Literature DB >> 32998715

Correction to: Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care.

Morten Magelssen1, Heidi Karlsen2, Reidar Pedersen2, Lisbeth Thoresen3.   

Abstract

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32998715      PMCID: PMC7526179          DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00534-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Ethics        ISSN: 1472-6939            Impact factor:   2.834


Correction to: BMC Med Ethics 2020, 21: 82 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00522-1 It was highlighted that the original article [1] contained an error in Table 2. This Correction article shows the correct Table 2. The original article has been updated.
Table 2

Data sources in the project and the main topics they address

Qualitative data
Data sourceMain topics
1Three focus group interviews with key persons, in addition to audio recordings and notes from all dialogue seminarsKey persons’ experiences with work in the CECs, experienced challenges, and perceived impact of the training received
2One focus group interview with each of the participating CECs in full, towards the end of the study periodExperiences and challenges with work in the CEC, including case deliberation. Perceived impact on services, municipality and CEC members
3Individual interviews with the head of each municipality’s health and care sectorPerceived impact on services and municipality. Municipal support for the CEC
4Individual interviews (up to 20) with professionals who have been involved in a case discussed in the CECPractical consequences of CEC involvement. Experiences with taking part in CEC deliberations
5Individual interviews (up to 15) with patients and next of kin who have been involved in a CEC deliberationPractical consequences of CEC involvement. Experiences with taking part in CEC deliberations
6CEC deliberation reports (anonymized)Nature of ethical issues. Characteristics of the CECs’ ethical reasoning
7Observation of CEC deliberations (1-2 per CEC)Deliberation process. Involvement of stakeholders
Quantitative data
Data sourceMain topics
8CECs’ yearly reportsCEC activities such as seminars, other outreach, number of attendees, services involved. CEC members
9CEC deliberation reports (anonymized) and committee’s self-evaluation form for each caseQuantitative data about CEC cases
Data sources in the project and the main topics they address
  1 in total

1.  Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care.

Authors:  Morten Magelssen; Heidi Karlsen; Reidar Pedersen; Lisbeth Thoresen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.