AIMS: The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to examine the feasibility of providing high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) treatment to people with chronic aphasia, with the goal of evoking changes in spoken language; and (2) to identify evidence of AAC-induced changes in brain activation. METHOD & PROCEDURES: We employed a pre- post-treatment design with a control (usual care) group to observe the impact of an AAC treatment on aphasia severity and spoken discourse. Further, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine associated neural reorganization. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Compared to the usual care group, the AAC intervention trended toward larger treatment effects and resulted in a higher number of responders on behavioral outcomes. Both groups demonstrated a trend toward greater leftward lateralization of language functions via fMRI. Secondary analyses of responders to treatment revealed increased activation in visual processing regions, primarily for the AAC group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary guidance regarding how to implement AAC treatment in a manner that simultaneously facilitates language recovery across a variety of aphasia types and severity levels while compensating for residual deficits in people with chronic aphasia. Further, this work motivates continued efforts to unveil the role of AAC-based interventions in the aphasia recovery process and provides insight regarding the neurobiological mechanisms supporting AAC-induced language changes.
AIMS: The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to examine the feasibility of providing high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) treatment to people with chronic aphasia, with the goal of evoking changes in spoken language; and (2) to identify evidence of AAC-induced changes in brain activation. METHOD & PROCEDURES: We employed a pre- post-treatment design with a control (usual care) group to observe the impact of an AAC treatment on aphasia severity and spoken discourse. Further, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine associated neural reorganization. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Compared to the usual care group, the AAC intervention trended toward larger treatment effects and resulted in a higher number of responders on behavioral outcomes. Both groups demonstrated a trend toward greater leftward lateralization of language functions via fMRI. Secondary analyses of responders to treatment revealed increased activation in visual processing regions, primarily for the AAC group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary guidance regarding how to implement AAC treatment in a manner that simultaneously facilitates language recovery across a variety of aphasia types and severity levels while compensating for residual deficits in people with chronic aphasia. Further, this work motivates continued efforts to unveil the role of AAC-based interventions in the aphasia recovery process and provides insight regarding the neurobiological mechanisms supporting AAC-induced language changes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aphasia; Augmentative and Alternative Communication; Cortical Plasticity; Neuroimaging; fMRI
Authors: Kwang Ki Kim; Prasanna Karunanayaka; Michael D Privitera; Scott K Holland; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Sonia L E Brownsett; Jane E Warren; Fatemeh Geranmayeh; Zoe Woodhead; Robert Leech; Richard J S Wise Journal: Brain Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Tigran R Petrosyan; Armenuhi V Avagyan; Anush A Petrosyan; Tatev V Margaryan; Hasmik H Mkrtchyan Journal: J Psycholinguist Res Date: 2022-01-10
Authors: Sigfus Kristinsson; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Roger Newman-Norlund; Jean Neils-Strunjas; Julius Fridriksson Journal: J Stroke Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 8.632