius Fracture | 3 | 2.9 |
| Spine Fractures | 6 | 5.9 |
| Foot Fractures | 2 | 1.9 |
| Musculoskeletal infection | 5 | 4.9 |
| Periprosthetic joint infection | 3 | 2.9 |
| Hand Injuries | 4 | 3.9 |
| Quadriceps Tendon Rupture | 1 | 0.9 |
| Other surgeries | 4 | 3.9 |
%: Percentage