| Literature DB >> 32998392 |
Marianna Dionisi1, Federico Alessandro Ruffinatti1, Beatrice Riva1, Dmitry Lim1, Annalisa Canta2, Cristina Meregalli2, Giulia Fumagalli2, Laura Monza2, Antonio Ferrer-Montiel3, Asia Fernandez-Carvajal3, Guido Cavaletti2, Armando A Genazzani1, Carla Distasi1.
Abstract
Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy is characterized by an acute hyperexcitability syndrome triggered/exacerbated by cold. The mechanisms underlying oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy are unclear, but the alteration of ion channel expression and activity plays a well-recognized central role. Recently, we found that oxaliplatin leads to cytosolic acidification in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Here, we investigated the early impact of oxaliplatin on the proton-sensitive TREK potassium channels. Following a 6-h oxaliplatin treatment, both channels underwent a transcription upregulation that returned to control levels after 42 h. The overexpression of TREK channels was also observed after in vivo treatment in DRG cells from mice exposed to acute treatment with oxaliplatin. Moreover, both intracellular pH and TREK channel transcription were similarly regulated after incubation with amiloride, an inhibitor of the Na+/H+ exchanger. In addition, we studied the role of oxaliplatin-induced acidification on channel behavior, and, as expected, we observed a robust positive modulation of TREK channel activity. Finally, we focused on the impact of this complex modulation on capsaicin-evoked neuronal activity finding a transient decrease in the average firing rate following 6 h of oxaliplatin treatment. In conclusion, the early activation of TREK genes may represent a mechanism of protection against the oxaliplatin-related perturbation of neuronal excitability.Entities:
Keywords: DRG neurons; Na+/H+ exchanger; TREK channels; TRPV1; electrophysiology; neuropathic pain; oxaliplatin; pH
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32998392 PMCID: PMC7584002 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Oxaliplatin transiently affects the transcription of TREK-1, TREK-2, and TRAAK channels. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of treated vs. control log2FC of gene expression, as measured through real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). (A) For each channel, oxaliplatin (OHP)-induced changes in mRNA level were measured in cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells after 6 h of treatment and 42 h later (n = 2 biological replicates, each in technical triplicate). (B) mRNA expression from DRG cells was measured upon in vivo acute and chronic OHP treatment and compared with the untreated counterpart (n = 4 biological replicates, each in technical triplicate). In both panels, controls are normalized to zero. ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001; Bonferroni-corrected multiple t-tests.
Figure 2Effects of amiloride on DRG cells. (A) Each bar represents the mean ± SEM of treated vs. control log2FC of gene expression, as measured through RT-qPCR. Data show a significant increase in all the K+ two-pore domain (K2P) channels considered in this analysis after 6 h of treatment with two different concentrations of amiloride (0.1 and 1 µM). The transcriptional effects of amiloride were assessed by testing the log2FC of each experimental condition against its reference control value normalized to zero. In each condition, experiments were performed in n = 4 biological replicates (each in technical triplicate). * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01, *** p-value < 0.001; ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test for each channel separately. (B) Blockade of Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) with 0.1–1 µM amiloride significantly decreased intracellular pH in DRG neurons (each box represents 100 to 150 cells from n = 4 independent experiments; *** p-value < 0.001; ANOVA and Dunnett’s post hoc test).
Figure 3Oxaliplatin-dependent cytosolic acidification modulates TREK-2 channel activity. (A) Single-channel recording at Vhold = +40 mV from an OHP treated DRG neuron, before and during nigericin perfusion. When nigericin sets the pH at physiological levels, TREK-2 channel activity strongly decreased. Insets show a magnification in three different time recording points (2 min before nigericin perfusion; 1 and 4 min after nigericin perfusion, respectively). (B) An exemplary single-channel current trace recorded in cell-attached configuration at Vhold = +40 mV from an OHP treated DRG neuron and the corresponding amplitude histogram. Two different levels of current could be observed: the smaller one (S) and the larger one (L). (C) I-V plot for the channel levels S and L shown in (B). (D) Single-channel currents recorded during voltage ramps in an OHP-treated neuron in a cell-attached patch with high potassium solution in the pipette. (E) Exemplary single-channel current trace recorded in an inside-out configuration during the stimulation with arachidonic acid (2 µM) in symmetrical K+ solutions. (F) Merge of the average of 10 current ramps recorded in the presence of arachidonic acid (red trace) with a single-channel ramp curve (black trace) taken from the same sample of the traces shown in (D).
Figure 4Effects of OHP treatment on spontaneous and evoked electrical activity in DRG neurons. (A) Trend of the percentage of basally active channels in control (black) and treated (red) conditions (mean ± SEM of n MEAs, with n ranging from 4 to 10). Data were analyzed through a linear regression of the log-transformed values, then the null hypothesis of zero-slope was tested. The percentage of spontaneously firing DRG neurons showed a positive trend in time when treated with OHP (p-value = 0.009) but not in control condition. (B) After 42 h from the treatment with OHP, the median firing rate per active channel resulted significantly higher (M0,OHP = 233 mHz, IQR0,OHP = [133; 500] mHz) compared to untreated condition (M0,ctrl = 117 mHz, IQR0,ctrl = [83; 250] mHz; ** p-value = 0.002, Mann–Whitney U test). (C) Three representative raster plots for each tested condition showing both spontaneous activity and extracellular action potentials (EAPs) detected during the application of 1 µM capsaicin (green box). (D) Box plots compare control (black) and OHP-treated (red) average spike frequency (in mHz) in the presence of capsaicin. After 6 h from cell plating, the capsaicin-induced median firing rate of the responsive channels was M6,ctrl = 267 mHz, IQR6,ctrl = [146; 600] mHz (86 channels, from n = 9 MEAs) and M6,OHP = 175 mHz, IQR6,OHP = [100; 321] mHz (90 channels from n = 9 MEAs) in control and treated conditions, respectively. After 24 h from cell plating, values were M24,ctrl = 425 mHz, IQR24,ctrl = [154; 967] mHz (72 channels, from n = 4 MEAs) and M24,OHP = 217 mHz, IQR24,OHP = [100; 567] mHz (96 channels, from n = 7 MEAs), in control condition and upon 6 h of OHP treatment, respectively. Finally, after 48 h from cell plating, values were M48,ctrl = 350 mHz, IQR48,ctrl = [150; 908] mHz (157 channels, from n = 6 MEAs) and M48,OHP = 400 mHz, IQR48,OHP = [183; 1050] mHz (155 channels, from n = 7 MEAs), in control condition and upon 6 h of OHP treatment, respectively. For all three comparisons, the Mann–Whitney U test was used and, at 6 h and 24 h, ** p-value < 0.01 (for exact p-values and effect sizes, see Table 1). In all the box plots, the box corresponds to the IQR, while the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum data points still within 2.2 IQRs off the lower and upper quartiles, respectively.
Descriptive and inferential statistics about the electrical response of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons to 1 µM capsaicin administration. M is the median of the average firing rate computed over a 1 min-window, starting from the beginning of the agonist perfusion. IQR, Q1, and Q2 are the interquartile range, the first and the third quartiles, respectively. Below are the number of capsaicin-responsive channels and the number of independent multielectrode arrays (MEAs) from which these channels come. For each time point, p-values refer to the independent sample Mann–Whitney U test. Finally, for each time point effect, size is given in terms of both correlation coefficient r and Cohens’s d.
| 6 h | 24 h | 48 h | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ctrl | OHP | Ctrl | OHP | Ctrl | OHP | |
| M (mHz) | 267 | 175 | 425 | 217 | 350 | 400 |
| IQR (mHz) | 454 | 221 | 813 | 467 | 758 | 867 |
| Q1 (mHz) | 146 | 100 | 154 | 100 | 150 | 183 |
| Q3 (mHz) | 600 | 321 | 967 | 567 | 908 | 1050 |
| 86 | 90 | 72 | 96 | 157 | 155 | |
| 9 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | |
| 0.0018 | 0.0091 | 0.2350 | ||||
|
| 0.2348 | 0.2012 | 0.0672 | |||
| Cohen’s | 0.1657 | 0.3872 | 0.0670 | |||