Literature DB >> 33002202

A novel preoperative risk score to optimize patient selection for performing concomitant liver resection with cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC.

Rachel M Lee1,2, Adriana C Gamboa1,2, Michael K Turgeon1,2, Mohammad Y Zaidi2,3, Charles Kimbrough2,4, Jennifer Leiting2,5, Travis Grotz2,6, Andrew J Lee2,7, Keith Fournier2,6, Benjamin Powers2,8,9, Sean Dineen2,8,9, Joel M Baumgartner2,10, Jula Veerapong2,10, Harveshp Mogal2,11, Callisia Clarke2,11, Gregory Wilson2,12, Sameer Patel2,12, Ryan Hendrix2,13, Laura Lambert2,14, Courtney Pokrzywa2,15, Daniel E Abbott2,15, Christopher J LaRocca2,16, Mustafa Raoof2,16, Jonathan Greer2, Fabian M Johnston2,17, Charles A Staley1,2, Jordan M Cloyd2,4, Shishir K Maithel1,2, Maria C Russell1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC.
METHODS: Patients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000-2017) with invasive appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary, curative intent CRS/HIPEC with CC0-1 resection were included. LR was defined as a formal parenchymal resection. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: A total of 658 patients were included. About 83 (15%) underwent LR of colorectal (58%) or invasive appendiceal (42%) metastases. LR patients had more complications (81% vs. 60%; p = .001), greater number of complications (2.3 vs. 1.5; p < .001) per patient and required more reoperations (22% vs. 11%; p = .007) and readmissions (39% vs. 25%; p = .014) than non-LR patients. LR patients had decreased OS (2-year OS 62% vs. 79%, p < .001), even when accounting for peritoneal carcinomatosis index and histology type. Preoperative factors associated with decreased OS on multivariable analysis in LR patients included age < 60 years (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.10-11.81), colorectal histology (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.69-12.65), and multiple liver tumors (HR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.21-9.85) (all p < .05). When assigning one point for each factor, there was an incremental decrease in 2-year survival as the risk score increased from 0 to 3 (0: 100%; 1: 91%; 2: 58%; 3: 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: As CRS/HIPEC + LR has become more common, we created a simple risk score to stratify patients considered for CRS/HIPEC + LR. These data aid in striking the balance between an increased perioperative complication profile with the potential for improvement in OS.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIPEC; appendiceal adenocarcinoma; colorectal cancer; liver resection; risk score

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33002202      PMCID: PMC7957345          DOI: 10.1002/jso.26239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  19 in total

Review 1.  Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Hughes; Nicholas T Ventham; Ewen M Harrison; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Treatment of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Elias; E Benizri; M Pocard; M Ducreux; V Boige; P Lasser
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Synchronous liver resection with cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of liver and peritoneal metastases from colon cancer: results from an Australian centre.

Authors:  Nayef Alzahrani; Lawson Ung; Sarah J Valle; Winston Liauw; David L Morris
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Morbidity and mortality analysis of 200 treatments with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the coliseum technique.

Authors:  A D Stephens; R Alderman; D Chang; G D Edwards; J Esquivel; G Sebbag; M A Steves; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Predictors of progression in high-grade appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Joel M Baumgartner; Laura Tobin; Sean F Heavey; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Eric J Roeland; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Safety and efficacy of combined resection of colorectal peritoneal and liver metastases.

Authors:  Stephanie Downs-Canner; Yongli Shuai; Lekshmi Ramalingam; James F Pingpank; Matthew P Holtzman; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Comparison of long-term oncological outcomes of appendiceal cancer and colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Il Tae Son; Soyeon Ahn; Kyu Joo Park; Jae Hwan Oh; Seung-Yong Jeong; Hyoung-Chul Park; Seung Chul Heo; Eui Gon Youk; Jin-Taek Park; Myong Hoon Ihn; Heung-Kwon Oh; Duck-Woo Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 8.  Colorectal Cancer in the Young.

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-28

9.  The Fifth International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy (Milan, Italy, December 4-6, 2006): methodology of disease-specific consensus.

Authors:  Dario Baratti; Shigeki Kusamura; Marcello Deraco
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 10.  Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  P C Simmonds; J N Primrose; J L Colquitt; O J Garden; G J Poston; M Rees
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.