| Literature DB >> 32995796 |
Pete Heinzelman1, Philip A Romero1,2.
Abstract
Understanding how human ACE2 genetic variants differ in their recognition by SARS-CoV-2 can have a major impact in leveraging ACE2 as an axis for treating and preventing COVID-19. In this work, we experimentally interrogate thousands of ACE2 mutants to identify over one hundred human single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) that are likely to have altered recognition by the virus, and make the complementary discovery that ACE2 residues distant from the spike interface can have a strong influence upon the ACE2-spike interaction. These findings illuminate new links between ACE2 sequence and spike recognition, and will find wide-ranging utility in SARS-CoV-2 fundamental research, epidemiological analyses, and clinical trial design.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32995796 PMCID: PMC7523126 DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.17.301861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: bioRxiv
Figure 1:Large-scale mutagenesis of ACE2’s peptidase domain. (a) Analysis of how amino acid substitutions across positions 18–615 affect binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The plot quantifies the importance of each site by taking the mean of the absolute value of all mutation effects observed at that site. The grey line represents the mean absolute value of the mutation effect and the blue line shows the moving average to highlight general regions of ACE2 that are important for binding. Key structural landmarks are highlighted with shaded regions along the length of the sequence. (b) Mutation effect heat maps for three different regions of ACE2. Red denotes mutations that increase ACE2 spike binding; blue denotes reduced binding. Overall, we observe the effects of 3571 amino acid substitutions across 597 positions in ACE2’s peptidase domain. (c) The mean absolute mutation effect mapped onto the three-dimensional ACE2 structure (PDB ID: 6LZG). Residues near the spike interface are important for binding, in addition to many sites located on the distal lobe of the protein domain. (d) The most important region of ACE2 structure is composed of a tightly packed cluster of residues located over 30 Å from the spike interface.
Figure 2:Functional annotation of human missense SNVs. (a) Our large-scale mutagenesis data encompasses 165 missense SNVs found in the human population. We assign putative spike protein binding annotations to these variants. Roughly two-thirds display decreased spike binding, one-third display binding similar to wild-type ACE2, and a small fraction display increased binding. (b) We estimate 320–365 individuals per 100,000 humans may harbor SNVs that decrease spike binding, while 4–12 individuals may have SNVs that increase binding. Specific human subpopulations possess higher and lower frequencies of SNVs that alter spike binding. Error bars represent one standard deviation and were generated by applying bootstrap statistical analysis to the SNV allele count data. (c) Data for YSD-based binding characterization of eight missense SNVs. The binding signal is defined as mean fluorescence for yeast-displayed ACE2 spike binding divided by mean fluorescence corresponding to ACE2 display level on the yeast surface (Supplementary Figures 4 & 5). This normalization is applied to prevent potential differences in ACE2 display from biasing assessment of spike binding. SNVs with negative mutation effect values appear as blue dots, while SNVs with positive mutation effects are shown in red. Each dot represents an experimental replicate at varying spike protein concentrations. The grey bars show wild-type ACE2’s binding signal to serve as a reference.