Literature DB >> 33002117

Humans' pupillary contagion extends to cats and dogs.

Emma L Axelsson1,2, Christine Fawcett2.   

Abstract

When viewing pupil sizes change, our own pupil sizes change, a phenomenon known as pupillary contagion. This involuntary response is reliable between humans but can be affected by familiarity and empathy. We investigated whether the pupillary contagion response occurs for humans viewing familiar species-cats and dogs-and whether it is modulated by preferences for particular species. Pupil sizes were measured while viewing cat, dog and human images with small, medium and large pupils. Trait empathy, cat and dog affiliation and experience were subsequently measured. There was an image pupil size effect, but this did not vary by species. There was greater pupil size change to cats and dogs than to humans, but this might have been due to the varying size and appearance of the cats and dogs. Greater dog affiliation was also associated with smaller overall pupil size change to dogs and larger change to humans, but this did not interact with image pupil size. Dog affiliation might be associated with less arousal to dog images. In sum, pupillary contagion responses indicate a spontaneous transfer of information about internal states and the findings suggest that humans are sensitive to this across species, regardless of individual preference.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cat person; conspecifics; dog person; empathy; pet ownership; pupillary contagion; pupillometry

Year:  2021        PMID: 33002117      PMCID: PMC7812621          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  43 in total

1.  Development of the cat-owner relationship scale (CORS).

Authors:  Tiffani J Howell; Jonathan Bowen; Jaume Fatjó; Paula Calvo; Anna Holloway; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry.

Authors:  Tanya L Chartrand; Jessica L Lakin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Pupillary Contagion in Infancy: Evidence for Spontaneous Transfer of Arousal.

Authors:  Christine Fawcett; Victoria Wesevich; Gustaf Gredebäck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-05-09

4.  Pupil Mimicry Correlates With Trust in In-Group Partners With Dilating Pupils.

Authors:  M E Kret; A H Fischer; C K W De Dreu
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-07-31

5.  Flow of affective information between communicating brains.

Authors:  Silke Anders; Jakob Heinzle; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Thomas Ethofer; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Humans process dog and human facial affect in similar ways.

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Cui Shan Seow; Trevor B Penney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Chimpanzees and humans mimic pupil-size of conspecifics.

Authors:  Mariska E Kret; Masaki Tomonaga; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin.

Authors:  Andrea Beetz; Kerstin Uvnäs-Moberg; Henri Julius; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-09

9.  Why do animal eyes have pupils of different shapes?

Authors:  Martin S Banks; William W Sprague; Jürgen Schmoll; Jared A Q Parnell; Gordon D Love
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Human eyes with dilated pupils induce pupillary contagion in infants.

Authors:  Christine Fawcett; Melda Arslan; Terje Falck-Ytter; Herbert Roeyers; Gustaf Gredebäck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Small Pupils Lead to Lower Judgements of a Person's Characteristics for Exaggerated, but Not for Realistic Pupils.

Authors:  Wee Kiat Lau; Marian Sauter; Anke Huckauf
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  Being 'in sync'-is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain?

Authors:  Annett Schirmer; Merle Fairhurst; Stefanie Hoehl
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.