Literature DB >> 33003175

Improvement Initiative to Develop and Implement a Tool for Detecting Drug-Drug Interactions During Oncology Clinical Trial Enrollment Eligibility Screening.

Lauren A Marcath1, Taylor D Coe2, Faisal Shakeel2, Edward Reynolds3, Mike Bayuk3, Steven Haas3, Bruce G Redman4, Siu-Fun Wong5, Daniel L Hertz2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Screening subjects for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) before enrollment in oncology clinical trials is integral to ensuring safety, but standard procedures or tools are not readily available to screen DDI in this setting. Our objectives were to develop a DDI screening tool for use during oncology clinical trial enrollment and to test usability in single-center and multicenter pilot studies.
METHODS: A multistage approach was used for this quality improvement intervention. Semistructured interviews with individuals responsible for DDI screening were conducted to develop a prototype tool. The tool was used for screening DDI in subjects enrolling in National Clinical Trials Network trials of commercially available agents during a single-center 3-month pilot. Improvements were made, and a 3-month multicenter pilot was conducted at volunteer SWOG Cancer Research Network sites. Participants were surveyed to determine tool usability and efficiency.
RESULTS: A tool was developed from semistructured interviews. A critical feature was reporting which medications had specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics including transporter and cytochrome P450 substrates, inhibitors, or inducers and QT prolongation. In the 12-site study, average (SD) DDI screening time for each patient decreased by 15.7 (10.2) minutes (range, 3-35 minutes; P < 0.001). Users reported the tool highly usable, with >90% agreeing with all positive usability characterizations and disagreeing with all negative complexity characterizations.
CONCLUSIONS: A DDI screening tool for oncology clinical trial enrollment was created and its usability confirmed. Further testing with more diverse investigator sites and study drugs during eligibility screening is warranted to improve safety and data accuracy within clinical trials.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33003175      PMCID: PMC7775319          DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.243


  18 in total

1.  Squire 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  ASHP guidelines on preventing medication errors with chemotherapy and biotherapy.

Authors:  Barry Goldspiel; James M Hoffman; Niesha L Griffith; Susan Goodin; Robert DeChristoforo; Capt Michael Montello; Judy L Chase; Sylvia Bartel; Jharana Tina Patel
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.637

3.  Clinical Outcomes Associated with Drug-Drug Interactions of Oral Chemotherapeutic Agents: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Literature Review.

Authors:  Manvi Sharma; Aisha Vadhariya; Soumya Chikermane; Suma Gopinathan; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Sharon H Giordano; Michael L Johnson; Holly M Holmes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Potential cytochrome P-450 drug-drug interactions in adults with metastatic solid tumors and effect on eligibility for Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Kari B Wisinski; Colby A Cantu; Jens Eickhoff; Kurt Osterby; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Jennifer Heideman; Glenn Liu; George Wilding; Susan Johnston; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Role of clinical pharmacists to prevent drug interactions in cancer outpatients: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Carmen Lopez-Martin; Margarita Garrido Siles; Julia Alcaide-Garcia; Vicente Faus Felipe
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-10-19

6.  Potential drug interactions and chemotoxicity in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mihaela A Popa; Kristie J Wallace; Antonella Brunello; Martine Extermann; Lodovico Balducci
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Comparison of Nine Tools for Screening Drug-Drug Interactions of Oral Oncolytics.

Authors:  Lauren A Marcath; Jingyue Xi; Emily K Hoylman; Kelley M Kidwell; Shawna L Kraft; Daniel L Hertz
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in cancer patients treated with oral anticancer drugs.

Authors:  R W F van Leeuwen; D H S Brundel; C Neef; T van Gelder; R H J Mathijssen; D M Burger; F G A Jansman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Observational measure of implementation progress in community based settings: the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC).

Authors:  Patricia Chamberlain; C Hendricks Brown; Lisa Saldana
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  Basket Trials in Oncology: A Trade-Off Between Complexity and Efficiency.

Authors:  Kristen M Cunanan; Mithat Gonen; Ronglai Shen; David M Hyman; Gregory J Riely; Colin B Begg; Alexia Iasonos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews.

Authors:  Richard H Parrish; Heather Monk Bodenstab; Dustin Carneal; Ryan M Cassity; William E Dager; Sara J Hyland; Jenna K Lovely; Alyssa Pollock; Tracy M Sparkes; Siu-Fun Wong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.