| Literature DB >> 33002463 |
Fabian Barbieri1, Agne Adukauskaite1, Anna Heidbreder2, Elisabeth Brandauer2, Melanie Bergmann2, Ambra Stefani2, Evi Holzknecht2, Thomas Senoner1, Andrea Rubatscher1, Wilfried Schgör1, Markus Stühlinger1, Bernhard Erich Pfeifer3, Axel Bauer1, Florian Hintringer1, Birgit Högl2, Wolfgang Dichtl4.
Abstract
The role of central sleep apnea (CSA) in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) remains speculative. In a prospective trial entitled UPGRADE, the presence of CSA was assessed by single-night polysomnography (PSG) in 54 PICM patients within 1 month after left ventricular lead implantation (with biventricular stimulation still not activated). CSA was diagnosed in half of patients (n = 27). Patients with moderate or severe CSA were randomized to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) versus right ventricular pacing (RVP) in a double-blinded cross-over design and re-scheduled for a follow-up PSG within 3 to 5 months. After crossing-over of stimulation mode another PSG was conducted 3 to 5 months later. CRT led to a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and significant reduction in left ventricular end systolic volumes and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels, whereas no significant effects were observed with ongoing RVP. CSA was significantly improved after 3.9 (3.2 to 4.4) months of CRT: apnea-hypopnea index decreased from 39.1 (32.1 to 54.0) events per hour at baseline to 22.2/h (10.9 to 36.7) by CRT (p <0.001). Central apnea index decreased from 27.1/h (17.7 to 36.1) at baseline to 6.8/h (1.1 to 14.4) after CRT activation (p <0.001). Ongoing RVP yielded only a minor improvement in apnea-hypopnea index and central apnea index. Pre-existent CSA did not affect structural response rate and had no impact on mid-term follow-up (median 2.8 years). In conclusion, CSA is highly prevalent in patients with PICM. CRT upgrading significantly improves CSA leading to a similar outcome in PICM patients without pre-existent CSA.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33002463 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Cardiol ISSN: 0002-9149 Impact factor: 2.778