| Literature DB >> 32994757 |
Xian-Hui Jia1, Huan-Xin Zhao1, Cheng-Lin Du1, Wen-Zhao Tang1, Xiao-Jing Wang1.
Abstract
Naturally occurring phenanthroindolizidine and phenanthroquinolizidine alkaloids (PIAs and PQAs) are two small groups of herbal metabolites sharing a similar pentacyclic structure with a highly oxygenated phenanthrene moiety fused with a saturated or an unsaturated N-heterocycle (indolizidine/quinolizidine moieties). Natural PIAs and PQAs only could be obtained from finite plant families (such as Asclepiadaceae, Lauraceae and Urticaceae families, etc.). Up to date, more than one hundred natural PIAs, while only nine natural PQAs had been described. PIA and PQA analogues have been applied to the development of potent anticancer agents all along because of their excellent cytotoxic activity. However, in the last two decades, other great biological properties, such as anti-inflammatory and antiviral activities were revealed successively by different pharmacological assays. Especially because of their potent antiviral activity against coronavirus (TGEV, SARS CoV and MHV) and tobacco mosaic virus, PIA and PQA analogues have attracted much pharmaceutical attention again, some of them have been used to present interesting targets for total or semi synthesis, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) study for the development of antiviral agents. In this review, natural PIA and PQA analogues obtained in the last two decades with their herbal origins, key spectroscopic characteristics for structural identification, biological activity with possible SARs and application prospects were systematically summarized. We hope this paper can stimulate further investigations on PIA and PQA analogues as an important source for potential drug discovery. © Springer Nature B.V. 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Application prospects; Biological properties; Phenanthroindolizidine and Phenanthroquinolizidine alkaloids; Phytochemistry; Structure–activity relationships
Year: 2020 PMID: 32994757 PMCID: PMC7517060 DOI: 10.1007/s11101-020-09723-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytochem Rev ISSN: 1568-7767 Impact factor: 7.741
Fig. 1Structure skeletons of PIAs (I) and PQAs (II)
Herbal origins of natural PIAs
| No. | Latin name of natural source | Plant family | Name abbreviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asclepiadaceae | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | Moraceae | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | Lauraceae | ||
| 14 | |||
| 15 |
Herbal origins of natural PIAs presented in this Table were described in the literature of isolation only reported after the year 2000
The plant Latin names were presented according to the classification at http://www.theplantlist.org
Herbal origins of natural PQAs
| No. | Latin name of natural source | Plant family | Name abbreviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lauraceae | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | Urticaceae | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | Vitaceae |
Herbal origins of natural PQAs presented in this Table were all described in the literature of isolation up to date
The plant Latin names were presented according to the classification at http://www.theplantlist.org
The distribution of PIAs and PQAs in natural origins
| Compounds | Name | Origins | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Damu et al. ( Stærk et al. ( Nakano et al. ( | ||
| 2 | Stærk et al. ( An et al. ( Damu et al. ( Stærk et al. ( Subramaniam et al. ( Othmanan et al. ( Wu et al. ( | ||
| 3 | Ficuseptine B | Damu et al. ( | |
| 4 | Ficuseptine C | Damu et al. ( | |
| 5 | Ficuseptine D | Damu et al. ( | |
| 6 | Ficuseptine E | Damu et al. ( | |
| 7 | Ficuseptine F | Damu et al. ( | |
| 8 | Ficuseptine G | Damu et al. ( | |
| 9 | Ficuseptine H | Damu et al. ( | |
| 10 | Ficuseptine H | Damu et al. ( | |
| 11 | Damu et al. ( | ||
| 12 | Damu et al. ( | ||
| 13 | Tylophoridicine A | Dhiman et al. ( | |
| 14 | 13a | Stærk et al. ( | |
| 15 | 13aR-7-O-desmethyltylophorine | Stærk et al. ( Nakano et al. ( | |
| 16 | 13a | Chen et al. ( | |
| 17 | Tylophovatine C | Lee et al. ( | |
| 18 | O-methyl-tylophorinidine | Lee et al. ( | |
| 19 | (13a | Xiang et al. ( | |
| 20 | (13a | Xiang et al. ( | |
| 21 | Wu et al. ( Lee et al. ( Chen et al. ( | ||
| 22 | 13a | Chen et al. ( | |
| 23 | 13a | Lee et al. ( | |
| 24 | (+)-tylocrebrine | Wu et al. ( | |
| 25 | Deoxytylophorinine (20) | Chen et al. ( | |
| 26 | 13a | Lee et al. ( | |
| 27 | 13a | Wu et al. ( Stærk et al. ( Nakano et al. ( | |
| 28 | 2-hydroxyltylophorinidine | Chen et al. ( | |
| 29 | 3-O-demethyltylophorinidine | Chen et al. ( | |
| 30 | Tylophorinidine | Dhiman et al. ( Xiang et al. ( Chen et al. ( | |
| 31 | Tylophoridicine E (13a | Huang et al. ( Chen et al. ( Lee et al. ( | |
| 32 | O-methyltylophorinidine (13a | Chen et al. ( | |
| 33 | (13a | Lee et al. ( Xiang et al. ( | |
| 34 | 11-ketotylophorinidine | Chen et al. ( | |
| 35 | 11-keto-O-methyltylophorinidine | Chen et al. ( | |
| 36 | 6-O- | Chen et al. ( | |
| 37 | Tylophorinine | Dhiman et al. ( Chen et al. ( | |
| 38 | (13a | Huang et al. ( | |
| 39 | Hispiloscine | Yap et al. ( | |
| 40 | Tengechlorenine | Al-Khdhairawi et al. ( | |
| 41 | 10 | Stærk et al. ( Dhiman et al. ( | |
| 42 | 10 | Damu et al. ( Damu et al. ( | |
| 43 | 10 | Damu et al. ( Damu et al. ( | |
| 44 | Ficuseptine K | Damu et al. ( | |
| 45 | Ficuseptine L | Damu et al. ( | |
| 46 | Tylophorine | Nakano et al. ( | |
| 47 | (-)-14 | Stærk et al. ( | |
| 48 | 10 | Chen et al. ( | |
| 49 | Tylophorinine | Chen et al. ( | |
| 50 | 14 | Nakano et al. ( | |
| 51 | Ficuseptine N | Damu et al. ( | |
| 52 | 3-demethyl-14 | Nakano et al. ( | |
| 53 | 10 | Wu et al. ( Chen et al. ( | |
| 54 | 10 | Chen et al. ( | |
| 55 | 10 | Chen et al. ( | |
| 56 | 10 | Chen et al. ( | |
| 57 | 10 | Chen et al. ( | |
| 58 | Ficuseptine M | Damu et al. ( | |
| 59 | Ficuseptine A | Wu et al. ( Damu et al. ( | |
| 60 | 14 | Wu et al. ( | |
| 61 | 10 | Damu et al. ( Nakano et al. ( | |
| 62 | Tylophoridicine C (13a | Huang et al. ( Chen et al. ( | |
| 63 | 3-demethyl-14 | Nakano et al. ( | |
| 64 | Tylophoridicine F (13a | Huang et al. ( | |
| 65 | 10 | Damu et al. ( | |
| 66 | 10 | Damu et al. ( | |
| 67 | Tylophoridicine D | Chen et al. ( Dhiman et al. ( Kubo et al. ( | |
| 68 | Dehydrotylophorine | Damu et al. ( Kubo et al. ( Wu et al. ( | |
| 69 | Dehydroantofine | Kubo et al. ( Wu et al. ( | |
| 70 | Ficuseptine I | Damu et al. ( | |
| 71 | 13a | Stærk et al. ( Subramaniam et al. ( | |
| 72 | 13a | Stærk et al. ( Othman et al. ( | |
| 73 | Fistulopsine A | Yap et al. ( | |
| 74 | Tylophovatine A | Lee et al. ( | |
| 75 | ( | Lee et al. ( | |
| 76 | Tylophovatine B | Lee et al. ( | |
| 77 | ( | Lee et al. ( | |
| 78 | Fistulopsine B | Yap et al. ( | |
| 79 | (−)-desmethylsecoantofine | Othmanan et al. ( | |
| 80 | 4a,b-seco-dehydroantofine | Kubo et al. ( | |
| 81 | ( | Lande ( Hoffmann et al. ( Krmpotic et al. ( Hoffmann et al. ( Cai et al. ( Thuy et al. ( | |
| 82 | ( | Luo et al. ( | |
| 83 | Cryptopleuridine | Johns et al. ( | |
| 84 | (14a | Cai et al. ( | |
| 85 | Boehmeriasin B | Luo et al. ( | |
| 86 | Pileamartine C | Thuy et al. ( | |
| 87 | Pileamartine D | Thuy et al. ( | |
| 88 | Kayawongine | Saifah et al. ( | |
| 89 | Julandine | Thuy et al. ( | |
*Natural PIAs presented in this Table were all isolated after the year 2000, those PIA analogues obtained before had been summarized in a few reviews (Govindachari and Viswanathan 1978; Gellert 1982; Li et al. 2001)
**All nine isolated PQA analogues up to date were presented in this Table
Fig. 2Skeleton variations of the isolated PIAs (I-1–I-4) and PQAs (II-1 and II-2)
Fig. 3Structures of isolated PIAs with 13aR- configuration
Fig. 4Structures of isolated PIAs with 13aS- configuration
Fig. 5Structures of isolated PIAs N-oxides
Fig. 6Structures of isolated dehydro- (67–70) and seco- (71–80) PIAs
Fig. 7Structures of isolated PQAs
Fig. 8Fragmentation pathway proposed to account for the CID spectra of tylophoridicine C (62) by positive ion FAB-MS. The structure of compound 62 was firstly elucidated to be (13aS,14S)-6,14-dihydroxy-3,7-dimethoxyphenanthroindolizidine N-oxide from T. atrofolliculata, also named as tylophoridicine C (Huang et al. 2004), while its name of 3,6,7-trimethoxy-10-oxyphenanthroindolizidine for FAB-MS in the reference was incorrect (Xiang et al. 2002)
Fig. 9Possible SARs on the HIF-1 inhibitory activity of PIAs analogues. SARs were deduced entirely from the HIF-1 inhibitory results of natural PIA analogues isolated from T. atrofolliculata (Chen et al. 2016, 2019a)
Fig. 10Possible SARs of anti-inflammatory activity based on the NO suppression IC50 values of tylophorine (1) and antofine (2). Tylophorine (1) and its derivatives (s-1–s-3 and s-9) could be prepared by synthetic methods (Chuang et al. 2006). Antofine (2) and its synthesized derivatives (s-4–s-8) were obtained as described by Fu and his co-workers (Fu et al. 2007)
Fig. 11Possible SARs of the anti-TGEV activity for PIA derivatives based on tylophorine (1). In the anti-TGEV assay, compounds 31, 33 and 37 were used as natural products from T. ovata (31 and 33) and T. indica (37). Other compounds were all synthesized derivatives (Yang et al. 2010)
Fig. 12Structures of some typical PIA derivatives with their inhibition against TMV in vitro. In the anti-TMV assay, all the compounds were used as synthesized derivatives on the base of (R/S) -tylophorine or (R/S)-antofine. Their anti-TMV activity were revealed by the inhibition ratio (%) at 500 μg/mL. The inhibitions of ningnanmycin, a commercial antiviral agent as the positive control, were about 70% in different anti-TMV assays in vitro