Literature DB >> 33002256

Physiological sex differences affect the integrative response to exercise: acute and chronic implications.

Paul Ansdell1, Kevin Thomas1, Kirsty M Hicks1, Sandra K Hunter2, Glyn Howatson1,3, Stuart Goodall1.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the topic of this review? We review sex differences within physiological systems implicated in exercise performance; specifically, how they integrate to determine metabolic thresholds and fatigability. Thereafter, we discuss the implications that these sex differences might have for long-term adaptation to exercise. What advances does it highlight? The review collates evidence from recent physiological studies that have investigated sex as a biological variable, demonstrating that the physiological response to equivalent 'dosages' of exercise is not the same in males and females; thus, highlighting the need to research diversity in physiological responses to interventions. ABSTRACT: The anatomical and physiological differences between males and females are thought to determine differences in the limits of human performance. The notion of studying sex as a biological variable has recently been emphasized in the biosciences as a vital step in enhancing human health. In this review, we contend that the effects of biological sex on acute and chronic responses must be studied and accounted for when prescribing aerobic exercise, much like any intervention targeting the optimization of physiological function. Emerging evidence suggests that the response of physiological systems to exercise differs between males and females, potentially mediating the beneficial effects in healthy and clinical populations. We highlight evidence that integrative metabolic thresholds during exercise are influenced by phenotypical sex differences throughout many physiological systems. Furthermore, we discuss evidence that female skeletal muscle is more resistant to fatigue elicited by equivalent dosages of high-intensity exercise. How the different acute responses affect the long-term trainability of males and females is considered, with discussion about tailoring exercise to the characteristics of the individual presented within the context of biological sex. Finally, we highlight the influence of endogenous and exogenous sex hormones on physiological responses to exercise in females. Sex is one of many mediating influences on the outcomes of exercise, and with careful experimental designs, physiologists can advance the collective understanding of diversity in physiology and optimize outcomes for both sexes.
© 2020 The Authors. Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise; fatigue; sex; training

Year:  2020        PMID: 33002256     DOI: 10.1113/EP088548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  30 in total

1.  Insulin blood-brain barrier transport and interactions are greater following exercise in mice.

Authors:  Caitlin Brown; Sarah Pemberton; Alice Babin; Noor Abdulhameed; Cassidy Noonan; Mary Beth Brown; William A Banks; Elizabeth M Rhea
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 2.  Endocrine responses of the stress system to different types of exercise.

Authors:  Nikolaos Athanasiou; Gregory C Bogdanis; George Mastorakos
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  Exogenous Ketone Supplements in Athletic Contexts: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Mark Evans; Tyler S McClure; Andrew P Koutnik; Brendan Egan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 4.  Representation of adults with rheumatoid arthritis in US-based randomized controlled exercise trials: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  The Performance, Physiology and Morphology of Female and Male Olympic-Distance Triathletes.

Authors:  Paulo J Puccinelli; Claudio A B de Lira; Rodrigo L Vancini; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann; Marilia S Andrade
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25

6.  Morning Exercise Reduces Abdominal Fat and Blood Pressure in Women; Evening Exercise Increases Muscular Performance in Women and Lowers Blood Pressure in Men.

Authors:  Paul J Arciero; Stephen J Ives; Alex E Mohr; Nathaniel Robinson; Daniela Escudero; Jake Robinson; Kayla Rose; Olivia Minicucci; Gabriel O'Brien; Kathryn Curran; Vincent J Miller; Feng He; Chelsea Norton; Maia Paul; Caitlin Sheridan; Sheriden Beard; Jessica Centore; Monique Dudar; Katy Ehnstrom; Dakembay Hoyte; Heather Mak; Aaliyah Yarde
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Twelve weeks of sprint interval training increases peak cardiac output in previously untrained individuals.

Authors:  William Bostad; Sydney E Valentino; Devin G McCarthy; Douglas L Richards; Martin J MacInnis; Maureen J MacDonald; Martin J Gibala
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Exercising for Insulin Sensitivity - Is There a Mechanistic Relationship With Quantitative Changes in Skeletal Muscle Mass?

Authors:  Jasmine Paquin; Jean-Christophe Lagacé; Martin Brochu; Isabelle J Dionne
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Metabolic effects of high-intensity interval training and essential amino acids.

Authors:  Katie R Hirsch; Casey E Greenwalt; Hannah E Cabre; Lacey M Gould; Gabrielle J Brewer; Malia N M Blue; Arny A Ferrando; Kim M Huffman; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Eric D Ryan; Abbie E Smith-Ryan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Sex Differences Across the Life Course: A Focus On Unique Nutritional and Health Considerations among Women.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Tieraona Low Dog; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Sai Krupa Das; Fiona C Baker; Zeynep Madak-Erdogan; Billy R Hammond; Howard D Sesso; Alex Eapen; Susan H Mitmesser; Andrea Wong; Haiuyen Nguyen
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.687

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.