Literature DB >> 32999465

Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.

Peter Ka-Fung Chiu1, Ka-Lun Lo2, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh1, Siu-Fai Ma1, Chi-Ho Leung1, Ho-Fai Wong1, Kai-Man Li2, Kittisak Sae-Lo1, Sze-Wan Kwok1, Suk-Yin Li1, Chi-Hang Yee1, See-Ming Hou1, Chi-Fai Ng3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of a freehand transperineal (TP) systematic prostate biopsy protocol under local anaesthesia (LA) and the value of different sectors in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: A total of 611 consecutive freehand TP biopsies under LA in 2 hospitals were prospectively evaluated. Cancer detection rate in each of the four different sectors (anterior, mid, posterior, basal) was recorded to evaluate the value of each sector. Procedure tolerability was assessed by pain score and complications were documented.
RESULTS: Systematic biopsies were performed in 556 out of 611 men with a median of 20 (IQR 12-24) biopsy cores taken. The median PSA was 9.9 (Inter-quartile range[IQR] 6.4-16.2) ng/mL, and 89.0% were first biopsies. All PCa and ISUP grade group (GG) ≥ 2 PCa (HGPCa) were diagnosed in 41.4% (230/556) and 28.2% (157/556) biopsies respectively. 77.0% HGPCa was diagnosed in ≥2 sectors. Single-sector HGPCa was predominantly found in anterior or posterior sector. Omitting base sector would have missed 1.5% (1/65) HGPCa out of the 219 cases with ≥24-core biopsies performed. Further omission of mid sector would have missed 3.1% (2/65) HGPCa and 7.4% (7/94) ISUP GG1 PCa (in which 3/7 involved 2 sectors). LA TP biopsy was well tolerated and the mean pain scores of the different steps of the procedure were between 1.9-3.1 (out of 10). Post-biopsy fever occurred in 0.3% of patients (2/611) and no sepsis was reported. The risk of urinary retention in men with ≥20 cores in ≥60 ml prostate was 7.8% (14/179), compared with 1.7% (7/423) in other groups (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: TP sectoral prostate biopsy under LA was well tolerated with minimal sepsis risk. Basal sector biopsies had minimal additional value to HGPCa detection and its omission can be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32999465     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00293-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of transperineal and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  K L Lo; K L Chui; C H Leung; S F Ma; K Lim; T Ng; J Wong; J K M Li; S K Mak; C F Ng
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.227

2.  The Use of Transperineal Sector Biopsy as A First-Line Biopsy Strategy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  David Eldred-Evans; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Fahd Khan; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Alexander Polson; Peter Acher; Richard Popert
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.510

  2 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Emily Cheng; Meenakshi Davuluri; Patrick J Lewicki; Jim C Hu; Spyridon P Basourakos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.808

Review 2.  Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Mark N Alshak; Patrick J Lewicki; Emily Cheng; Michael Tzeng; Antonio P DeRosa; Mathew J Allaway; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Hiten D Patel; Jim C Hu; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

3.  Oral antibiotics perturbation on gut microbiota after prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Joseph Kai Man Li; Lynn Lin Wang; Becky Su Yan Lau; Ryan Tsz Hei Tse; Carol Ka Lo Cheng; Steven Chi Ho Leung; Christine Yim Ping Wong; Stephen Kwok Wing Tsui; Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh; Peter Ka Fung Chiu; Chi Fai Ng
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.073

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.