Literature DB >> 32997172

Differential diagnosis of pancreatoblastoma (PB) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) in children by CT and MR imaging.

Zhaoxia Yang1, Ying Gong2, Min Ji1, Bin Yang1, Zhongwei Qiao1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether features on computed tomographic and/or magnetic resonance imaging can differentiate pancreatoblastoma (PB) from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas in children.
METHODS: Clinical and imaging data for 20 cases of SPNs and 14 cases of PB confirmed by surgery or biopsy were retrospectively analysed. The size, border, calcification, haemorrhage, solid/cystic component proportion, intratumoural vessels, tumour capsulation, pancreatic duct dilatation, peripancreatic vessel invasion, distant metastasis status and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the two groups were examined, and key diagnostic features were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test and Student's t test. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated when a single criterion was used.
RESULTS: Age ≤ 5 years, elevated serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), larger size, ill-defined border, calcification, absence of haemorrhage, intratumoural vessel, peripancreatic vessel invasion and distant metastasis differentiated PB from SPN (p < 0.05). ADC values of SPN were higher than those of PB (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding tumour capsule (p = 0.435), pancreatic duct dilatation (p = 1.000) or cystic degeneration area over 50% of the tumour volume (p = 1.000) between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The following features are helpful for differentiating PB from SPN: age ≤ 5 years, elevated serum AFP, larger size, ill-defined border, calcification, haemorrhage absence, intratumoural vessel, peripancreatic vessel invasion, distant metastasis and lower ADC value. KEY POINTS: • CT and MRI are helpful to differentiate pancreatoblastoma (PB) from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas in children. • The following features are helpful to differentiate PB from SPN: age ≤ 5 years, elevated serum AFP, larger size, ill-defined border, calcification, absence of haemorrhage, intratumoural vessel, peripancreatic vessel invasion, distant metastasis and lower ADC value.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Paediatrics; Pancreatic neoplasms; X-ray computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32997172     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07309-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  4 in total

Review 1.  Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Unfolding an Intriguing Condition.

Authors:  Manuel António Alves Cruz; Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro; Pedro Costa-Moreira; Guilherme Macedo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-19

Review 2.  Pseudopapillary solid tumour of the pancreas in paediatric age: description of a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Carmela Brillantino; Eugenio Rossi; Pietro Pirisi; Giovanni Gaglione; Maria E Errico; Rocco Minelli; Biagio F Menna; Raffaele Zeccolini; Massimo Zeccolini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-04-24

Review 3.  New insights in gastrointestinal "pediatric" neoplasms in adult patients: pancreatoblastoma, hepatoblastoma and embryonal sarcoma of the liver. A practical approach by GIPPI-GIPAD Groups.

Authors:  Vassilena Tsvetkova; Gaetano Magro; Giuseppe Broggi; Claudio Luchini; Filippo Cappello; Chiara Caporalini; Anna Maria Buccoliero; Luisa Santoro
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2022-02

4.  Application of CT Imaging in Differential Diagnosis and Nursing of Endocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Xue Jiang; Weiwei Xu; Ying Zhao
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.009

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.