Literature DB >> 33002464

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Concurrent Heart Failure.

Shilpkumar Arora1, Rahul Jaswaney2, Chinmay Jani3, Zachary Zuzek2, Samarthkumar Thakkar4, Harsh P Patel5, Mohini Patel6, Nilay Patel7, Byomesh Tripathi8, Sopan Lahewala9, Nirav Arora9, Richard Josephson2, Mohammed Najeeb Osman2, Brian D Hoit2, Guru Kowlgi10, Siva K Mulpuru11, Christopher V DeSimone11, Juan Viles-Gonzalez12, Abhishek Deshmukh11.   

Abstract

Due to limited real-world data, the aim of this study was to explore the impact of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF). This retrospective cohort study identified 119,694 patients with AF and HF from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2017. Propensity-matching was generated using demographics, comorbidities, hospital and other characteristics through multivariate logistic regression. Greedy's propensity score match (1:15) algorithm was used to create matched data. The primary end point was a composite of HF readmission and mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include HF readmission, mortality, AF readmission, and any-cause readmission at 1 year. Of the 119,694 patients, 63,299 had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and 56,395 had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the overall HFrEF cohort, the primary outcome was similar (HR, 95% confidence interval, p-value) (1.01, 0.91 to 1.13, 0.811). AF readmission (0.41, 0.33 to 0.49, <0.001) and any readmission (0.87, 0.82 to 0.93, <0.001) were reduced with CA. In the propensity-matched HFrEF cohort, results were unchanged (primary outcome: 1.10, 0.95 to 1.27, 0.189; AF readmission: 0.46, 0.36 to 0.59, <0.001; any readmission: 0.89, 0.82 to 0.98, 0.015). In the overall HFpEF cohort, the primary outcome was similar (0.90, 0.78 to 1.04, 0.154). AF readmission was reduced with CA (0.54, 0.44 to 0.65, <0.001). In the propensity-matched HFpEF cohort, results were unchanged (primary outcome 1.10, 0.92 to 1.31, 0.289; AF readmission 0.44, 0.33 to 0.57, <0.001). CA did not reduce mortality and HF readmission at one year irrespective of the type of HF, but significantly reduce readmission due to AF. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33002464     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaoyang Gu; Jing Wu; Xiaofei Gao; Meijun Liu; Chaolun Jin; Yizhou Xu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.287

2.  Differences in Stroke or Systemic Thromboembolism Readmission Risk After Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.

Authors:  Harshith S Thyagaturu; Alexander Bolton; Sittinun Thangjui; Kashyap Shah; Bishesh Shrestha; Dinesh Voruganti; Daniel Katz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-05

3.  Impact of catheter ablation in patients with atrial flutter and concurrent heart failure.

Authors:  Chinmay Jani; Shilpkumar Arora; Zachary Zuzek; Rahul Jaswaney; Samarthkumar Thakkar; Harsh P Patel; Sopan Lahewala; Nirav Arora; Richard Josephson; Abhishek Deshmukh; Juan Viles-Gonzalez; Mohammed Najeeb Osman; Jayakumar Sahadevan; Brian D Hoit; Judith A Mackall
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-11-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.