David Zopfs1, Josefine Graffe2, Robert Peter Reimer1, Sebastian Schäfer3, Thorsten Persigehl1, David Maintz1, Jan Borggrefe1, Stefan Haneder1, Simon Lennartz1,4, Nils Große Hokamp5. 1. University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 3. Mint Medical GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cologne, Germany. nils.grosse-hokamp@uk-koeln.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Dual-energy computed tomography allows for an accurate and reliable quantification of iodine. However, data on physiological distribution of iodine concentration (IC) is still sparse. This study aims to establish guidance for IC in abdominal organs and important anatomical landmarks using a large cohort of individuals without radiological tumor burden. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-one oncologic, portal venous phase dual-layer spectral detector CT studies of the chest and abdomen without tumor burden at time point of imaging confirmed by > 3-month follow-up were included. ROI were placed in parenchymatous organs (n = 25), lymph nodes (n = 6), and vessels (n = 3) with a minimum of two measurements per landmark. ROI were placed on conventional images and pasted to iodine maps to retrieve absolute IC. Normalization to the abdominal aorta was conducted to obtain iodine perfusion ratios. Bivariate regression analysis, t tests, and ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Absolute IC showed a broad scatter and varied with body mass index, between different age groups and between the sexes in parenchymatous organs, lymph nodes, and vessels (range 0.0 ± 0.0 mg/ml-6.6 ± 1.3 mg/ml). Unlike absolute IC, iodine perfusion ratios did not show dependency on body mass index; however, significant differences between the sexes and age groups persisted, showing a tendency towards decreased perfusion ratios in elderly patients (e.g., liver 18-44 years/≥ 64 years: 0.50 ± 0.11/0.43 ± 0.10, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Distribution of IC obtained from a large-scale cohort is provided. As significant differences between sexes and age groups were found, this should be taken into account when obtaining quantitative iodine concentrations and applying iodine thresholds. KEY POINTS: • Absolute iodine concentration showed a broad variation and differed between body mass index, age groups, and between the sexes in parenchymatous organs, lymph nodes, and vessels. • The iodine perfusion ratios did not show dependency on body mass index while significant differences between sexes and age groups persisted. • Provided guidance values may serve as reference when aiming to differentiate healthy and abnormal tissue based on iodine perfusion ratios.
OBJECTIVES: Dual-energy computed tomography allows for an accurate and reliable quantification of iodine. However, data on physiological distribution of iodine concentration (IC) is still sparse. This study aims to establish guidance for IC in abdominal organs and important anatomical landmarks using a large cohort of individuals without radiological tumor burden. METHODS: Five hundred seventy-one oncologic, portal venous phase dual-layer spectral detector CT studies of the chest and abdomen without tumor burden at time point of imaging confirmed by > 3-month follow-up were included. ROI were placed in parenchymatous organs (n = 25), lymph nodes (n = 6), and vessels (n = 3) with a minimum of two measurements per landmark. ROI were placed on conventional images and pasted to iodine maps to retrieve absolute IC. Normalization to the abdominal aorta was conducted to obtain iodine perfusion ratios. Bivariate regression analysis, t tests, and ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Absolute IC showed a broad scatter and varied with body mass index, between different age groups and between the sexes in parenchymatous organs, lymph nodes, and vessels (range 0.0 ± 0.0 mg/ml-6.6 ± 1.3 mg/ml). Unlike absolute IC, iodine perfusion ratios did not show dependency on body mass index; however, significant differences between the sexes and age groups persisted, showing a tendency towards decreased perfusion ratios in elderly patients (e.g., liver 18-44 years/≥ 64 years: 0.50 ± 0.11/0.43 ± 0.10, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Distribution of IC obtained from a large-scale cohort is provided. As significant differences between sexes and age groups were found, this should be taken into account when obtaining quantitative iodine concentrations and applying iodine thresholds. KEY POINTS: • Absolute iodine concentration showed a broad variation and differed between body mass index, age groups, and between the sexes in parenchymatous organs, lymph nodes, and vessels. • The iodine perfusion ratios did not show dependency on body mass index while significant differences between sexes and age groups persisted. • Provided guidance values may serve as reference when aiming to differentiate healthy and abnormal tissue based on iodine perfusion ratios.
Authors: Philip Konietzke; Hauke H Steentoft; Willi L Wagner; Jonas Albers; Christian Dullin; Stephan Skornitzke; Wolfram Stiller; Tim F Weber; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Mark O Wielpütz Journal: Heliyon Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Robert Peter Reimer; Nils Große Hokamp; Julius Niehoff; David Zopfs; Simon Lennartz; Mariam Heidar; Roger Wahba; Dirk Stippel; David Maintz; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Christian Wybranski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240