Literature DB >> 32999888

Fecal Lactoferrin and Other Stool Markers during Normal Pregnancy and in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Prospective Study and Review of the Literature.

James M Gray1, Kristin Knight1, Vu Q Nguyen1, Marrieth G Rubio1, Lauren Irby2, James H Boone2, Dario Sorrentino1,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) - both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) - during pregnancy can be challenging since most monitoring tools available in nonpregnant patients are contraindicated.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to test whether fecal inflammatory markers - specifically fecal lactoferrin - physiologically change during normal pregnancy as a prerequisite to use them to monitor IBD activity during pregnancy.
METHODS: Fecal lactoferrin was tested in healthy pregnant and nonpregnant women from the same geographic area and age range (18-40 years) - all negative for clinical gastrointestinal tract inflammation. A retrospective review of fecal lactoferrin levels contrasted with the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD, and the Disease Activity Index for UC was also performed in women with active IBDs within the same age range and geographical area.
RESULTS: In 30 nonpregnant subjects, fecal lactoferrin levels were 0.87 ± 1.08 μg/g. In 49 pregnant subjects, levels were 0.59 ± 0.83, 0.87 ± 1.13, and 0.85 ± 1.06 μg/g during the first, second, and third trimester, respectively (p = 0.64), with average levels for the 3 trimesters of 0.81 ± 1.04 μg/g (p = 0.61 compared to nonpregnant subjects). Sequential fecal lactoferrin levels (n = 26) did not differ from one trimester to the other in the individual subjects (p = 0.80). In 45 female IBD patients (27 with CD and 18 with UC), fecal lactoferrin levels were correlated with disease activity as defined by the endoscopic scores: 218, 688, and 1,175 μg/g for CD and 931, 2,088, and 2,509 μg/g for UC, respectively, for mild, moderate, and severe activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Fecal lactoferrin levels during normal pregnancy are superimposable to those of nonpregnant women and significantly below levels in women of the same childbearing age with active IBDs. Additional published data - reviewed in this atricle - and our own indicate that fecal lactoferrin and other markers can be potentially used to monitor disease activity in pregnant IBD patients.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal lactoferrin; Inflammatory bowel diseases; Inflammatory markers; Intestinal mucosal inflammation; Pregnancy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32999888      PMCID: PMC7506241          DOI: 10.1159/000508970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inflamm Intest Dis        ISSN: 2296-9365


  37 in total

Review 1.  Pregnancy and pregnancy-associated hormones alter immune responses and disease pathogenesis.

Authors:  Dionne P Robinson; Sabra L Klein
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 2.  Diagnosis and assessment of Crohn's disease: the present and the future.

Authors:  Gianluca Benevento; Claudio Avellini; Giovanni Terrosu; Marco Geraci; Ilva Lodolo; Dario Sorrentino
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.869

Review 3.  Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Pregnancy: The Issues We Face Today.

Authors:  Oriana M Damas; Amar R Deshpande; Danny J Avalos; Maria T Abreu
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 9.071

Review 4.  Fecal markers in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Cong Dai; Min Jiang; Ming-Jun Sun
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  The immune system in pregnancy: a unique complexity.

Authors:  Gil Mor; Ingrid Cardenas
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Secretion of methotrexate into human milk.

Authors:  D G Johns; L D Rutherford; P C Leighton; C L Vogel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Fecal Calprotectin Is Not Affected by Pregnancy: Clinical Implications for the Management of Pregnant Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Mette Julsgaard; Christian L Hvas; Richard B Gearry; Thea Vestergaard; Jan Fallingborg; Lise Svenningsen; Jens Kjeldsen; Miles P Sparrow; Signe Wildt; Jens Kelsen; Sally J Bell
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.325

8.  Meta-analysis: the impact of disease activity at conception on disease activity during pregnancy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  A Abhyankar; M Ham; A C Moss
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Fear and fertility in inflammatory bowel disease: a mismatch of perception and reality affects family planning decisions.

Authors:  Réme Mountifield; Peter Bampton; Ruth Prosser; Kate Muller; Jane M Andrews
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 10.  Managing inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Matthew Pinder; Katie Lummis; Christian P Selinger
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.