Literature DB >> 33000288

[Coercion in psychiatry: practical consequences of ethical aspects].

Hanfried Helmchen1.   

Abstract

Within the framework of the legal and ethical requirements of the application of coercion in psychiatry, the perspective of its prevention is discussed. Coercion is permissible exclusively in cases of incapability of self-determination and immediate specific danger for the patient's physical integrity or life. Practical difficulties in assessing these criteria are illustrated by means of case examples. Preventive procedures for avoidance of coercion (advance directives, trust-building procedures, recognition of influence of context, sensitization against coercion) as well as clarification of indications and control of the application of coercion and a change of attitude toward assistance of decision aim at strengthening respect for the right to self-determination of the mentally ill and thereby to fairly balance the psychiatrist's conflict between responsibility for care and respect for the right of self-determination of the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assistance of decision; Capacity of self-determination; Control of coercion; Prevention of coercion; Sensitization against coercion

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33000288     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-020-00998-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  2 in total

1.  [Mental illness without institutions. A field study in the Canton of Fribourg in 1875].

Authors:  K Ernst
Journal:  Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr       Date:  1983

2.  Reflecting on the Reasons Pros and Cons Coercive Measures for Patients in Psychiatric and Somatic Care: The Role of Clinical Ethics Consultation. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Elena Montaguti; Jan Schürmann; Charlotte Wetterauer; Mario Picozzi; Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Christine Clavien; Stefan Kaiser; Samia Hurst
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.