Literature DB >> 33001780

How to Measure Glenoid Bone Stock and Version and Why It Is Important: A Practical Guide.

Arghavan Sharifi1, Matthew J Siebert1, Avneesh Chhabra1.   

Abstract

Shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and debilitating condition and a source of high morbidity and medical expenditures across the world among individuals older than 60 years. Shoulder OA results in the gradual destruction of articular cartilage of the humeral head and glenoid component, causing inflammation, pain, and a restricted range of motion. Most patients are diagnosed with shoulder OA after experiencing shoulder pain and stiffness, and the diagnosis is often made after medical and physical histories are obtained and physical and imaging examinations are performed. Use of various surgical techniques such as total anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty has increased in recent years, resulting in reduced morbidity and improved functional status of patients. However, the rate of surgical complications such as premature loosening of components is significant, reducing the effectiveness of such procedures. Data in the literature indicate that high-grade fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle before surgery is associated with postoperative glenoid component loosening. High-grade rotator cuff fatty infiltration and atrophy have been found to be associated with more severe Walch classification-based glenoid morphology subtypes, increased joint line medialization, glenoid bone loss, and increased pathologic glenoid version. The authors describe how advanced imaging techniques are used for preoperative evaluation of the shoulder and discuss how to measure glenoid version and bone stock and classify glenoid morphology types on the basis of Walch classification, as these parameters are commonly used in surgical planning. Methods involving the use of Friedman and paleoglenoid lines for respective measurements are illustrated by using three-dimensional CT and MRI case examples. ©RSNA, 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33001780     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  4 in total

1.  Glenoid Version Assessment When the CT Field of View Does Not Permit the Friedman Method: The Robertson Method.

Authors:  Douglas D Robertson; Gulshan B Sharma; Patrick J McMahon; Spero G Karas
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  Posterior Glenoid Osteotomy With Capsulolabral Repair Improves Resistance Forces in a Critical Glenoid Bone Loss Model.

Authors:  Stephen E Marcaccio; Ryan M O'Donnel; Rachel Schilkowsky; Meng Brett D Owens; Steven L Bokshan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-15

Review 3.  Cystic lesions of the humeral head on magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Mohammad Danish Mangi; Steven Zadow; Wanyin Lim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-08

4.  Magnetic resonance arthrography in patients with multidirectional instability: could inferior capsulsar width be considered the cornerstone in the diagnosis of non-traumatic shoulder instability?

Authors:  Angelica Celentano; Marco Porta; Marco Calvi; Giuseppe Basile; Alberto Aliprandi; Eugenio Annibale Genovese
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.128

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.