BACKGROUND: Surgeons play a pivotal role in combating the opioid crisis that currently grips the United States. Changing surgeon behavior is difficult, and the degree to which behavioral science can steer surgeons toward decreased opioid prescribing is unclear. METHODS: This was a single-institution, single-arm, pre- and postintervention study examining the prescribing of opioids by urologists for adult patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the quantity of opioids prescribed in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) after hospital discharge. The primary exposure was a multipronged behavioral intervention designed to decrease opioid prescribing. The intervention had 3 components: 1) formal education, 2) individual audit feedback, and 3) peer comparison performance feedback. There were 3 phases to the study: a pre-intervention phase, an intervention phase, and a washout phase. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two patients underwent prostatectomy, and 306 patients underwent nephrectomy. The median OMEs decreased from 195 to 19 in the prostatectomy patients and from 200 to 0 in the nephrectomy patients (P < .05 for both). The median OMEs prescribed did not increase during the washout phase. Prostatectomy patients discharged with opioids had higher levels of anxiety than patients discharged without opioids (P < .05). Otherwise, prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients discharged with and without opioids did not differ in their perception of postoperative pain management, activity levels, psychiatric symptoms, or somatic symptoms (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a multipronged behavioral intervention significantly reduced opioid prescribing for patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy without compromising patient-reported outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Surgeons play a pivotal role in combating the opioid crisis that currently grips the United States. Changing surgeon behavior is difficult, and the degree to which behavioral science can steer surgeons toward decreased opioid prescribing is unclear. METHODS: This was a single-institution, single-arm, pre- and postintervention study examining the prescribing of opioids by urologists for adult patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the quantity of opioids prescribed in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) after hospital discharge. The primary exposure was a multipronged behavioral intervention designed to decrease opioid prescribing. The intervention had 3 components: 1) formal education, 2) individual audit feedback, and 3) peer comparison performance feedback. There were 3 phases to the study: a pre-intervention phase, an intervention phase, and a washout phase. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two patients underwent prostatectomy, and 306 patients underwent nephrectomy. The median OMEs decreased from 195 to 19 in the prostatectomy patients and from 200 to 0 in the nephrectomy patients (P < .05 for both). The median OMEs prescribed did not increase during the washout phase. Prostatectomy patients discharged with opioids had higher levels of anxiety than patients discharged without opioids (P < .05). Otherwise, prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients discharged with and without opioids did not differ in their perception of postoperative pain management, activity levels, psychiatric symptoms, or somatic symptoms (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a multipronged behavioral intervention significantly reduced opioid prescribing for patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy without compromising patient-reported outcomes.
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee; Jenna Goesling; Stephanie Moser; Paul Lin; Michael J Englesbe; Amy S B Bohnert; Sachin Kheterpal; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Austin J Lee; Jonathan G Yabes; Nathan Hale; Ronald L Hrebinko; Jeffrey R Gingrich; Jodi K Maranchie; Mina M Fam; Robert M Turner I I; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce Ben-David; Bruce L Jacobs Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 1.344
Authors: William T Lowrance; James A Eastham; Caroline Savage; A C Maschino; Vincent P Laudone; Christopher B Dechet; Robert A Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Jaspreet S Sandhu Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Katherine M Theisen; John M Myrga; Nathan Hale; Gerald Cochran; Craig Sewall; Liam C Macleod; Bruce L Jacobs; Benjamin J Davies Journal: Urology Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ahmed Khalil; Swaytha Ganesh; Christopher Hughes; Amit D Tevar; John J Hasche; Stephen Esper; Abhinav Humar Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Allison Kirkegaard; Zachary Wagner; Louis T Mariano; Meghan C Martinez; Xiaowei Sherry Yan; Robert J Romanelli; Katherine E Watkins Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Ryan Howard; Craig S Brown; Yen-Ling Lai; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Kao-Ping Chua; Chad Brummett; Michael Englesbe; Jennifer Waljee; Mark C Bicket Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kristian D Stensland; Peter Chang; David Jiang; David Canes; Aaron Berkenwald; Adrian Waisman; Kortney Robinson; Gabriel Brat; Catrina Crociani; Kyle Mcanally; Sarah Hyde; Brian Holliday; Jodi Mechaber; Analesa Baraka; Alireza Moinzadeh; Andrew A Wagner Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 2.257