Literature DB >> 32997805

Application of Bioavailability Models to Derive Chronic Guideline Values for Nickel in Freshwaters of Australia and New Zealand.

Jenny Stauber1, Lisa Golding1, Adam Peters2, Graham Merrington2, Merrin Adams1, Monique Binet1, Graeme Batley1, Francesca Gissi3, Kitty McKnight1, Emily Garman4, Ellie Middleton4, Jennifer Gadd5, Chris Schlekat4.   

Abstract

There has been an increased emphasis on incorporating bioavailability-based approaches into freshwater guideline value derivations for metals in the Australian and New Zealand water quality guidelines. Four bioavailability models were compared: the existing European biotic ligand model (European Union BLM) and a softwater BLM, together with 2 newly developed multiple linear regressions (MLRs)-a trophic level-specific MLR and a pooled MLR. Each of the 4 models was used to normalize a nickel ecotoxicity dataset (combined tropical and temperate data) to an index condition of pH 7.5, 6 mg Ca/L, 4 mgMg/L, (i.e., approximately 30 mgCaCO3 /L hardness), and 0.5 mgDOC/L. The trophic level-specific MLR outperformed the other 3 models, with 79% of the predicted 10% effect concentration (EC10) values within a factor of 2 of the observed EC10 values. All 4 models gave similar normalized species sensitivity distributions and similar estimates of protective concentrations (PCs). Based on the index condition water chemistry proposed as the basis of the national guideline value, a protective concentration for 95% of species (PC95) of 3 µg Ni/L was derived. This guideline value can be adjusted up and down to account for site-specific water chemistries. Predictions of PC95 values for 20 different typical water chemistries for Australia and New Zealand varied by >40-fold, which confirmed that correction for nickel bioavailability is critical for the derivation of site-specific guideline values. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:100-112.
© 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotic ligand model; Metals; Multiple linear regressions; Water quality criteria

Year:  2020        PMID: 32997805      PMCID: PMC7839744          DOI: 10.1002/etc.4885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  21 in total

1.  Cross-species extrapolation of chronic nickel Biotic Ligand Models.

Authors:  Christian E Schlekat; Eric Van Genderen; Karel A C De Schamphelaere; Paula M C Antunes; Emily C Rogevich; William A Stubblefield
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Comparison of the Chronic Toxicity of Nickel to Temperate and Tropical Freshwater Species.

Authors:  Adam Peters; Graham Merrington; Dean Leverett; Iain Wilson; Christian Schlekat; Emily Garman
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  The Effects of Nickel on the Structure and Functioning of a Freshwater Plankton Community Under High Dissolved Organic Carbon Conditions: A Microcosm Experiment.

Authors:  Charlotte Nys; Tina Van Regenmortel; Karel De Schamphelaere
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Validation of the nickel biotic ligand model for locally relevant species in Australian freshwaters.

Authors:  Adam Peters; Graham Merrington; Christian Schlekat; Karel De Schamphelaere; Jennifer Stauber; Graeme Batley; Andrew Harford; Rick van Dam; Ceiwen Pease; Tom Mooney; Michael Warne; Chris Hickey; Peter Glazebrook; John Chapman; Ross Smith; Rick Krassoi
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Hardness corrections for copper are inappropriate for protecting sensitive freshwater biota.

Authors:  S J Markich; G E Batley; J L Stauber; N J Rogers; S C Apte; R V Hyne; K C Bowles; K L Wilde; N M Creighton
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Empirical Bioavailability Corrections for Nickel in Freshwaters for Australia and New Zealand Water Quality Guideline Development.

Authors:  Adam Peters; Graham Merrington; Jenny Stauber; Lisa Golding; Graeme Batley; Francesca Gissi; Merrin Adams; Monique Binet; Kitty McKnight; Christian E Schlekat; Emily Garman; Ellie Middleton
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 7.  Does the scientific underpinning of regulatory tools to estimate bioavailability of nickel in freshwaters matter? The European-wide environmental quality standard for nickel.

Authors:  Adam Peters; Christian E Schlekat; Graham Merrington
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Best Practices for Derivation and Application of Thresholds for Metals Using Bioavailability-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Eric Van Genderen; Jenny L Stauber; Charles Delos; Diana Eignor; Robert W Gensemer; James McGeer; Graham Merrington; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.218

9.  Bioaccumulation and Toxicity of Cadmium, Copper, Nickel, and Zinc and Their Mixtures to Aquatic Insect Communities.

Authors:  Christopher A Mebane; Travis S Schmidt; Janet L Miller; Laurie S Balistrieri
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 10.  Validation of Bioavailability-Based Toxicity Models for Metals.

Authors:  Emily R Garman; Joseph S Meyer; Christine M Bergeron; Tamzin A Blewett; William H Clements; Michael C Elias; Kevin J Farley; Francesca Gissi; Adam C Ryan
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.218

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.