Literature DB >> 32997213

Dealing with PET radiometabolites.

Krishna Kanta Ghosh1, Parasuraman Padmanabhan2, Chang-Tong Yang1,3,4, Sachin Mishra1, Christer Halldin1,5, Balázs Gulyás6,7.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) offers the study of biochemical, physiological, and pharmacological functions at a cellular and molecular level. The performance of a PET study mostly depends on the used radiotracer of interest. However, the development of a novel PET tracer is very difficult, as it is required to fulfill a lot of important criteria. PET radiotracers usually encounter different chemical modifications including redox reaction, hydrolysis, decarboxylation, and various conjugation processes within living organisms. Due to this biotransformation, different chemical entities are produced, and the amount of the parent radiotracer is declined. Consequently, the signal measured by the PET scanner indicates the entire amount of radioactivity deposited in the tissue; however, it does not offer any indication about the chemical disposition of the parent radiotracer itself. From a radiopharmaceutical perspective, it is necessary to quantify the parent radiotracer's fraction present in the tissue. Hence, the identification of radiometabolites of the radiotracers is vital for PET imaging. There are mainly two reasons for the chemical identification of PET radiometabolites: firstly, to determine the amount of parent radiotracers in plasma, and secondly, to rule out (if a radiometabolite enters the brain) or correct any radiometabolite accumulation in peripheral tissue. Besides, radiometabolite formations of the tracer might be of concern for the PET study, as the radiometabolic products may display considerably contrasting distribution patterns inside the body when compared with the radiotracer itself. Therefore, necessary information is needed about these biochemical transformations to understand the distribution of radioactivity throughout the body. Various published review articles on PET radiometabolites mainly focus on the sample preparation techniques and recently available technology to improve the radiometabolite analysis process. This article essentially summarizes the chemical and structural identity of the radiometabolites of various radiotracers including [11C]PBB3, [11C]flumazenil, [18F]FEPE2I, [11C]PBR28, [11C]MADAM, and (+)[18F]flubatine. Besides, the importance of radiometabolite analysis in PET imaging is also briefly summarized. Moreover, this review also highlights how a slight chemical modification could reduce the formation of radiometabolites, which could interfere with the results of PET imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPLC; HPLC-MS; PET; Radiometabolites; Radiotracer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32997213     DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00692-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Res        ISSN: 2191-219X            Impact factor:   3.138


  65 in total

1.  A positron-emission transaxial tomograph for nuclear imaging (PETT).

Authors:  M M Ter-Pogossian; M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; N A Mullani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Analyses of [(18)F]altanserin bolus injection PET data. II: consideration of radiolabeled metabolites in humans.

Authors:  J C Price; B J Lopresti; C C Meltzer; G S Smith; N S Mason; Y Huang; D P Holt; R N Gunn; C A Mathis
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  Micro-PET imaging and small animal models of disease.

Authors:  Harvey R Herschman
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 4.  PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Yusuf E Erdi; Steven M Larson; Henry W D Yeung
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography.

Authors:  M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; N A Mullani; M M Ter-Pogossian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  PET studies with carbon-11 radioligands in neuropsychopharmacological drug development.

Authors:  C Halldin; B Gulyás; L Farde
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 7.  PET: the merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging.

Authors:  M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic imaging: a noninvasive method for determining drug distribution and action.

Authors:  Alan J Fischman; Nathaniel M Alpert; Robert H Rubin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  PET radiotracers: crossing the blood-brain barrier and surviving metabolism.

Authors:  Victor W Pike
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 10.  A philosophy for CNS radiotracer design.

Authors:  Genevieve C Van de Bittner; Emily L Ricq; Jacob M Hooker
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  PET as a Translational Tool in Drug Development for Neuroscience Compounds.

Authors:  Andrea Varrone; Christoffer Bundgaard; Benny Bang-Andersen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.903

2.  Dimethyl fumarate decreases short-term but not long-term inflammation in a focal EAE model of neuroinflammation.

Authors:  S K Vainio; A M Dickens; M Matilainen; F R López-Picón; R Aarnio; O Eskola; O Solin; D C Anthony; J O Rinne; L Airas; M Haaparanta-Solin
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.138

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.