Literature DB >> 32997121

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Deferred for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Because of COVID-19.

Richard Ro1, Sahil Khera1, Gilbert H L Tang2, Parasuram Krishnamoorthy1, Samin K Sharma1, Annapoorna Kini1, Stamatios Lerakis1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32997121      PMCID: PMC7527872          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic that has led to diversion of resources to the front lines and postponement of elective procedures. Patients with structural heart disease are a high-risk cohort because of their age and comorbidities. Management of their underlying condition has sometimes been delayed as a result of efforts to avoid community and health care setting exposure to COVID-19. An executive order was enacted by the New York State government on March 22, 2020, leading to cancellation of elective procedures. We describe here the outcomes of patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (AS) from our structural heart disease program during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This was a single-center cohort study of 77 patients with severe AS undergoing evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at a tertiary care hospital before the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was conducted under an institutional review board for the Structural Heart Program of Mount Sinai Hospital. The study posed minimal risk to patients, and the collected data were deidentified; thus, the need for informed consent was waived. This study follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. A cardiac event was defined as the need for urgent TAVR or death. Patients were followed up for 3 months. All data were compiled by weekly telephone calls and medical record review. Continuous variables are expressed as mean (SD), and categorical variables are expressed as percentages. The t test was used for continuous variables. For nonnormally distributed data, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. The χ2 test was used for categorical variables. A 2-tailed α of .05 was considered the threshold for statistical significance for all tests. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata MP statistical software version 14.0 (StataCorp). Data analysis was performed from March to June 2020.

Results

Of the 77 patients (mean [SD] age, 80 [8] years; 49 men [64.0%]), 55 (71.4%) had originally been scheduled for TAVR. Twenty-two patients (28.6%) had diagnostic testing or heart team appointments canceled because of COVID-19. Patient characteristics are shown (Table 1). During the initial 1-month period between March 23 and April 21, 2020, 8 of 77 (10%) experienced a cardiac event. Six patients underwent TAVR urgently for accelerating symptoms of dyspnea, angina at rest, heart failure, or syncope. Two patients died of severe AS. Those with a cardiac event, compared with those with no event, had a significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (mean [SD], 45% [16%] vs 56% [14%]; difference, 11%; 95% CI, 0.3%-21%; P = .04), a higher incidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (7 patients [87.5%] vs 35 patients [50.7%]; χ21 = 3.9; P = .048), and higher incidence of New York Heart Association class III (7 patients [87.5%] vs 26 patients [37.7%]) and class IV (1 patient [12.5%] vs 1 patient [1.4%]) symptoms (χ24 = 12.4; P = .02) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Patient Characteristics for the Total Cohort and According to Cardiac Events Between March 23 and April 21, 2020

CharacteristicPatients, No. (%)P value
Total study cohort (N = 77)TAVR or death (n = 8)No TAVR or death (n = 69)
Age, mean (SD), y80 (8)82 (8)79 (8).90
Male49 (64.0)4 (50.0)45 (65.2).40
Body mass index, mean (SD)a27.2 (5)27.4 (5)27.2 (4).90
Hypertension73 (94.0)8 (100.0)65 (94.2).40
Diabetes34 (44.2)3 (37.5)31 (44.9).70
Chronic kidney disease37 (48.1)3 (37.5)34 (49.2).50
End-stage kidney disease8 (10.1)1 (12.5)7 (10.1).80
Left ventricular ejection fraction, mean (SD), %55 (14)45 (16)56 (14).04
Cerebrovascular accident9 (11.4)2 (25.0)7 (10.1).20
Transient ischemic attack2 (2.5)02 (2.9).60
Prior permanent pacemaker7 (8.9)1 (12.5)6 (8.7).70
Coronary artery bypass grafting11 (14.3)2 (25.0)9 (13.0).40
Coronary artery disease42 (54.5)7 (87.5)35 (50.7).048
Atrial fibrillation24 (31.2)2 (25.0)22 (31.9).70
Congestive heart failure29 (37.7)5 (62.5)24 (34.8).10
Aortic valve gradient, mean (SD), mm Hg34 (13)36 (9)34 (14).80
Aortic valve area, mean (SD), cm20.8 (0.2)0.7 (0.2)0.8 (0.2).30
New York Heart Association symptom class
I8 (10.4)08 (11.6).02
II31 (40.3)031 (44.9)
III33 (42.9)7 (87.5)26 (37.7)
IV2 (2.6)1 (12.5)1 (1.4)

Abbreviation: TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Abbreviation: TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. We next performed an analysis where patients were followed up beyond the 1-month period, to June 6, 2020, when elective procedures at our hospital were permitted to resume. Between March 23 and June 6, 2020, 27 of 77 patients (35%) experienced a cardiac event, with 24 requiring urgent TAVR for accelerated symptoms and 3 dying. During this period, those who experienced a cardiac event, compared with those who did not, were more likely to have a history of cerebrovascular accident (6 patients [22.2%] vs 3 patients [6.0%]; χ21 = 4.5; P = .03) and New York Heart Association class III (22 patients [81.5%] vs 26 patients [52.0%]) and class IV (2 patients [7.4%] vs 1 patient [2.0%]) symptoms (χ24 = 10.6; P = .03). Patients who experienced a cardiac event had slightly lower left ventricular ejection fraction compared with those who did not but the difference was not significant (mean [SD], 52% [15%] vs 57% [13%]; difference, 5%; 95% CI, 0%-12%; P = .10) (Table 2). In the 3 months before March 2020, no patients died of AS while awaiting TAVR.
Table 2.

Patient Characteristics According to Cardiac Events Between March 23 and June 6, 2020

CharacteristicPatients, No. (%)P value
TAVR or death (n = 27)No TAVR (n = 50)
Age, mean (SD)80 (8)80 (8).90
Male15 (55.6)33 (66.0).40
Body mass index, mean (SD)a28 (5)27 (4).60
Hypertension26 (96.3)47 (94.0).70
Diabetes11 (40.7)24 (48.0).50
Chronic kidney disease12 (44.4)26 (52.0).60
End-stage kidney disease3 (11.1)5 (7.2).80
Left ventricular ejection fraction, mean (SD), %52 (15)57 (13).10
Cerebrovascular accident6 (22.2)3 (6.0).03
Prior permanent pacemaker4 (14.8)3 (6.0).20
Coronary artery bypass grafting4 (14.8)8 (16.0).90
Coronary artery disease16 (59.2)25 (50.0).40
Atrial fibrillation7 (25.9)18 (36.0).40
Congestive heart failure13 (48.1)15 (30.0).10
Aortic valve gradient, mean (SD), mm Hg36 (15)34 (12).60
Aortic valve area, cm20.8 (0.2)0.8 (0.2).60
New York Heart Association class
I04 (8.0).03
II3 (11.1)16 (32.0)
III22 (81.5)26 (52.0)
IV2 (7.4)1 (2.0)

Abbreviation: TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Abbreviation: TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Body mass index is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Discussion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, vigilance is needed for patients with AS awaiting TAVR, because 10% of our patients experienced a cardiac event during the first month, and 35% did so over the course of the next 3 months. We must be judicious when deciding to intervene, because there are additional risks to consider for both the patient and the heart team.[1,2] In addition, it is necessary to resume required interventions as we pass the initial peak of COVID-19 hospitalizations and health care resources become available. The study was limited by being a single-center study with a limited sample size. Patients with advanced symptoms, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, obstructive coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular accident history represent a high-risk population with AS, and the heart team should consider these factors for earlier access to TAVR during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Restructuring Structural Heart Disease Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Authors:  Christine J Chung; Tamim M Nazif; Mariusz Wolbinski; Emad Hakemi; Mark Lebehn; Russell Brandwein; Carolina Pinheiro Rezende; James Doolittle; Leroy Rabbani; Nir Uriel; Allan Schwartz; Angelo Biviano; Elaine Wan; Lisa Hathaway; Rebecca Hahn; Omar Khalique; Nadira Hamid; Vivian Ng; Amisha Patel; Torsten Vahl; Ajay Kirtane; Vinayak Bapat; Isaac George; Martin B Leon; Susheel K Kodali
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Triage Considerations for Patients Referred for Structural Heart Disease Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An ACC/SCAI Position Statement.

Authors:  Pinak B Shah; Frederick G P Welt; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alistair Phillips; Neal S Kleiman; Michael N Young; Matthew Sherwood; Wayne Batchelor; Dee Dee Wang; Laura Davidson; Janet Wyman; Sabeeda Kadavath; Molly Szerlip; James Hermiller; David Fullerton; Saif Anwaruddin
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 11.195

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Aortic stenosis post-COVID-19: a mathematical model on waiting lists and mortality.

Authors:  Christian Philip Stickels; Ramesh Nadarajah; Chris P Gale; Houyuan Jiang; Kieran J Sharkey; Ben Gibbison; Nick Holliman; Sara Lombardo; Lars Schewe; Matteo Sommacal; Louise Sun; Jonathan Weir-McCall; Katherine Cheema; James H F Rudd; Mamas Mamas; Feryal Erhun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  The Ongoing National Medical Staffing Crisis: Impacts on Care Delivery for Interventional Cardiologists.

Authors:  Robert F Riley; Mirvat Alasnag; Wayne B Batchelor; Abhishek Sharma; Evan Luse; Mary Drewes; Frederick G Welt; Dipti Itchhaporia; Timothy D Henry
Journal:  J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv       Date:  2022-04-15

3.  Best Practice Recommendations for Optimizing Care in Structural Heart Programs: Planning Efficient and Resource Leveraging Systems (PEARLS).

Authors:  Elizabeth M Perpetua; Kimberly A Guibone; Patricia A Keegan; Roseanne Palmer; Martina K Speight; Kornelija Jagnic; Joan Michaels; Rosemarie A Nguyen; Emily S Pickett; Dianna Ramsey; Susan J Schnell; Shing-Chiu Wong; Mark Reisman
Journal:  Struct Heart       Date:  2022-03-21

4.  Transcatheter-based aortic valve replacement vs. isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in 2020.

Authors:  Luise Gaede; Johannes Blumenstein; Clemens Eckel; Christina Grothusen; Vedat Tiyerili; Dagmar Sötemann; Holger Nef; Albrecht Elsässer; Stephan Achenbach; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.138

Review 5.  Impact of COVID-19 on Management Strategies for Coronary and Structural Heart Disease Interventions.

Authors:  Lina Ya'Qoub; Mohammad Alqarqaz; Vaikom S Mahadevan; Marwan Saad; Islam Y Elgendy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  A Comparative Analysis of In-Hospital Mortality per Disease Groups in Germany Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic From 2016 to 2020.

Authors:  Sebastian König; Vincent Pellissier; Sven Hohenstein; Johannes Leiner; Gerhard Hindricks; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Ralf Kuhlen; Andreas Bollmann
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.