Literature DB >> 32997164

Comparison of amide proton transfer imaging and magnetization transfer imaging in revealing glioma grades and proliferative activities: a histogram analysis.

Changliang Su1, Jingjing Jiang2, Chengxia Liu2, JingJing Shi2, Shihui Li2, Xiaowei Chen3, Qilin Ao4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comprehensive understanding glioma metabolic characters is of great help for patient management. We aimed to compare amide proton transfer imaging (APTw) and magnetization transfer imaging (MT) in predicting glioma malignancy and reflecting tumor proliferation.
METHODS: Thirty low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and 39 high-grade gliomas (HGGs) were prospectively included, of which 58 samples Ki-67 levels were quantified. Anatomical MRI, APTw, and MT were scanned, and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and asymmetric magnetic transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym(3.5ppm)) were calculated. ROIs were semi-automatically drawn with ImageJ, from which histogram features, including 5th, 25th, 50th, mean, 70th, 90th, and 95th percentiles were extracted. The independent t test was used to test differences in LGGs and HGGs, and correlations between histogram features and tumor grades, Ki-67 were revealed by Spearman's rank or Pearson's correlation analysis.
RESULTS: The maximum correlation coefficient (R) values of APTw were 0.526 (p < 0.001) with tumor grades and 0.397 (p < 0.001) with Ki-67 at 90th percentiles, while only 5th and 25th percentiles of MT significantly correlated with tumor grades. Moreover, APTw features were significantly different in LGGs and HGGs, except 5th percentile. The most significantly different feature was 95th percentile, providing the excellent AUC of 0.808. However, the best feature in MTR was 5th percentiles with AUC of 0.703. Combing 5th and 95th of APTw achieved highest AUC Of 0.837.
CONCLUSIONS: Both APTw and MT provide quantitative information for tumor metabolite imaging. However, APTw supplys more specific information in reflecting glioma biological behaviors than MT, and well differentiates glioma malignancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amide proton transfer imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetization transfer imaging; Tumor grading; Tumor proliferation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32997164     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02547-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  2 in total

1.  Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.

Authors:  M Law; R Young; J Babb; M Rad; T Sasaki; D Zagzag; G Johnson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Magnetization Transfer and Amide Proton Transfer MRI of Neonatal Brain Development.

Authors:  Yang Zheng; Xiaoming Wang; Xuna Zhao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Preliminary Application of Magnetization Transfer Imaging in the Study of Normal Uterus and Uterine Lesions.

Authors:  Qiu Bi; Qing Li; Jing Yang; Junyu Yang; Ji Du; Fan Ding; Yunzhu Wu; Shaoyu Wang; Ying Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.