| Literature DB >> 32998587 |
Yanhai Xi1, Wenming Pan2, Dan Xi3, Xue Liu4, Jiangmin Yu1, Mintao Xue1, Ning Xu1, Jiankun Wen1, Weiheng Wang1, Hailong He1, Yanyan Liu5, Yue He5, Chunjing Guo4, Daquan Chen4,6,7, Xiaojian Ye1.
Abstract
Herein, electrospun zinc oxide nanoparticle/poly (vinylidene fluoride) (ZnONP/PVDF) composite fiber membranes were designed, fabricated, and tested for improved orthopedic applications. A single factor screening study was conducted to determine the optimal ZnONP/PVDF formulation based on osteoblast (bone forming cells) proliferation and antibacterial properties. Further, ZnONP/PVDF materials were characterized for their morphology, crystallinity, roughness, piezoelectric properties, and chemistry to understand such cell results. The optimal concentration of high molecular weight PVDF (18%, w/v) and a low concentration of ZnONPs (1 mg/ml) were identified for electrospinning at room temperature in order to inhibit bacterial colonization (without resorting to antibiotic use) and promote osteoblast proliferation. Compared to no ZnO/PVDF scaffold without Piezo-excited group,the study showed that on the 1 mg/ml ZnO/PVDF scaffolds with piezo-excitation, the density of SA and E.coli decreased by 68% and 56%.The density of osteoblasts doubled within three days(compared to the control). In summary, ZnONP/PVDF composite fiber membranes were formulated by electrospinning showing an exceptional ability to eliminate bacteria colonization while at the same time promote osteoblast functions and, thus, they should be further studied for a wide range of orthopedic applications.Entities:
Keywords: Electrospinning; fluoride composite fiber membrane; nanoparticles; piezoelectricity; zinc oxide/polyvinylidene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32998587 PMCID: PMC7580840 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2020.1827084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Figure 1.(A) The content of β crystal forms in composite fiber membranes with different molecular weight PVDF. (B) The content of β crystals in the composite fiber membranes with different concentrations of PVDF. (C) The content of β crystals in composite fiber membranes with different concentrations of ZnO. (D) β crystal content of PVDF fiber membrane at different spinning temperatures; Values are mean ± STDEV, N = 3, *p < 0.05. (E) The structure of electrospinning.
Figure 2.(A) XRD patterns of the three prescriptions, No.7, 8 and 9 correspond to PVDF (solid powder), PVDF spinning and ZnO-PVDF (18%) spinning. (B) Scanning electron microscopy of pure PVDF (left) and PVDF/ZnO (right). (C) Infrared spectrum of PVDF. (D) Infrared spectrum of PVDF fiber membrane.
Figure 3.Antibacterial experiment of composite fiber membrane; (Control group (−): No ZnO/PVDF scaffold without piezo-excited, Control group (+): 1 mg/ml ZnO/PVDF scaffold without piezo-excited). Values are mean ± STDEV; N = 3, *p < 0.05.
Figure 4.The effect of piezoelectric treatment on osteoblast (OB) density for 1–3 days when cultured on ZnO/PVDF scaffolds (Control group: OB cell Density of Day1); Values are mean ± STDEV N = 6, *p < 0.05.